Search Results

1. Lloyd v CAC 10056 & Davies [2012] NZREADT 27 [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...Whether the appellant gave the complainant a proper opportunity to review and confirm the draft offer documentation before signing it. 4 [11] We not only have before us both the material available to the Committee and the further material filed by the appellant for this appeal, but we have had the benefit of hearing further extensive evidence given at the appeal hearing before us. The Decision of the Authority [12] We now set out the following paragraphs from the Authori...

2. CAC 10026 v Dodd [2011] NZREADT 1 [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...supplied with a copy of the loan documents from the bank and can confirm that she did not sign this document. She told us that her signature has been forged. [24] The complainant went on to tell us that in the June 2008 she was going through some files at home when she came across a National Bank loan in the name of the defendant and herself as trustees for the Trust for $69,000 dated 15 April 2008. She said that she did not have a copy of this document and has not been able to obtain...

3. [2013] NZEmpC 242 Udovenko v Offshore Marine Services Ltd [pdf, 153 KB]

   ...consider and determine the plaintiff’s alternative cause of action. [52] Costs are reserved at the request of both parties. If they cannot otherwise be agreed they may be the subject of an exchange of memoranda, with the plaintiff filing and serving any memoranda and material in support within 30 days of the date of this judgment and the defendant within a further 20 days. Christina Inglis Judge Judgment signed at 9.45 am on 16 December 2013...

4. Emery v REAA CAC 20002 & Anor [2014] NZREADT 33 [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...solicitor. [8] The complainant raised the question of pages being missing from the listing agreement; these were only identified by the agency when the complainant asked for a copy of it. The licensees maintain that these pages were mixed up with other files and temporarily misplaced when they withdrew from the listing agreement to discuss the issue of the 50% refund and the complainant’s demand to be released from the remainder of the agency period as explained below. This discussi...

5. IPT Annual Report 2011 [pdf, 456 KB]

   ...Immigration and Protection Tribunal is one of the mechanisms the Act establishes to manage immigration. Hence reference is made to balancing the national interest and the rights of individuals. “Producing” decisions includes considering files, conducting hearings and writing decisions that resolve issues in a fair, impartial, lawful and humane manner. “Publishing” decisions includes making our decisions accessible and understandable to the parties, the profession, r...

6. Paterson v Whangarei District Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 18 [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...above, the plan does not appear to have provided any reasons that would have enabled the Council to satisfy itself that the drainage and waterproofing associated with the retaining wall would be code compliant, and there is nothing on the Council file to show that the Council could satisfy itself of compliance. The Council could have requested a producer statement, or certificates, but it appears not to have done so. [72] The inadequate drainage gave rise to damage from intern...

7. LCRO 113-2017 GN v IG [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...3 Standards Committee decision at [15]. 4 Standards Committee decision at [18]. 5 Standards Committee decision at [19]. 6 Standards Committee decision at [26]. 7 Standards Committee decision at [28]. 9 Application for review [65] Mr GN filed his application for review on 14 June 2017. He submits: (a) The Committee’s decision imposes an extreme burden upon a professional trustee in that, had the funds not been invested on behalf of the trust, there would have been compla...

8. Complaints Assessment Committee 414 v Deepak Goyal [2017] NZREADT 58 [pdf, 235 KB]

   ...scheduled to make appropriate timetable orders. [71] Pursuant to s 113 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008, which sets out appeal rights. Any appeal must be filed in the High Court within 20 working days of the date on which the Tribunal’s decision is served. The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rules. ____________________ ___________________ ____________...

9. Kristina-Lorraine Brook v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 403) & Jason Hynes [2017] NZREADT 66 [pdf, 294 KB]

   ...Mrs Brook’s appeals against the Committee’s substantive and penalty decisions are dismissed. [79] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Act, which sets out appeal rights. Any appeal must be filed in the High Court within 20 working days of the date on which the Tribunal’s decision is served. The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rules. ___________________ ____________________ _____...

10. [2018] NZEmpC 20 Smith v Director General of the Ministry for Primary Industries [pdf, 282 KB]

    ...acted, were what a fair and reasonable employer could have done in all the circumstances at the time when the dismissal occurred. Outcome [95] Mr Smith’s challenge is dismissed. [96] Costs are reserved. In the absence of agreement MPI may file submissions within 20 working days of this judgment. Mr Smith has a further 20 working days to respond. K G Smith Judge Judgment signed at 5.55 pm on 16 March 2018