Search Results

1. [2017] NZEmpC 12 Stormont v Peddle Thorp Aitken Ltd [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...defendant, Mr Sharp, raised a procedural issue. The issue revolved around an affirmative defence contained within the defendant’s statement of defence to the plaintiff’s statement of claim. Mr Sharp pointed out that the plaintiff had not filed a reply and argued that the consequence of this was that the plaintiff must be taken as having admitted the defendant’s allegations. [3] When Mr Sharp advanced the argument, Ms Stewart (counsel for the plaintiff) immediately raised an...

2. Foster v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal) [2022] NZACC 209 [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Judgment on the papers. Submissions: K Koloni for the Appellant R Waginasekera for the Respondent Date of Judgment: 17 November 2022 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Late filing of an appeal to the District Court – s 151, Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] The appeal in the above matter was lodged by Ms Foster (without an Authority to Act in favour of Ms Koloni) on 17 August 2022. The appea...

3. [2024] NZLVT 008 - Sahim v Auckland Council (5 March 2024) [pdf, 279 KB]

   ...February 2024 Date of Decision: 5 March 2024 Date of Issue: 5 March 2024 DECISION OF THE LAND VALUATION TRIBUNAL A: There is a valid objection. B: An objection was filed with the Tribunal in time. In the alternative, the time for filing an objection with the Tribunal is enlarged in accordance with Rule 29 of the Land Valuation Tribunals Rules 1977. C: Costs are reserved. 2 REASONS Introduction This decision relates to an objection filed by AN and M Sahi...

4. BU v DG LCRO 276 / 2011 (17 September 2013) [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...money. BU says he agreed to suspend interim billing, and render a final invoice for all of DN’s fees, when DN settled matters with his wife, because at that stage DN expected his cashflow to improve. As matters transpired, however, DG took the file over before DN and his wife reached settlement. [19] DG says that at their first meeting in mid-July 2010, DN appeared to have lost all confidence in BU, and said that he wanted to make a complaint. DG was therefore aware from th...

5. ENV-2020-AKL-000091

   Appeal ENV-2020-AKL-000091 Hamilton City Council v Waikato Regional Council s274 interested parties Auckland/Waikato Fish and Game Council Beef+Lamb New Zealand Limited Federated Farmers of New Zealand Genesis Energy Limited Graeme Gleeson Hauraki District Council Landcorp Farming Limited Matamata-Piako District Council OJI Fibre Solutions NZ Limited Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Incorporated South Waikato District Council Taupo District Council Waikato District Council

   Located in:

   1. Environment Court >
   2. Environment Court cases online >
   3. Waikato Regional Council Plan Change 1

6. Chief Executive expenses

   This information is provided in response to the Public Services Commission's disclosure regime for chief executive expenses, gifts and hospitality, and has been submitted to Data.govt.nz For more information, see the Te Kawa Mataaho Public Service Commission website. Latest disclosure Chief Executive Expenses 1 July 2024 - 30 June 2025 Chief Executive Expenses 1 July 2023 - 30 June 2024 Chief Executive Expenses 1 July 2022 - 30 June 2023 Chief Executive Expenses: 1 July 2021 - 30 June 2022 Chief

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. About us >
   3. Corporate publications

7. Practice notes & procedures

   Practice notes cover many topics. They can contain guidelines on how a case must be managed, from the filing of the first document that starts proceedings through to disposition (the end of the case). They can also outline how professional services must be managed. Family Court caseflow management practice notes Family Court Caseflow Management (Currently under review) Applications under the Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988 Joint protocol Ministry of Justice and Department of...

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. Lawyers & service providers >
   3. Service providers

8. Taylor v Department of Corrections (Strike-Out Application) [2020] NZHRRT 42 [pdf, 137 KB]

   ...decision is to be cited as Taylor v Department of Corrections (Strike-Out Application) [2020] NZHRRT 42.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2020] NZHRRT 42 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 BACKGROUND [2] Mr Taylor and Mr Hunter initially filed this claim together, on 13 February 2015. A statement of reply was filed on 27 March 2015. On 22 March 2019, the Tribunal struck out Mr Hunter as a plaintiff. The Tribunal also restricted the scope of the claim to IPP 6, which was...

9. [2007] NZEmpC WC 10/07 Nola & Anor v Harvey [pdf, 43 KB]

   ...of hearing and phone calls, there was no appearance for the employers at the investigation meeting which proceeded on 5 October 2006 in their absence. [6] The Authority issued its determination on 9 October 2006 at which time the 28 days for filing a challenge began to run. The last day for electing to challenge the determination was 6 November 2006. [7] On 19 October 2006 Ms Nola wrote to the Authority to complain about the outcome of the determination and to explain why she had...

10. Recording Industry Association of New Zealand v TCLE-A-T6518151 [2013] NZCOP 12 [pdf, 222 KB]

    ...Act 1994 BETWEEN RECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION NEW ZEALAND Applicant AND TCLE[A]-T6518151 Respondent BEFORE THE COPYRIGHT TRIBUNAL Jane Glover DECISION ON THE PAPERS Introduction [1] This case concerns alleged file sharing infringement under s.122A-U of the Copyright Act 1994 (“the Act”).1 Sections 122A-U of the Act set out a process for copyright owners to use when they consider that an internet user has infringed their copyright via a file...