18495 items matching your search terms
...advised that Ms IK is her niece. [8] Mr NG described the state of Mr and Mrs AB’s health in the following terms: “Mrs AB is almost blind, frail and elderly but has all of her mental faculties 1 The file was initially referred to a legal executive at the firm but Mr NG advised in his response to the complaint that because Mr AB was Maori (as is Mr NG) that it would be preferable for him to act for Mr and Mrs AB. 2 Letter UW to NZLS (2...
...TRUST Respondent Hearing: On the papers Judgment: 31 May 2018 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE S TE A MILROY 162 Waikato Maniapoto MB 169 Introduction [1] An application for a rehearing was filed by Sybil Mikaere and William Rickit on 18 May 2018. The application seeks a rehearing of applications filed by Britson (Buddy) Mikaere on behalf of the trustees of Manaia No 6 (called the Taoki Trust) to determine the ownership of a d...
...any preferred alienees wish to exercise their right of first refusal, an applicant for confirmation of alienation under rule 11.3 must— (a) give public notice that complies with rule 11.5(3); and (b) following publication, without delay file a copy of the notice with the Registrar; and (c) comply with any directions that the Court has made in relation to notice. 225 Waiariki MB 156 (3) The notice required under rule 11.5(2) must— (a) be in form 27; and...
...counsel for defendant Judgment: 18 March 2025 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE J C HOLDEN (Application for urgency, application for non-publication and application for stay) [1] On 10 December 2024, Scott’s Brewing Ltd filed a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority that ordered that Tyla Scott be reinstated on an interim basis to the payroll of Scott’s Brewing.1 She is now receiving approximately $8,840 per month from Scott�...
...Judge C L Fox 127 Tairāwhiti MB 2 Hei tīmatanga kōrero Introduction [1] This matter concerns three applications relating to Mangapoike 2A2 Sections 12, 46, 47 & 48 (Te Reinga Marae). The first was filed by Mere Kokiri-Tamanui in 2020 for an inquiry pursuant to reg 21 of the Māori Reservation Regulations 1994 (the Regulations). As a result, Mr Leonard Hemi was appointed as an independent lawyer to inquire into the operation of the res...
...David Tata, had breached their obligations and duties and were jointly and severally liable, together with Tania Martin, to repay trust funds of $37,803.34, that had been paid to Mrs Martin between 2008 and 2010.1 Mr Tata and Mrs Martin then filed separate appeals against that decision. 1 Tata v Katipa – Waiwhakaata 3E4C Lot 2A (2018) 170 Waikato Maniapoto MB 123 (170 WMN 123) 2020 Māori Appellate Court MB 168 [2] Mr...
...2008, the plaintiff signalled the possibility of an increased claim for damages and the possibility that various scenarios could be contemplated which could see the damages period extend through until 2007. Mr Toogood noted that in the memorandum filed by the defendants, dated 4 December 2008, in response to the plaintiff’s memorandum, they did not protest that their clients would suffer any injustice if consideration of the quantum issues was deferred until after the Court’s f...
...COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 141 ARC 38/13 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for further disclosure, an application for leave to extend time to file briefs in reply, an application for leave to file an amended statement of claim BETWEEN AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Plaintiff AND GRANT KERR Defendant Hearing: (on the papers by way of submissions dated 10,...
...EDWARDS-WALKER AND TE HEMOATA DAWN POMANA Respondents Hearing: 14 Täkitimu MB 62, dated 8 February 2012 (Heard at Hastings) Judgment: 28 March 2013 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE L R HARVEY Introduction [1] On 2 November 2011 Mark Mansfield filed an application under s 238 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 for an enforcement of the obligations of the Raniera Te Huango Trust. The applicant alleges that there has been a lack of accountability by the trustees. In partic...
...Respondent to the decision of the LCRO in Appleby Building Ltd v Alva, LCRO 117/09, in which it was held that a practitioner could not claim privilege against an investigative body such as the Standards Committee or the LCRO and object to providing any files, records or other documentary evidence required by the investigating body in the course of its investigation. [43] As a result of that, the Respondent forwarded all of her files to the Standards Committee and requested that the...