Search Results

1. Holmqvist v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 403) & Coma [2017] NZREADT 15 [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...back to the Committee for it to undertake an inquiry Outcome [47] The appeal is dismissed [48] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Act, which sets out appeal rights. Any appeal must be filed in the High Court within 20 working days of the date on which the Tribunal’s decision is served. The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rules. ____________________ Hon P J Andrews Chair...

2. LCRO 59/2016 and 61/2016 DE and QV v Standards Committee (27 September 2018) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...responsible for ensuring that the firm’s nominee company lending complied with applicable regulations”.1 [11] The firm of FGH Ltd had eight partners at the time the various issues raised by Mr BC arose, but there is no indication on the Committee’s file as to why it proceeded only against the applicants and Mr MO. [12] Mr DE was the Trust Account Partner and the partner “most directly involved in the administration of the nominee company”, but each of the eight partners...

3. LCRO 60/2016 MO v Standards Committee (27 September 2018) [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...responsible for ensuring that the firm’s nominee company lending complied with applicable regulations”.1 [11] The firm of FGH Ltd had eight partners at the time the various issues raised by Mr BC arose, but there is no indication on the Committee’s file as to why it proceeded only against Mr MO and the other two partners. [12] Mr DE was the Trust Account Partner of the firm and the partner “most directly involved in the administration of the nominee company”, but each of...

4. Myoak Holdings Ltd v Te Huia - Waipuka 2T Roadway (2019) 75 Tākitimu MB 90 (75 TKT 90) [pdf, 316 KB]

   ...for school groups to be staying at the Marae. They remain concerned for the safety of their manuhiri, including children, because of the danger associated with vehicles speeding along the Roadway. Procedural history [6] The application was filed by John O’Connor on Monday 1 April 2019. As a preliminary step in considering the application, the Court attended a site visit on Thursday 4 April 2019 to inspect the speed humps and the Roadway generally. An audio-visual hearing wa...

5. CAC 413 v Marr [2019] NZREADT 28 - Penalty (1 July 2019) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...dishonesty on a number of fronts. She submitted that Ms Marr’s conduct warrants the penalty of cancellation of her licence. Ms Marr [22] Mr Wain made a number of submissions regarding the Tribunal’s findings. We are aware that Ms Marr has filed an appeal. In the circumstances, it is not appropriate that we set out or comment on this part of Mr Wain’s submissions. [23] Mr Wain submitted that the context of the charges must be taken into account in determining the seriousn...

6. Boon v McQueen - Waiwhakaata 3E6 Section 4B2 (2021) 214 Waikato Maniapoto MB 1 (214 WMN 1) [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...he held the majority view to ransom. 10 Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993, s 227(6). 214 Waikato Maniapoto MB 12 [20] I note that the majority trustees alleged that Warren McQueen exhibits bullying behaviour in his role as trustee. They filed audio recordings of trustee meetings in support of this allegation. It is difficult to make a factual finding on this allegation based on the evidence before the Court. On the one hand, four of the six trustees make this allegation,...

7. Beef & Lamb New Zealand Limited [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...(b) A copy of the relevant decision; and (c) A list of the names and addresses of persons to be served with a copy of this notice. CP Thomsen Counsel for the Appellant 8 July 2020 15 This notice of appeal was filed by CHRISTOPHER PAUL THOMSEN, solicitor for the Appellant of the firm Fletcher Vautier Moore. The address for service of the above-named Appellant is at the offices of Fletcher Vautier Moore, Solicitors, 265A Queen Street, Richmond, Nels...

8. INZ (Foley) v Rodriguez [2019] NZIACDT 51 (23 July 2019) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...[2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 9 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 8 [41] There are no submissions from the complainant. [42] Ms Farrow, on behalf of Ms Rodriguez has filed a statement of reply, dated 8 November 2017, together with her submissions to the Authority of 25 September 2017, further submissions (marked “B”) and other supporting documents. ASSESSMENT [43] The Registrar relies on the fo...

9. [2019] NZEmpC 191 Rachelle v Air New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 448 KB]

   ...Outcome [48] I am satisfied that Air New Zealand did not engage in any activity giving rise to a personal grievance by Ms Rachelle. Her challenge is unsuccessful and it is dismissed. [49] Air New Zealand is entitled to an award of costs. It may file submissions within 20 working days of the date of this decision. Ms Rachelle may have a further 20 working days to respond and Air New Zealand may reply to her submissions within a further five working days. K G...

10. [2020] NZEmpC 52 Dillon v Tullycrine Ltd [pdf, 230 KB]

    ...and cannot agree them with Mr Dillon, an application may be made to the Court within 20 working days of the date of this judgment. Mr Dillon then has 15 working days within which to respond and if Tullycrine wishes to reply, that reply is to be filed and served within a further five working days. J C Holden Judge Judgment signed at 4 pm on 28 April 2020 10 Employment Relations Act 2000, sch 3 cl 12(1). 11 H v A Ltd [20...