Search Results

1. [2018] NZEnvC 006 The Wellington Co. Ltd v Save Erskine College Trust [pdf, 23 MB]

   ...subsections (a) to (c) of s 195(3). We will not set them out here because each will be separately considered as we analyse matters during this decision. Agreed Background Facts [18] In the helpful, if rather lengthy statement of agreed facts and issues filed before the hearing, the parties recorded (amongst many other things), background facts that 6 they advised we could rely upon in our decision-making. They were as follows: (a) TWC, through a related company, is the owner of...

2. NZ Core document [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   GE.11-41617 (E) 240311 Core document forming part of the reports of States parties New Zealand* [30 September 2010] * In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not formally edited before being sent to the United Nations translations services. United Nations HRI/CORE/NZL/2010 International Human Rights Instruments Distr.: General 11 March 2011 Original: English H

3. [2019] NZEnvC 206 Lake McKay Station Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 15 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Appearances: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 206 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of appeals pursuant to clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act LAKE MCKAY STATION LIMITED (ENV-2018-CHC-160) HAWTHENDEN FARM LIMITED (ENV-2018-CHC-55) UPPER CLUTHA ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2018-CHC-56) and all other appellants concerning Topic 2 of Stag

4. Joanne Barbara Noble - Evidence in Chief [pdf, 3.2 MB]

   ...Ngati Makino Heritage Trust ("NMHT") and Ngati Ranginui lwi Society appeals; and (b) The Motiti Rohe Moana Trust ("MRMT") appeal. 9. The relief sought by all three appeals has evolved several times since the appeals were first filed in October 2015. For the purpose of this evidence I have taken the relief sought by MRMT to be as outlined in the evidence of Mr Graeme Lawrence in Attachment 6 and 7 (and as amended by his supplementary evidence dated 31 October 20...

5. [2007] NZEmpC AC 52/07 General Distributors Ltd v National Distribution Union [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...decision, leave is reserved to the parties to refer the matter back to the Court. [50] Counsel requested that costs be reserved. If agreement cannot be reached costs can be dealt with by an exchange of memorandum, the first of which is to be filed within 60 days of this decision with a reply within a further 21 days. B S Travis Judge Judgment signed at 2.30pm on 7 September 2007

6. [2007] NZEmpC AC 57/07 CE of the Department of Corrections v Imo [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...motivation for them. For this reason there will be no order for compensation. Costs [87] The question of costs is reserved. Counsel are encouraged to confer and agree on the costs but if this is not possible then counsel for Mr Imo is to file a memorandum as to costs within 21 days of the date of this judgment. The plaintiff has 14 days after that within which to respond. C M Shaw JUDGE Judgment signed at 11.30am on 14 November 2007

7. [2007] NZEmpC CC 26/07 Southern Local Government Officers Union Inc v Christchurch City Council [pdf, 74 KB]

   ...reserved as requested by the parties, but we express the preliminary view that this was in the nature of a test case and that costs should lie where they fall. If the parties do not accept that view then the first memorandum claiming costs is to be filed and served within 30 days of the date of this judgment with a further 30 days for the memorandum in reply. B S Travis Judge for the full Court Judgment signed at 1pm on Thursday 29 November 2007...

8. [2007] NZEmpC AC 17/07 Housham v Juken NZ Limited [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...without prejudice except as to costs, I will reserve the amount of the awards to which Mr Housham should be entitled, first, to allow the parties themselves to attempt to settle these but, if not, to make submissions which should be by memorandum filed on behalf of Mr Housham within 30 days of the date of this judgment with the company having the period of the following 21 days to respond by memorandum. GL Colgan Judge Judgment signed at 4.30pm on Thursday 5 April...

9. [2012] NZEmpC 103 Progressive Meats Ltd v Pohio and others [pdf, 135 KB]

   ...collective agreement and my preliminary view is that costs should lie where they fall but if the defendant wishes to pursue the matter of costs then, in the absence of agreement, Mr Mitchell has 30 days from the date of this judgment in which to file and serve a memorandum and Mr Cleary will have like time from the date of service in which to respond. A D Ford Judge Judgment signed at 11.00 am on 5 July 2012

10. [2012] NZEmpC 156 Newick v Working In Ltd [pdf, 226 KB]

    ...the cause of action complained about remained extant. I accept that further particularisation is required to put the defendant squarely on notice as to the claim it has to meet. The plaintiff must, within 14 days of the date of this judgment, file and serve an amended statement of claim pleading the material facts on which he relies, including reliance on the promise/s said to have been made, how the plaintiff is said to have resiled from such a promise/s, and the detriment said t...