Search Results

1. LCRO 14/2020 CL v BB (18 December 2020) [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...engage the services of a forensic accountant. She argues that she should not have to pay for Mr BB’s time to reach this conclusion. [10] Ms CL complains that Mr BB has not acted promptly enough at times,2 and has extended the time spent on her file “trying to stretch things out”. [11] Her allegations of a lack of duty of care relate to occasions when she says she was asked for information which she had already provided. 1 Letter of complaint (19 November 2018). 2 B...

2. 2021-03-01 ORC - MOC - PC7 - mining permits - annexure E [pdf, 452 KB]

   ...in evidence for all purposes for which the original privilege might be put in evidence. S31 Produced privileges to be open for search – Any person may, for the purpose of inspection, without fee, have access to any current mining privilege filed with the District Land Registrar under this Part of this Act, during the hours and on the days appointed by any regulations for the time being in force under the Land Transfer Act 1952. S32 (1) On the receipt by the District Land R...

3. [2016] NZSSAA 52 (16 June 2016) [pdf, 55 KB]

   ...Special Benefit. [15] At that point, the appellant appealed the decisions of the Benefits Review Committees to this Authority. In fact, the appeal in relation to the first Benefits Review Committee hearing was out of time. We extend time for filing an appeal in relation to that decision. Decision [16] The only issue pursued by the appellant at the appeal hearing was the inclusion of repayments relating to his car in the assessment of Special Benefit. Since the hearing he has...

4. GZ v QP LCRO 226/2015 (2 September 2016) [pdf, 53 KB]

   ...what was to be done with it.3 The Committee noted that Ms GZ agreed to his course.4 [29] The Committee decided to take no further action on the complaint pursuant to s 138(2) of the Act. 1 NZLS file note (23 September 2015). 2 Application for review (28 October 2015). 3 Standards Committee decision (8 October 2015) at [13] and [14]. 4 At [15]. 6 [30] Ms GZ disagrees and has applied for a review. Application for review...

5. [2019] NZEnvC 145 Bunnings Ltd v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   ...Act 1991, the Environment Court orders that the Queenstown Lakes District Council pays the sum of $43,700.00 to Bunnings Limited. B: Under section 286 of the Act this court names the District Court at Queenstown as the court this order may be filed in for enforcement purposes (if necessary). Bunnings Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council - Costs decision 2 REASONS Introduction [1] This proceeding concerns an appeal by Bunnings Limited ("Bunnings") against a...

6. Rudolph - Paihia 2F2B2 [2019] Chief Judge's MB 327 (2019 CJ 327) [pdf, 313 KB]

   ...mistake or omission on the part of the Court or in the presentation of the facts of the case to the Court; and (b) If so, is it necessary in the interests of justice to remedy the mistake or omission. Discussion [12] A review of the application filed in 1984 indicates that James and Kathleen Charlotte Rudolph signed the application before a solicitor in Kaitaia. Kathleen Vivienne Rudolph as the transferee, agreed to the transfer. That application was received in the Māori Lan...

7. LCRO 14/2020 CL v BB (18 December 2020) [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...engage the services of a forensic accountant. She argues that she should not have to pay for Mr BB’s time to reach this conclusion. [10] Ms CL complains that Mr BB has not acted promptly enough at times,2 and has extended the time spent on her file “trying to stretch things out”. [11] Her allegations of a lack of duty of care relate to occasions when she says she was asked for information which she had already provided. 1 Letter of complaint (19 November 2018). 2 B...

8. National Standards Committee 2 v Paulson Wilson [2021] NZLCDT 16 (14 May 2021) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...Prisoner X seeking legal advice regarding a possible appeal against conviction and sentence. Mr Z instructed Ms Paulson Wilson to attend upon Prisoner X and obtain his instructions. Her visit occurred on 15 October 2019 but following a review of the file note prepared by Ms Paulson Wilson, Mr Z determined that without any fresh evidence there were no grounds for an appeal. He asked Ms Paulson Wilson to phone Prisoner X to advise him that he was unable to assist him further. Mr Z...

9. [2020] NZREADT 03 - AJS Rental Realty Ltd (14 February 2020) [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...therefore, been necessary or appropriate to call for further submissions. [2020] NZREADT 03 - AJS Rental Realty Ltd Orders [33] We find the Agency guilty of misconduct under s 73(c)(iii) of the Act. [34] Submissions as to penalty are to be filed and served as follows: [a] On behalf of the Committee, within 20 working days of the date of this decision; and [b] On behalf of the Agency, within 20 working days of receipt of the Committee’s submissions. [35] Counsel are to conf...

10. D J Bethell Family Trust - Rangitatau Waitōtara 3C2B2 and 3C2B3 Trust (2019) 408 Aotea MB 210 (408 AOT 210) [pdf, 188 KB]

    ...[42] The deputy registrar is to convene a meeting of owners on or before 31 January 2020. The purpose of the meeting is to hold an election of trustees and to consider the future use and development of the land. [43] Following the meeting the file will be referred to me along with the draft minutes of the owners’ hui for further directions. [44] Leave is reserved for any party to seek further directions at any time. These orders are to issue immediately, per r 7.5, Māori Land...