Search Results

1. LQ v VN LCRO 43 / 2011 (3 May 2012) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...would have been able to apply for costs against VN. Section 215 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 provides that for the purpose of enforcing any Order of the LCRO for the payment of costs and expenses or both, a duplicate of the Order may be filed in the office of the Court named in the Order and thereupon becomes enforceable in all respects as a final judgement. [46] Section 215 does not apply to an Order for compensation. However, this does not preclude ordinary proceedings...

2. VW v AR LCRO 110 / 2012 (12 December 2012) [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...is some confusion in the papers as to the exact date of this telephone call. In his submissions to the Standards Committee, the Practitioner indicates that the call was received on 20 January. However the attached contemporaneous handwritten file note of that call seems to be dated 29 January. In the Practitioner’s letter to the Applicant dated 22 August 2011, he refers to 29 January as the date on which he received instructions that the first agreement had been “canned”....

3. Marine and Coastal Area - Provisions for protecting customary interests [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...obligations on local government. PCRs and CMT each mean some additional resource consent, planning and monitoring obligations for local government. These obligations primarily fall with regional councils. All applications for PCRs and CMT must be filed no later than six years after the commencement of the Act (sections 95(2) and 100(2)). This provides local authorities with certainty over the extent of applications within their areas and their responsibilities. A number of conseque...

4. [2018] NZEmpC 33 Nisha Alim v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 289 KB]

   ...ZEALAND LIMITED First Defendant AND CHEUNG, SHORT, VERRY LIMITED (FORMERLY PRI FLIGHT CATERING LIMITED) Second Defendant AND TERRY WILLIAM HAY ALSO KNOWN AS TERRY HAY Third Defendant Hearing: (on the documents filed 2, 16 and 21 March 2018) Representation: K Wendt, counsel for plaintiff C Meechan QC and J Douglas, counsel for first defendant D France, counsel for second defendant N Scampion, counsel for third defendant D France,...

5. 2017 NZSSAA 064 (9 November 2017) [pdf, 244 KB]

   ...years, payable at half the married rate. [56] The appeal is upheld. [57] The Authority reserves leave for either party to apply if any quantification of entitlement is required. Costs [58] If the Appellant seeks an order for costs, he should file a memorandum with the Authority setting out his claim, and serve a copy on the Ministry. The Ministry may provide a reply. [59] The Authority notes that the usual principle is that a self-represented litigant cannot recover costs for...

6. Adlam v Niao - Matata Parish 39A 2A Ahu Whenua Trust [2018] Māori Appellate Court MB 478 (2018 APPEAL 478) [pdf, 277 KB]

   ...Matatā and Lot 39A Sec. 2B No. 2B No. 2A Parish of Matatā [2015] Māori Appellate Court MB 59 (2015 APPEAL 59). 4 176 Waiariki MB 226 (176 WAR 226). 5 176 Waiariki MB 226 (176 WAR 226). 2018 Māori Appellate Court MB 480 marked ‘A’ filed in support of the application to Rae Beverly Adlam in favour of the trustees of Matata Parish 39A 2A Ahu Whenua Trust. The argument for Ms Adlam [7] Ms Van, counsel for Ms Adlam, argues that Ms Adlam’s interests are as a discreti...

7. Applicant's upddate on position on section 274 party topics [pdf, 438 KB]

   ...response to the concerns raised. No change. Construction Effects / Management Plans Use of management plans generally VHHL (#33) Kiwi Property Group Limited (#71) (Kiwi has not filed evidence on this sub-topic. VHHL supports the conditions now proposed)  Concerns regarding reliance on management plans  Draft Construction Management Plans were circulated to Council and all submitters for comments o...

8. Munley v CAC 402 & Ors [2016] NZREADT 53 [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...also noted that “if it were not for the fact that [the property] is a bit tired and of mostly plaster construction, the market value would be considerably higher”. [7] Mr Munley undertook due diligence on the property. He inspected Council files; considered photograph records, architectural drawings and documentation regarding rectification of a another property in the same complex; and had conversations with a range of local people, including a structural engineer who lived...

9. [2017] NZSAAA 02 (26 June 2017) [pdf, 270 KB]

   ...question of his education provider’s decision to phase out the degree for which he was studying by 2019 and the impact, if any, of the transitional arrangements. Again, there is nothing in his submissions or in the information available on the file as to the administrative changes that the degree was undergoing to suggest that any of these changes in themselves were the reason why he could not undertake a full-time course in 2017. Once again the reason he was unable to enrol in enough...

10. Trustees of the JS & AJ Hamilton Family Trust v Complaints Assessment Committee 403, Amelia (Margaret) Reeve, Fleur Allinson & Kim Franklin [2017] NZREADT 54 [pdf, 229 KB]

    ...Authority (for forwarding to the trustees) within 20 working days of the date of this decision. [48] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Act, which sets out appeal rights. Any appeal must be filed in the High Court within 20 working days of the date on which the Tribunal’s decision is served. The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rules. __________________ Hon P J Andrews Chairperson...