Search Results

1. [2012] NZEmpC 51 New Zealand Cards Ltd v Ramsay [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...has been almost entirely unsuccessful. Mr Ramsay is entitled to a contribution to the costs he has incurred in resisting it. I encourage the parties to agree costs if possible. If they are unable to do so, Mr Ramsay’s representative should file and serve a memorandum within 25 working days after the date of this decision. Mr Beresford is then to have 15 working days in which to provide a memorandum in response. Once the issue of costs has been resolved, I will give directions...

2. [2008] NZEmpC WC 3/08 Tauhore v Farmers Trading Co Ltd [pdf, 64 KB]

   ...therefore conclude that, in all the circumstances, it was justified in dismissing Ms Tauhore from her employment. [69] Ms Tauhore’s challenge to the Employment Relations Authority determination is dismissed. Costs [70] The defendant is file a memorandum as to costs 28 days from the date of this decision. The plaintiff will have 14 days to respond to that. C M Shaw JUDGE Judgment signed at 11am on 25 February 2008

3. [2006] NZEmpC WC 23/06 Spotless Services (NZ) Ltd v Morrison [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...caused Mr Starling and Ms Bryant alarm. It was yet another example of her taking time off work without notice or approval. [30] The next service centre meeting between Ms Morrison and Ms Bryant was held on 30 May 2005. It was recorded fully in a file note. It is apparent that Ms Morrison was by now very unhappy at work. She said: “I F****** hate the place, this is the worst F****** company I have worked for”. She also said the sooner she got out the better, that she want...

4. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 AC rebuttal Mica Plowman [pdf, 5 MB]

   ...and omitted it. It is not a duplicate record. I have corrected this oversight in Annexure B, Table 1 and Figure 1 attached to this rebuttal evidence, locating the site on the basis of the coordinate data included in the original paper site file generated as part of the 2002-6 Auckland City Council Gulf Island Upgrade Project (ACC Upgrade Project 2002-6). The Auckland Council GIS has been updated to correct the site's location. 12. The omission of this site from the ta...

5. Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination – summary record 15th-17th reports (continued) [pdf, 66 KB]

   ...Treaty. 38. A 2006 amendment to the Treaty of Waitangi Act had set 1 September 2008 as the cut-off date for lodging historical claims dating to between 1840 and 1992, the object being to settle all such claims by 2020 and allow Maori sufficient time to file claims, which could later be amended. The Waitangi Tribunal’s jurisdiction had existed since 1985 and was well known among Maori. There was no evidence that the cut-off date would prejudice Maori claimants, nor did it reflect a redu...

6. CAC301 v Mairs [2015] NZREADT 63 [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...also received helpful background briefs from the complainant Mr L Tian, who had been the successful bidder at auction for the apartment. We also received a brief from Mr A T Eales as a senior investigator for the prosecuting Authority. A brief was filed as from the said Mr T W Rees who (as mentioned above) did not appear at the hearing and did not co-operate with the prosecution. [23] Despite the thoroughness of the evidence we received, in particular from the said Messrs Waine and H...

7. [2013] NZEmpC 117 Morgan v Whanganui College Board of Trustees [pdf, 163 KB]

   ...THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN LEE MORGAN Plaintiff AND WHANGANUI COLLEGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES Defendant Hearing: By written memoranda of submissions filed on 30 May and 7, 17 and 21 June 2013 Appearances: David Burton and Fred Hills, counsel for plaintiff Peter Churchman QC, counsel for defendant Judgment: 2 July 2013 JUDGMENT NO 2 OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGAN [1]...

8. Molenaar v CAC 10066 & MacDonald & Newman [2012] NZREADT 74 [pdf, 79 KB]

   ...The appellant required communication by email, although Mr Newman attempted to engage with her by telephone and to meet her. [9] On 24 November 2010 the appellant lodged a complaint by telephone with the Real Estate Agents Authority. She also filed a complaint with the Disputes Tribunal at the local District Court. Counsel for the second respondents understand this is “on hold” pending the outcome of this appeal. [10] The appellant’s complaints before the CAC were broadly t...

9. Orsborn v CAC 20006 & Collier & JVL Prestige Realty Ltd[2013] NZREADT 69 [pdf, 72 KB]

   ...Christine Goulding contacted me again to confirm the front paddock of the property was going to be subdivided off and would not be part of the sale. They wanted this to be part of the adjoining property, which they also owned. She told me they had filed an application for subdivision with the Council that day. 8. On 25 May 2011 I met with Christine again to sign an auction authority form. She filled in the preferred possession date as 22 July 2011 subject to the new title being issu...

10. Lloyd v CAC 10056 & Davies [2012] NZREADT 27 [pdf, 149 KB]

    ...Whether the appellant gave the complainant a proper opportunity to review and confirm the draft offer documentation before signing it. 4 [11] We not only have before us both the material available to the Committee and the further material filed by the appellant for this appeal, but we have had the benefit of hearing further extensive evidence given at the appeal hearing before us. The Decision of the Authority [12] We now set out the following paragraphs from the Authori...