Search Results

1. Fehling v Appleby (Recusal Application) [2014] NZHRRT 11 [pdf, 65 KB]

   ...entirely misconceived basis on which the School acted in evicting him from the Costello property. The recusal application [6] By memoranda dated 6 December 2013 and 30 January 2014 Mr Appleby has submitted: [6.1] While the present proceedings are filed under a different statute (ie the Human Rights Act 1993) there may well be issues of credibility which fall to be determined at the forthcoming hearing. [6.2] Mr Appleby perceives some potential for prejudice if the makeup of the Tri...

2. Balich v Standing [2012] NZIACDT 42 (24 August 2012) [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...same date addressed to the Authority. [22] Mr Standing said that his licence had been cancelled by this Authority, and the company, Living New Zealand Ltd, had gone into liquidation. [23] Apparently as a result of these events he no longer held his file relating to Mr Balich, and could only respond on the basis of recollection. [24] Mr Standing’s response to the complaint appeared to be: [24.1] He had communicated in a timely manner, allowing for some minor and explicable delay....

3. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 60 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 638 KB]

   ...claimant evidence for hearing. The Whanganui casebook research programme included 8 CFRT commissions and 13 Waitangi Tribunal commis- sions started or under way during the year. All projects will be completed by September 2004, and the casebook then filed for review. All going well, the interlocutory process will start in October. East Coast The East Coast district inquiry also made progress, with a substantial CFRT research programme underway. The Tribunal held start-up conferences i...

4. Barnes - Te Horo 2B2B2B Residue (2008) 125 Whangarei MB 11 (125 WH 11) [pdf, 2.8 MB]

   ...directed the Case Manager to complete a full derivation report showing Jack Bal1les' cun'ent interests and any interests that he had transfen'ed to the Te Kaitiaki YVhanau Trust. I did this as there was conflicting infonnation on the file regarding Jack Bal1les' CUll'ent interests and their derivation and those that had been transfen'ed to the uust. [9] In his application Jack Bal1les proposed to transfer his interests in "Te Horo 2B2B2B Residue, A...

5. Macey v Whitehead - Hauiti Marae (2008) 180 Gisborne MB 31 (180 GIS 31) [pdf, 3.1 MB]

   ...reservation is intended to benefit, conduct or order slich inquilY into the administration by any trustee of a ,-ese1vafian, as the Court thinksfil. (2) No inquilY shall be conducled by Ihe COUl'l unless- (a) The applicant/or sllch inquily has filed with the Court a statement, signed by the applicant, containing the detailed grounds upon 'which the applicant requires the inquhy,' and (b) The applicanl has given 10 each Irllstee a copy oflhe applicalion made 10 the COllr...

6. 2018 NZSSAA 001 (9 January 2018) [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...placed on it, and the extent of relief available to the appellant following those findings. [4] The question is now before the Authority pursuant to the consent order of the High Court dated 5 May 2016. That order followed a joint memorandum filed by the parties, and the joint memorandum is referred to in the order. This order of the High Court formulated the issues for the Authority in the following way: 46.2 The matter is remitted to the Authority under High Court Rule 21.14(b)...

7. E43 Mitchell Tse - Auckland Transport - EIC - Council [pdf, 773 KB]

   ...CP24134 AUCKLAND 1678 2 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 My full name is Mitchell Bruce Tse. 1.2 My evidence is given on behalf of the Auckland Council (the Council) in its regulatory capacity in relation to the direct referral application filed by Panuku Development Auckland Limited (Applicant) seeking resource consents for the construction, occupation, use and maintenance of permanent and temporary infrastructure and undertaking of activities within the coastal marine area...

8. [2018] NZEnvC 126 The Wellington Company Limited v Save Erskine College Trust [pdf, 4.9 MB]

   ...We are satisfied that our directions in this regard have been met, and now approve the conditions of consent, inclusive of the changes made to Condition C.28, concerning the bond. [4] For reasons recorded in earlier decisions, the Court's file will remain open until the strengthening and waterproofing of the chapel have been completed, and the conditions met. [5] Leave is granted to any party to apply in need concerning the conditions of consent and implementation of them....

9. LCRO 227/2016 YL and QR v TR [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...the Lawyers Complaints Service “responding to all 3 complaints”, denying the complaint, asserting that the orders under LCRO 109/2011 were not applicable for reasons of non-party status. The submission was copied to the applicants after it was filed, and whereas- (a) The applicants did not have full knowledge of the complaint. (b) They did not have input into the defence. (c) They trusted Mr TT to deal with it appropriately.

10. Unnikrishnan v Goldsmith [2017] NZIACDT 22 (29 September 2017) [pdf, 234 KB]

    ...on which it is reasonably open to conclude that she was merely incompetent. At the core of the allegation that Ms Goldsmith entirely abandoned any ethical standards is the finding that she advised a client not to disclose a conviction. She then filed papers with Immigration New Zealand that were dishonest, as they failed to disclose the conviction. Ms Goldsmith effectively denied she gave the advice, and had no responsibility for the false information. When confronted with evidence,...