Search Results

1. AG v ZT LCRO 159 / 2010 (18 February 2011) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...Practitioner submitted that she was required to follow the instructions of her client. The Practitioner stated that H had been determined to leave nothing to the Applicant. 4 Considerations [14] I have considered the Standards Committee file and also the evidence of the parties at the review, as well as submissions made by the Practitioner’s counsel. [15] H consulted the Practitioner to make the will after she had been diagnosed with terminal cancer. The Applicant d...

2. LCRO 242/2014 HW v DL [pdf, 122 KB]

   ...2012, the [Bank 1] borrowing was refinanced through [Bank 2]. The respondent did not act for Mr HW at that time. [8] Mr HW says he did not realise the property had been transferred into his sole name until September 2013, when he uplifted his file, or a copy, from the respondent. [9] Mr and Mrs HW lodged their complaint on 29 January 2014. The complaint and the Standards Committee decision [10] The Committee identified the issues to be addressed as being that Mr DL (the res...

3. Charteris v Rowe - Estate of David Charteris (2018) 181 Waiariki MB 108 (181 WAR 108) [pdf, 314 KB]

   ...interests with the High Court reserving leave to all parties for a number of matters, including in relation to the deceased’s interest in Māori lands, the establishment of a whanau trust. [5] On 19 February 2016, the applicant, Tania Charteris, filed an application to succeed to the deceased on the basis that the administrators of the deceased’s estate had not made an application in the ten-year period since the deceased passed away. The applicant, seeks succession orders in f...

4. [2018] NZEmpC 97 Noble v Ballooning Canterbury.com Ltd [pdf, 312 KB]

   ...company’s position is considerably more vulnerable than that of Mr Noble. The merits [39] The Court’s evaluation of the merits must proceed on the basis of the facts recorded in the determination; no additional evidence has been filed. Accordingly, my consideration of this issue is necessarily limited, and inevitably provisional. [40] Mr Goldstein argues that Mr Noble’s challenge has merit, relying particularly on: a) First, a submission that the email ref...

5. JZ v [Place] Standards Committee [X] LCRO 123/2014 (16 December 2016) [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...(a) the authorities to be given by investors: (b) the information to be given to investors: (c) registration of securities: 2 Different copies of the term loan agreement on the Standards Committee file have different advance dates and dates for payment of interest. This does not affect the nature of the loan as an unsecured loan. 3 Letter DR to ABC Ltd (19 June 2013) at [5]. 3 (d) the prohibition against the taking or holding...

6. The Maori Trustee v Brightwell - Kaipakopako 2C2 (2016) 354 Aotea MB 226 (354 AOT 226) [pdf, 287 KB]

   ...appears to relate to the minutes of a meeting held in respect to Muru Raupatu Pā. She appears to have concerns about its administration. With respect, those matters are not the subject of these proceedings. Accordingly, Ms Brightwell will need to file a separate application in due course should she wish to pursue those issues further. They are not considered further in this decision. Background [5] Kaipakopako 2C2 was created by partition order on 9 August 1943. 1 Kaipakopako...

7. [2016] NZEmpC 117 NZMWU Inc v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...Agreement, 1 May 2012 to 31 December 2013. 4 New Zealand Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO New Zealand Ltd, above n 2, at [110]. 5 At [114]. 6 At [119]. [6] Since the February judgment, various memoranda have been filed with a view to determining the wages which each second plaintiff would have been paid but for the unlawful lockout and unlawful conduct. [7] By May 2016, counsel had agreed that there were preliminary legal issues which were re...

8. Complaints Assessment Committee 403 v Zhang [2018] NZREADT 30 [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...Counsel are to confer and advise the Tribunal whether a hearing is required as to penalty, or if penalty can be determined on the papers. If a hearing is required, a telephone conference will be arranged so that appropriate orders may be made as to filing submissions. [51] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116, which sets out the right of appeal to the High Court. The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rule...

9. [2017] NZEmpC 78 Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections v CANZ Inc [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...securing the defendant’s agreement by a variation. Pursuant to s 183(1) and (2) of the Act the Authority’s determination is set aside and this judgment stands in its place. [49] Costs are reserved. In the absence of agreement, the plaintiff may file a memorandum within 20 working days, with the defendant having the same time to respond. KG Smith Judge Judgment signed at 2.15 pm on 21 June 2017 12...

10. Warbrick - Estate of Rooha Ratahi (2004) 106 South Island MB 197 (106 SI 197) [pdf, 1.7 MB]

    In the Maori Land Court of New Zealand Te Waipounamu District Minute Book: 106 SI 197 RE: An application for succession to Rooha Ratahi Section: 118/93 File: A20030002701 Applicant: Paerau Warbrick DECISION Minutes relating to this application are at 106 81 89 to 94 and the land interests are listed there. The whakapapa recorded is part of a draft which was updated by Mr Warbrick in a further document produced at the hearing. I have added some minute book references and made...