Search Results

Search results for Filing.

19391 items matching your search terms

  1. PC7 Hearing notice (updated) [pdf, 237 KB]

    ...of proceedings then the Court may order the party or parties to pay any costs and expenses incurred by the Crown or another party. This may happen where the hearing time allocated by the Court is not used. 3 EVIDENCE Evidence should be filed in accordance with the court’s directions, which are available here: • https://environmentcourt.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Publications/2020-12-02-Minute-Final- Timetable-and-Expert-Conferencing-Directions.pdf • https://environmen...

  2. 2021-04-11 - Opening Representation - Landpro and others 12 April 2021 [pdf, 189 KB]

    ...application process is requiring a substantial amount of information for what is supposed to be a short term 6 year transition period. 15. ORC Consents Officers have recently advised they were considering whether two of the applications we have recently filed for 6 year terms should be rejected under s88 due to their view that because there was no substantial hydrology science work undertaken in the subject waterbodies, the applications could be considered incomplete. 16. This i...

  3. FFNZ - EiC - K L Reilly - 5 Feb 2021 - PC7 Amendments (filed 5 March 2021) [pdf, 201 KB]

    Regional Plan: Water for Otago Proposed Plan Change 7 (Water Permits) 18 March 2020 ii Proposed Plan Change 7 (Water Permits) to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago 18 March 2020 Proposed Plan Change 7 (Water Permits) to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago 18 March 2020 iii Introduction The Otago Regional Council has prepared Proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago.

  5. 2021-03-15 ORC PC7 Hearing Schedule [pdf, 231 KB]

    ...No. Name of Representative Subject (if provided) Position Evidence / Representation Questioning / Cross-Examination Court not sitting in the morning. Time is set adide for counsel and planning witnesses to consider the ORC Supplementry Evidence to be filed. Lunch (12.45pm) ORC *New witness to be called Joanna Gilroy Consenting Lay Evidence TBC ORC *New witness to be called Alexandra King Consenting Evidence TBC ORC *Witness to be recalled Simon Wilson Schedule 10A.4 Evidence TBC DOC...

  6. Justice Matters - issue 05 - December 2016 [pdf, 3 MB]

    ...better. It includes 5 new Acts and 18 amendment Acts. Key features include: • modern language and an accessible structure that’s easier to read and search online • enabling courts and tribunals to use digital documents and electronic case files • enabling District Courts to hear disputes with a value of up to $350,000 (previously $200,000) • combining our 58 district courts into one District Court of New Zealand. This will be Australasia’s largest court; it will hear mor...

  7. [2017] NZEnvC 059 Save Erskine College Trust v Erskine Developments Limited [pdf, 462 KB]

    ...interim enforcement order which had been made by Judge Thompson on 12 December ex parte and on the papers. [3] Further detailed background and essential facts are recorded in my 22 December dec!sion just referred to. Detailed affidavits had been filed on both sides prior to the urgent hearing I conducted just before Christmas. Each party lodged focussed legal submissions about the quite complex interface between HASHAA and the RMA on these matters, and addressed them in the hearing....

  8. AT v RN LCRO 47/2015 (29 September 2016) [pdf, 90 KB]

    ...language, it could find nothing in the words and language used which, judged objectively, could lead to a conclusion that its motivation was to inspire anxiety or that Mr [RN] had breached a duty owed to Mr [AT]. Application for review [14] Mr [AT] filed an application for review on 19 March 2015. In summary, the grounds for review were that: (a) Mr [RN] ought not to have written to Mr [AT] at his home address. (b) [Law Firm A] had confirmed in correspondence that they were act...

  9. Holmqvist v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 403) & Coma [2017] NZREADT 15 [pdf, 229 KB]

    ...back to the Committee for it to undertake an inquiry Outcome [47] The appeal is dismissed [48] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Act, which sets out appeal rights. Any appeal must be filed in the High Court within 20 working days of the date on which the Tribunal’s decision is served. The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rules. ____________________ Hon P J Andrews Chair...

  10. LCRO 59/2016 and 61/2016 DE and QV v Standards Committee (27 September 2018) [pdf, 175 KB]

    ...responsible for ensuring that the firm’s nominee company lending complied with applicable regulations”.1 [11] The firm of FGH Ltd had eight partners at the time the various issues raised by Mr BC arose, but there is no indication on the Committee’s file as to why it proceeded only against the applicants and Mr MO. [12] Mr DE was the Trust Account Partner and the partner “most directly involved in the administration of the nominee company”, but each of the eight partners...