EI v MG Ltd [2025] NZDT 4 (14 April 2025) [pdf, 192 KB]
...foreign object in the crackling the claim would most likely be covered by ACC and, if not a foreign object it is quite possible there would be hard bits of crackling and this would be quite normal. 3. Subsequent to the hearing of the claim EI filed a claim with ACC and this claim was not accepted by ACC because the definition of personal injury excludes injuries caused by the natural use of teeth, for example chewing or biting. 4. The issues I must decide are: a. Is the pork cr...