Search Results

1. [2008] NZEmpC AC 49/08 Clear v Waikato DHB [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...that they had very sketchy if any knowledge of the extent of the history of dysfunction when they began. Ms Cotterall did not know until early October that this was Ms Clear’s fourth complaint. She did not read Mrs Parata’s or Ms Clear’s files before starting the investigation and treated the matter entirely as a new complaint. [74] On 8 September Ms Clear was told that the 32 points in her complaint would be investigated, that Mrs Parata and other staff would be interviewe...

2. [2006] NZEmpC AC 65/06 McAlister v Air New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 139 KB]

   ...engaged in scheduled international air services or non-scheduled international air transport operations for remuneration or hire if the licence holders have attained their 60th birthday. [12] New Zealand has elected not to adopt that standard and has filed a difference to it. This stance is shared with other countries including Australia, Fiji, Japan, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Among those countries which have adopted clause 2.1.10.1 and into which or through whose territorial...

3. [2014] NZEmpC 134 Booth v Big Kahuna Holdings Ltd [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...were drawn to Mr Bowling’s attention. [2] Mr Booth was dismissed and pursued a personal grievance alleging unjustified dismissal and disadvantage. His grievance was dismissed by the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority). 1 Mr Booth filed a challenge to the Authority’s determination. Because the challenge was heard on a de novo basis the evidence was heard afresh. It is fair to say that the case has evolved since its inception. [3] The starting point for each pa...

4. [2014] NZEmpC 157 Howard v Carter Holt Harvey Packing Ltd [pdf, 121 KB]

   DEAN HOWARD v CARTER HOLT HARVEY PACKAGING LIMITED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2014] NZEmpC 157 [29 August 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2014] NZEmpC 157 CRC 5/14 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN DEAN HOWARD Plaintiff AND CARTER HOLT HARVEY PACKAGING LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 28 - 30 July 2014 (heard at Christchurch) Appearances: D Beck, R Boulton and D Mills-Godin

5. LA Provider Manual Part 1 - provider approvals [pdf, 990 KB]

   ...processes and systems in place to:  manage client service requirements and expectations  manage scheduling conflicts  manage complaints  manage conflicts of interest  invoice your time accurately  maintain accurate client files. You will also need to provide copies of your client care letter and/or standard letter of engagement that you provide to legal aid clients. Reference: Regulation 9 Competence and experience All applicants applying for approval as a...

6. CAC402 v Dunham [2016] NZREADT 26 [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...to Mr and Mrs Ogilvy, she would have put a condition in the agreement for sale and purchase giving them time to check out what effect the proposed building work by Mr Keate would have on the property’s view. [71] Four other witness briefs were filed for the defendant but there is no need to cover the content of those. The Case for the Prosecution Charge one – failure to disclose extent of planned building works [72] The Committee submits that the evidence clearly establishes t...

7. Wall v Malone [2010] NZWHT Auckland 21 [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...for several years; the Council had first required Mr Malone to reduce ground levels in February 1998; (2) The Council had noted that there was no specific inspection undertaken of the insulclad cladding nor was there a producer statement on file or anything of a similar nature to give the Council an assurance that the cladding had been properly installed; and (3) By 2003 there was a growing awareness amongst Councils that direct fixed, face sealed cladding systems were not p...

8. Iwi panels technical appendix [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...govern the process. A lot of the training and discussion was about changing from an ‘arrest’ min set to offering offenders another option that cou mean they i n’t nee to attend court. The ILO trained staff in how to use correct Police file procedures for cases referred to a panel. This took a lot of work to get right and ensure that all referral information needed was included and correct, and that referrals were made soon after arrest. He also showed how the panels fit wi...

9. [2020] NZEnvC 170 Smith v Young.pdf [pdf, 7.8 MB]

   ...and forming part of this order. B: Under section 321 of the RMA, these orders remain in force until further order of this court. C: Leave is reserved for any party to apply for further directions. D: Costs are reserved. Any application must be filed within 10 working days, any reply within a further 5 working days, and any final reply within a further 5 working days. REASONS Introduction [1] This application for an enforcement order concerns a landslip on two residential pro...

10. [2021] NZEmpC 77 Fleming v Attorney-General [pdf, 446 KB]

    ...specifically pleaded that she was a homeworker in any of her statements of claim. That is true, but she did claim that she was an employee, and a homeworker falls within that definition. The Human Rights Commission and Council of Trade Unions filed written submissions in advance of the hearing (which was subsequently adjourned part-heard for four months). Both organisations referred at length to the homeworker definition and the possibility that Ms Fleming fell within it. Other t...