Search Results

1. Cabinet Paper Reforming the Privacy Act 1993 [pdf, 360 KB]

   ...59). Referral to the Director of Human Rights Proceedings 84. If the Commissioner is unable to settle a complaint, the matter can be referred to the Director of Human Rights Proceedings (the Director) to determine whether proceedings should be filed in the Tribunal. The Law Commission considers that the current complaints resolution process results in duplication and delays, and recommended removing the Director’s role from privacy complaints. Instead, the Commissioner would dec...

2. [2013] NZEmpC 81 Brake v Grace Team Accounting Ltd [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...fixed fees that could not be on-charged. He had discussed these with Mr Michael Grace. He considered there was little they could do to change the contracts and that they had to hold the matter over until a more complete review of the client’s files could be done in mid-late March 2010. He claimed that the report from Mr Michael Grace and Ms Retter of the review of the work schedule for 2010/2011 demonstrated that if assignments were performed to budget, GTA had significant over...

3. Tapiki and Eru v New Zealand Parole Board [2019] NZHRRT 5 [pdf, 403 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2019] NZHRRT 5 Reference No. HRRT 030/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN JUDITH ANN TAPIKI FIRST PLAINTIFF AND JOSEPHINE ERU SECOND PLAINTIFF AND NEW ZEALAND PAROLE BOARD DEFENDANT AT NEW PLYMOUTH BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Ms GJ Goodwin, Member Mr BK Neeson JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Ms JA Tapiki and Ms J Eru in person Ms VJ Owen for defendant DA

4. Children and young people with charges finalised in any court December 2018 [xlsx, 262 KB]

   ...282 of the Act can be ordered when a child/young person admits their offending and successfully completes the plan agreed in their Family Group Conference. The absolute discharge means it is as if the charge against the child or young person was never filed. - an order under section 283 of the Act may occur when a child/young person commits more serious offences or they don't stick to their Family Group Conference plan. This is used when a child/young person admits their offending or the j...

5. Children and young people with charges finalised in the Youth Court December 2018 [xlsx, 254 KB]

   ...282 of the Act can be ordered when a child/young person admits their offending and successfully completes the plan agreed in their Family Group Conference. The absolute discharge means it is as if the charge against the child or young person was never filed. - an order under section 283 of the Act may occur when a child/young person commits more serious offences or they don't stick to their Family Group Conference plan. This is used when a child/young person admits their offending or the j...

6. LCRO 87/2018 QZ v FZB (20 December 2019) [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...mechanism” until the trustees provided RP with an indemnity, the Committee concluded that because the interest claimed in the caveat “evidence[d]…a proper purpose”, Mr QZ had not contravened r 2.3.25 Application for review [41] Mr QZ filed an application for review on 21 May 2018. He seeks a “correction” of the Committee’s findings. He asks that his absence from his office towards the end of March, and early April 2017 for health reasons be taken into account.

7. IWCNZ-Submissions-on-Scope.pdf [pdf, 366 KB]

   1 Submissions of the Islamic Women’s Council of New Zealand (IWCNZ ) to the Coronial Inquiry into the Scope of Coronial Hearing 8 February 2022 Introduction 1 The scope of the inquiry, opened into the deaths of each of the 51 people who died as a result of the Christchurch terrorist attacks on 15 March 2019, has not yet been finally determined. On 28 October 2021 Judge Marshall issued a minute, intended only as a “starting point”.1 Judge Marshall anticipated “

8. LCRO 119/2021 FE v AD of [Firm 1] (14 October 2022) [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...confidential; and (h) there was not a more than negligible risk that disclosure of that information could be made, and that the fiduciary obligations owed to Mr FE in his personal capacity would be undermined. Application for review [23] Mr FE filed an application for review on 10 August 2021. [24] He submits that: (a) whilst he did not take issue with Mr AD continuing to act for Mr LM in the [XG] dispute, he did object to Mr AD continuing to act for [XG]; and (b) the Comm...

9. Jessup v Accident Compensation Corporation (Work Related Gradual Process Injury) [2024] NZACC 005 [pdf, 289 KB]

   ...surgery”, and that there was “no evidence of a neuromuscular conduction disorder”. [17] On 27 May 2015, Dr Timmings considered that no action was needed from a neurological point of view. [18] On 3 August 2018, Dr Olof Rydin, Mr Jessup’s GP, filed a claim for cover for a work-place gradual process injury, being chronic organic solvent neurotoxicity as a result of Mr Jessup’s work as a spray painter in the air force. [19] On 14 August 2018, Mr Jessup completed a claimant...

10. 13.-Evidence-of-Mr-Phil-Peet-Transport.PDF [PDF, 1.3 MB]

    ...effects assessment necessarily must consider the impacts at a future year, where additional growth and infrastructure improvements will have occurred. Assumptions in relation to these aspects were included in the Traffic Modelling Assumptions File Note which I circulated to HDC and KCDC representatives, including Mr Kelly, to get confirmation that the assumptions in relation to infrastructure and timing were correct. This specifically noted the inclusion of Tara-Ika in the growth...