Search Results

1. [2020] NZREADT 10 - Kettle (10 March 2020) [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...unsuccessful in obtaining a listing for, was such that if known by the public generally, would [be] likely to bring the industry into disrepute. Accordingly, [Mr Kettle] breached Rule 6.3 and his conduct was unsatisfactory. Appeal [14] In a statement filed with his Notice of Appeal, Mr Kettle contended that the Committee’s decision showed a basic lack of understanding of real estate processes and language, and was wrong to find that he had engaged in conduct that would bring...

2. Cabinet paper: Future of the Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Court [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...27-percentage point lower imprisonment rate compared to matched offenders. 3 w55f2if1v 2019-12-17 14:07:19 RE LE AS ED B Y TH E M IN IS TE R OF JU ST IC E whānau members, treatment providers and justice stakeholders, and reviewed court files. 20. Interviewees rated the AODT Court contribution to improving the lives of graduates and exited participants as good. For example, graduates reported improved self esteem, better relationships with whānau, improved phy...

3. LCRO 188/2019 QK v RJ (13 May 2020) [pdf, 116 KB]

   ...Committee’s decision was that it contained a so-called “serious discrepancy” at paragraph 8. The so-called serious discrepancy was contrived. Applications for probate are dealt with by the High Court. When an application for probate is filed, the High Court also receives a copy of the will. All Ms QK needed to do was contact the High Court or instruct her lawyer to do so. If 1 Sections 162 and 163. 7 probate had been gr...

4. [2019] NZEmpC 109 Downer New Zealand Limited v Livingston [pdf, 256 KB]

   ...Hearing: On the papers Appearances: A Russell, counsel for plaintiff Defendant in person Judgment: 26 August 2019 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS Introduction [1] Downer New Zealand Limited has filed a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority.1 The plaintiff does not seek a full rehearing of the entire matter. Rather, the challenge is directed at the Authority’s finding that two emails were not covered b...

5. Te Manutukutuku Issue 27 [pdf, 2.8 MB]

   ...those Iwi and other Maori authorities who attended the hui which was chaired by Mr Puke. It is strongly supported by the National Maori Congress, the New Zealand Maori Council and the Maori Women's Welfare League. The statement of claim was filed with the tribunal on 19 January 1994. In essence, the claim is that the Crown has an obligation under the Treaty of Waitangi to protect the-right of Maori to be represented in Parliament and that there are special needs in promoting Maori...

6. Te Manutukutuku Issue 13 [pdf, 3.1 MB]

   ...completed its inquiry. REVISED PROGRAMME FOR MURIWHENUA CLAIM The Muriwhenua land claim inquiry has been divided broadly into 19th century and 20th century issues. 19th century programme After claimant and Tribunal-commissioned evidence has been filed, claimant counsel will formulate the issues it wishes the Crown to respond to. The Crown has agreed to respond by June 1992. . June 1992 The Tribunal will hold a conference of parties to settle the issues August 1992 Hearing Sep...

7. Judicial Appointments Protocol Nov 2019 [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...but no other details. Such papers as are required for judicial administrative purposes are transferred to the Chief Justice. All other paper records are transferred to the Solicitor-General, who is personally responsible for the safe keeping of the files. 9 JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS PROTOCOL NOV 2019 THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL’S JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS UNIT The Appointments Unit was set up specifically to handle expressions of interest in judicial appointments with the highest degree...

8. [2019] NZEmpC 171 Thorne v Rolton [pdf, 352 KB]

   ...satisfied that such an outcome would be just in the circumstances. Outcome [40] Mr Thorne’s challenge to the determination is unsuccessful as is his claim for damages. [41] Costs are reserved. If they cannot be agreed Mr Rolton may file a memorandum seeking costs within 15 working days, Mr Thorne can have a further period of 15 working days to respond and any further reply can be provided by Mr Rolton within a further five working days. K G S...

9. [2022] NZEnvC 092 Port of Tauranga Limited [pdf, 302 KB]

   ...allowed or required by the Court or Tribunal; and c) s 27(1)(c) which provides that ss 21 and 24 do not prevent any person who appears under s 27(1)(b) to give advice in relation to the proceedings and give assistance in drafting documents for filing in those proceedings. The ability of a person who can appear before this Court to be represented by someone else under s 275 of the RMA is clearly an exception to the restriction in the LCA on reserved areas of work in relation to...

10. LCRO 158/2020 SA v KC (27 May 2022) [pdf, 199 KB]

    ...if any, significance. [52] Any challenge to the terms of the Deed can not be addressed in this review, nor in the context of a complaint engaging the disciplinary process. [53] Having considered all of the material on the Standards Committee file and provided by the parties on review, and having heard from the parties in person, I reach the same conclusion as the Standards Committee.17 17 The Standards Committee determined pursuant to s 152(2)(c) of the Lawyers and Conveyance...