18485 items matching your search terms
...the Authority found persuasive was not given to the Court. Costs [45] Costs are reserved. I encourage the parties to reach agreement on costs if they can. If they are unable to do so, counsel for the defendant has 20 working days in which to file a memorandum. Counsel for the plaintiff is then to have a further 15 working days to respond. A A Couch Judge Oral judgment delivered at 4.21 pm on 9 November 2010
...orders made is unknown as orders are usually made at case management conferences, where this data is not recorded. However, in the year ending 31 July 2011, approximately 2000 general civil proceedings and 140 applications for judicial review were filed in the High Court. While not all of these cases would require discovery, the number of discovery orders made in the High Court each year is substantial. The quantity of discovered documents varies between cases. The scope of...
...determination is set aside and replaced by this judgment which finds that Mr Jopson was dismissed justifiably by BMDL. [37] If costs (including costs in the Authority) cannot be agreed between the parties, the plaintiff may apply by memorandum filed and served by 1 March 2010 with the defendant having the period of one month to respond by memorandum. GL Colgan Chief Judge Judgment signed at 4.30 pm on Tuesday 22 December 2009
...evidence of his loss of self-esteem, I find he is entitled to compensation in the full amount that he sought of $12,000. Costs [39] Counsel asked for costs to be reserved. In the absence of agreement on this, counsel for the defendant is to file a memorandum of costs by 31 January 2007. The defendant has 14 days to reply. C M Shaw JUDGE Judgment signed at 10.30am on 14 December 2006
...met the Court is required to grant leave: no residual discretion exists. I do not accept that submission, for reasons set out below. The facts [5] The facts, as far as they can be discerned at this early stage, can be drawn from the affidavits filed in support of, and in opposition to, the application for leave. They can be summarised as follows. [6] The applicant commenced employment with Dionex Pty Limited (the respondent) on 24 May 2004, initially in the position of Technica...
...RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE L R HARVEY Copies to: Mr S S Bhullar, Ferguson, Bhullar & Scott, P O Box 26 Taumarunui 3946 fbs@xtra.co.nz mailto:fbs@xtra.co.nz 305 Aotea MB 2 Introduction [1] Annie Kui Martin filed an application for succession on 20 January 1987 per s 78A of the Māori Affairs Amendment Act 1967 to the interests of her biological brother Jackie Te Ratu Tio. 1 The proceeding was originally heard before Judge Hingston and then Judge...
...supporters of the applicant who had previously provided written testimonials. His partner gave supportive evidence. Interestingly, the appellant’s former wife attended the hearing and gave evidence in support of the applicant and she had previously filed a written testimonial. She has known the applicant for 30 years and was his wife for 23 of those years but remains his friend. She described him as a very motivated person and, inter alia, stated “he has always been into some sort...
...direct the Registrar to arrange a Directions Hearing by telephone in the usual way to progress a timetable towards our dealing with the issue of penalty.” The Submissions of the Appellants on Penalty [4] Extracts from the typewritten submissions filed with the Registry by the appellant complainants on penalty read as follows: “It is difficult for us as complainants to make submissions as to penalties when there was such a palpable bias by the Tribunal panel against us as self-rep...
...He has a history of criminal offending against clients, and at the time Ms Zhou commenced employment he was facing criminal charges for breaches of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 (the Act). [2.2] Ms Zhou took over Mr Eppanapally’s file soon after she started working in the Practice. She was the sole licence holder in the Practice at that time. She wrote a submission in response to a query from Immigration New Zealand. However, Immigration New Zealand was not satisfied with...
...July 2014 (Heard at Kaitaia) Judgment: 07 August 2014 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE D J AMBLER 84 Taitokerau MB 190 Introduction [1] On 7 May 2014 Graeme Neho filed an application under s 269(4) and (6) of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (“the Act”) for an investigation into the outcome of the Muriwhenua Incorporation’s (“the Incorporation”) election of members to the Committee of Managemen...