Search Results

1. [2022] NZEmpC 66 Solander Maritime Limited v Munro [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...against Mr Munro, a former employee. The application follows the making of orders in the High Court, which were subsequently rescinded after the Supreme Court judgment of FMV v TZB was drawn to counsels’ attention by the High Court.1 Counsel filed a joint memorandum withdrawing the application seeking 1 FMV v TZB [2021] NZSC 102, [2021] 1 NZLR 466. continuation of the orders in the High Court by consent, on the basis that a claim would be filed in the Employment R...

2. [2022] NZEnvC 184 St Johns Property Group Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...remaining units in the main dwelling beyond those allowed under the 2 Auckland Unitary Plan or otherwise consented by Council to be disestablished. B: Alternatively, the appellant has indicated that resource consent to comply with the AUP may be filed. Any application is to be complied with by 12 December 2022. C: A site inspection will be undertaken at any time after 19 December 2022 at a date that Auckland Council sets to confirm compliance with the agreement. Parties ar...

3. T Ltd v MC [2023] NZDT 614 (23 November 2023) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 6. As an order from the Tenancy Tribunal has not been received and T Ltd has not given any details of its progress with a claim in that Tribunal, this claim is struck out. 7. This order does not prevent T Ltd filing a claim regarding this matter with the Tenancy Tribunal in the future. If the Tenancy Tribunal determines that it is a claim that it does not have jurisdiction to hear and determine then the file can be refiled in the Disputes Tribu...

4. 2024 Decisions of public interest

   Employment Court - Decisions of public interest 2024 [2024] NZEmpC 251 The Chief of New Zealand Defence Force v NZ PSA Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi (Judgment of the full Court, 16 December 2024) COLLECTIVE BARGAINING - PROHIBITED PREFERENCE - terms and conditions should be considered as a whole to determine whether prohibited preference - no preference in the circumstances - PASSING ON - remuneration was passed on to non-union employees - passing on was with the intention of undermining collect

   Located in:

   1. Employment Court >
   2. Judgments >
   3. Decisions of public interest

5. DY v WB LCRO 27 / 2010 (12 July 2011) [pdf, 76 KB]

   ...Complaints Service, and again by this Office, was incorrect. [12] Previous decisions of this Office have discussed this matter and firmly established firmly that this Office has no discretion to extend the date by which applications for review must be filed, regardless of the circumstances. [13] The most helpful of these is D v T LCRO 36/09 in which the LCRO discusses whether the conduct of this Office can have any bearing on whether or not the application was properly made. At...

6. Appointment as representative [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...Home Address Occupation Respondent Full name Home Address Occupation Associated Respondent (if applicable) (Leave this section blank if it does not apply.) Full name Home Address Occupation COURT USE ONLY: Date document is filed: (Court stamp) PAGE 2Application for appointment as representativeV1 June 2019 This document is filed by: Name  Address for service   If filed by lawyers: Name of acting lawyer  Contact number  PAGE 3Application for appoi...

7. [2024] NZEnvC 062 Gisborne District Council v China Foresty Group New Zealand Company Limited [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...application for access to Court documents is granted. B: The following documents are to be released to Stuff Limited: (a) the applications for enforcement orders, including the names of the forests and the Respondents involved. (b) the memorandum filed on behalf of Timbergrow Limited, Chiong Yong Tiong and Ernslaw One Limited dated 13 December 2023. REASONS Introduction [1] These matters concern applications for enforcement orders by Gisborne District Council. The application a...

8. Hunter v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to Appeal to High Court) [2025] NZACC 97 (13 June 2025) [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...Hunter’s entitlement to weekly compensation arising out of his accident on 29 March 2015. [2] If Mr Hunter wished to appeal that decision to the District Court, section 151(3)(a) of the Accident Compensation Act 2001 (the Act) required him to file a notice of appeal against the Reviewer’s decision within 28 days after a copy of the decision was provided to him. That date was 17 January 2023. [3] In the event, Mr Hunter did not file a notice of appeal until 22 January 2025...

9. [2012] NZEmpC 62 Quan Enterprises Ltd v Fair [pdf, 70 KB]

   ...dated 27 February 2012 and 12 March 2012 Counsel: Jennifer Wickes, counsel for the plaintiff Julie Olds, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 23 April 2012 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A D FORD [1] On 15 February 2012 the plaintiff filed a formal notice pursuant to cl 18 of sch 3 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act) withdrawing this proceeding. Counsel for the defendant, Ms Olds, subsequently filed application seeking an award of costs and Ms Wickes has filed...

10. [2009] NZEmpC AC 29/09 Ogilvy NZ Ltd v Whitten [pdf, 26 KB]

    OGILVY NZ LTD V WHITTEN AK AC 29/09 14 August 2009 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 29/09 ARC 30/09 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file challenge out of time BETWEEN OGILVY NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Applicant AND MARGARET WHITTEN Respondent Hearing: By submissions filed on 22 June, 17 and 20 July 2009 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Chris Patterson, counsel for applicant Susan Hornsby-Geluk, counsel for respondent Judgment: 14 August...