Search Results

1. [2017] NZEnvC 032 South Epsom Planning Group Incorporated v Auckland Council [pdf, 32 MB]

   ...conference on this matter to review the responses of the parties in terms of the decision of the Court on this matter [2016] NZEnvC 140 in particular paragraph [220]. [2] It was also timely to conduct a further judicial conference given the time for filing appeals to the Environment Court and the High Court in respect of the PAUP process has now expired. In total there are over 100 appeals and the decision of the Council in relation to the Fletcher's Quarry at Three Kings has b...

2. National Panui December 2021.pdf [pdf, 375 KB]

   ISSN 1175 - 8120 (Print) ISSN 2463-3763 (Online) www.mäorilandcourt.govt.nz www.mäorilandonline.govt.nz DECEMBER | HAKIHEA 2021 The purpose of the National Pänui / Te Pänui ä Motu is to provide notice to interested parties of hearings being conducted in, and applications received by, the Mäori Land Court. Only applications and sittings that were confi rmed at the time of this publication are listed. For more information, please contact your local Mäori Land Court offi ce. Ind

3. Butcher v NZ Transport Agency [2022] NZHRRT 21 [pdf, 586 KB]

   ...person, allow the licensing agent to take a photographic image of the applicant; or (b) if applying online, provide a photographic image of the applicant that complies with the specified requirements of the Director in relation to electronic format, file size, and any other matter. (4) In the photographic image, the applicant must not be wearing sunglasses, a hat, any head coverings, or anything else that obscures the applicant’s face or prevents the photographic image from being a g...

4. OIA-110144.pdf [pdf, 5.5 MB]

   ...information withheld under s9(2)(a). The following publicly available links may also be of interest to you: - ogp.org.nz/latest-news/december-2023-ogp-report-back-event-recording-and- presentation - publicservice.govt.nz/assets/DirectoryFile/New-Zealands-Fourth-Open-Government- Partnership-National-Action-Plan-combined-papers.pdf Please note that this response, with your personal details removed, may be published on the Ministry website at: justice.govt.nz/about/official-infor...

5. [2025] NZLVT 13 - Northview Capital Ltd v Hamilton City Council (21 March 2025) [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   BEFORE THE LAND VALUATION TRIBUNAL AT AUCKLAND I TE TARAIPŪNARA WĀRIU WHENUA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision No. [2025] NZLVT 013 IN THE MATTER of a claim for compensation under s84 of the Public Works Act 1981 BETWEEN NORTHVIEW CAPITAL LIMITED (ENV-2023-AKL-73) Claimant AND HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL Respondent Tribunal: District Court Judge K G Reid (Chairperson) Tribunal Member P J M Mahoney Tribunal Member V M Winiata Hearing: at Hamilton on 22-26 July, 5-9 August and 10

6. [2011] NZEmpC 148 Service and Food Workers Union PSA v Pact Group [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...where issues have been resolved which should assist all parties in their future relationships. For those reasons, my initial inclination is not to make an order for costs. If either party wishes to seek an order for costs, a memorandum should be filed and served within 20 working days after the date of this decision. The other parties will then have a further 15 working days in which to respond. A A Couch Judge Signed at 2.00 pm on 17 November 2011...

7. [2008] NZEmpC WC 15/08 Weston v Fraser [pdf, 59 KB]

   ...will be no order for costs. [51] Once costs have been determined then the Court will deal with the funds that have been paid in. [52] If costs cannot be agreed they may be the subject of an exchange of memoranda, the first of which is to be filed within 60 days from the date of this judgment with a further 30 days to reply. B S Travis Judge Judgment signed at 4.45pm on 4 July 2008

8. Wright v CAC 10056 & Woods [2011] NZREADT 21 [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...discussions about the boundary. He personally had no dealings with Mr and Mrs Woods. He told the Tribunal Ms Wright was very meticulous and detailed in her dealings with purchasers and in her appraisals. [15] The Woods then gave evidence. They had filed a joint brief of evidence and spoke to it. [16] Mrs Woods gave evidence first and told the Tribunal that this was the third property that she and her husband had purchased, the second one in the Titirangi area. She confirmed t...

9. [2015] NZEmpC 194 Tuala v Linfox Logistics (N.Z.) Ltd [pdf, 122 KB]

   ...of an application for a stay of execution AND IN THE MATTER of an application for security of costs BETWEEN VIANNEY TUALA Plaintiff AND LINFOX LOGISTICS (N.Z.) LIMITED Defendant Hearing: (on the papers filed 15 and 29 April and submissions dated 2 and 10 July 2015) Counsel: S Fonua, counsel for the plaintiff M Wisker and L Adams, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 4 November 2015 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A...

10. Masson v REAA & Damerell, Aikin, Lafferty [2013] NZREADT 26 [pdf, 64 KB]

    ...[c] Whether the auctioneer expressly stated that he refused to re-open the auction; and [d] Whether the licensees did all that could be reasonably expected of a salesperson. [20] As Ms Pridgeon put it for the Authority, the briefs of evidence filed on behalf of the licensees and the appellant raise, among other things, the following points: [a] During the auction but prior to the property selling, Ms Aikin approached the appellant to see if she would bid. The appellant told Ms Aiki...