18490 items matching your search terms
...the Lawyers Complaints Service “responding to all 3 complaints”, denying the complaint, asserting that the orders under LCRO 109/2011 were not applicable for reasons of non-party status. The submission was copied to the applicants after it was filed, and whereas- (a) The applicants did not have full knowledge of the complaint. (b) They did not have input into the defence. (c) They trusted Mr TT to deal with it appropriately.
...on which it is reasonably open to conclude that she was merely incompetent. At the core of the allegation that Ms Goldsmith entirely abandoned any ethical standards is the finding that she advised a client not to disclose a conviction. She then filed papers with Immigration New Zealand that were dishonest, as they failed to disclose the conviction. Ms Goldsmith effectively denied she gave the advice, and had no responsibility for the false information. When confronted with evidence,...
...victims’ claims process[1]; expressly providing that the Act applies and has always applied to unlawful detention claims[2]; and suspending the civil limitation period from when compensation is paid to the Secretary of Justice until the deadline for the filing of a victim’s claim under the Act (to ensure delays in assessing deductions to not prevent victims from being able to make claims).[3] 3. The Bill raises the following issues under the Bill of Rights Act: 3.1 The Bil...
...should have orally summarised the main concerns from the statement to the defendant and asked for instructions. He should not have provided a copy of the statement to anyone, let alone the defendant’s partner. Application for review [17] Mr ZO filed an application for review on 8 August 2014. The outcome sought is reversal of the Committee’s decision. [18] Mr ZO prefaced his submissions with acknowledgement that he understood and sympathised with the concerns Ms BV had rais...
...network-wide traffic police deployment system. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 33(3), 393- 406. New Zealand Government (2012). Embedding the Safe System approach to road safety. Retrieved from http://www.saferjourneys.govt.nz/assets/Safer-journeys-files/safe- system-for-designers-leaflet.pdf New Zealand Transport Agency (2016). Road Policing Programme (RPP). Retrieved from https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/road- policing-programme/ Povey, L. J., Frith, W. J., & Keall, M. D. (...
...Gilchrist-Scott, D., Roman, J., Taxy, S., & Roman, C. (2012). Supportive Housing for Returning Prisoners: Outcomes and Impacts of the Returning Home—Ohio Pilot Project. Ohio: The Urban Institiute. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/pu blication/25716/412632-Supportive- Housing-for-Returning-Prisoners- Outcomes-and-Impacts-of-the-Returning- Home-Ohio-Pilot-Project.PDF Freedman, M., & Owens, E. G. (2011). Low- income housing development and crime. Journal...
...adviser, is a director of Care Immigration Ltd, of Auckland. [6] The complainant, a national of India, had a work visa due to expire on 6 March 2019. Ms Mackintosh was engaged on 19 July 2018 to seek a further work visa. An application was duly filed by Ms Mackintosh on 2 August 2018, but she did not respond to Immigration New Zealand’s letter of 12 September 2018 seeking further information. Immigration New Zealand accordingly declined the work visa on 25 September 2018....
...costs, based on what he characterised as the hopeless, frivolous and vexatious nature of the challenge, would be sought. [43] The parties are encouraged to agree costs. If costs cannot be agreed, I will receive memoranda, with the defendant filing and serving within 15 working days of 4 See for example, Scissor Platforms (1997) Ltd v Brien [1999] 2 ERNZ 672 at 681-682; Davidson v Christchurch City Council [1995] 1 ERNZ 172 at 204....
...that a fine is appropriate. (b) Broadspectrum is fined $25,000 for that breach. (c) Of that fine, $10,000 is directed to be paid to Mr Nathan. Costs [61] Costs are reserved. Mr Nathan is entitled to costs. In the absence of agreement he may file memoranda within 15 working days and Broadspectrum may reply in a further 15 working days. K G Smith Judge Judgment signed at 1 pm on 27 September 2017 16 Domingo v Meng Suo...
...(if any) should be made is determined on the basis of written submissions by or on behalf of the [2019] NZREADT 19 - McNicholl parties. In the event that the parties agree to follow this course, then submissions for the appellants are to be filed and served within 14 days of the date of this decision, then submissions on behalf of Mr O'Loughlin within a further 14 days, and submissions on behalf of the Authority within a further 14 days. [50] If any party seeks an oral he...