Search Results

1. Lewis - Otamatea B2B3 (2025) 298 Taitokerau MB 253 (298 TTK 253) [pdf, 256 KB]

   ...right of way by use of that right of way by the Otamatea D5 block owners or their invitees shall be remedied by the Otamatea D5 block owners without delay or cost to Mr Lewis and / or successors in title to Mr Lewis. [50] The uncontested evidence filed in support of the application, was that the Lewis family have paid for constructed and maintained not only the driveway across the Otamatea D5 block but also the boundary area which abuts the driveway which is some 100 metres. Kō...

2. Cue v Accident Compensation Corporation (Personal Injury) [2025] NZACC 095 (10 June 2025) [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...for additional cover within the statutory timeframes and, therefore, he had (from 21 June 2023) deemed cover for his left shoulder supraspinatus tendon tear. [28] On 14 August 2023, Mr Ray Fong, Orthopaedic Surgeon, reviewed Mr Cue’s claim file and made the following comments: In summary Aaron is suffering from his left shoulder subacromial impingement, subacromial subdeltoid bursitis and rotator cuff tendinopathy/partial tear. This clinical picture represents a gradual process...

3. Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee v Fletcher [2013] NZLCDT 16 [pdf, 132 KB]

   ...him and whether the ultimate sanction of striking off the roll of Barristers and Solicitors needs to be imposed. [14] For his part Mr Fletcher submitted that there had been “a temporary lack of focus on his part”. In a lengthy affidavit filed only a day prior to the hearing Mr Fletcher had this to say:3 “... Over a period of no more than a few weeks from December 2002 to February 2003, I lost my objectivity in the way I handled Mr Hohepa and his express instructions.” [...

4. Sothern v Accident Compensation Corporation (Work Related Gradual Process Injury) [2025] NZACC 154 (22 September 2025) [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...2024, review proceedings were held. On 19 December 2024, the Reviewer found that there was insufficient evidence to prove on the balance of probabilities that Mr Sothern’s condition was caused by a WRGPI. [21] On 16 January 2025, Mr Sothern filed a Notice of Appeal. [22] On 6 March 2025, Mr Hirner noted that, following a discussion with Mr Sothern regarding his shoulder injury, he considered that “there is a possibility that this is related to a gradual process injury that m...

5. [2013] NZEmpC 234 Gazeley v Oceania Group (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 320 KB]

   ...dismissed. 1 There was a subsequent determination ordering her to pay the sum of $32,954 to Oceania as a contribution towards its costs and disbursements. 2 Execution of that costs determination was later stayed by the Court. 3 [6] Mrs Gazeley filed challenges to the determinations. She sought a de novo hearing. She had also previously applied unsuccessfully for interim reinstatement. 4 The pleadings [7] The final form of pleadings consists of an amended statement of c...

6. Putman v Jenmark Homes Ltd [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...that there has not been compliance with the Harditex Technical Information sheets for the Harditex system to such a degree that that has allowed water ingress and caused damage. 5.24. Jenmark Response 5.24.1. Jenmark Homes Limited did not file any response pursuant to s28 of the WHRS Act nor give any indication of the basis of any defence until well into the hearing. Indeed as we have said, it was not represented at the hearing until Mr Dent appeared on its behalf and wi...

7. ENV-2018-AKL-000149 Fulton Hogan Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 7.9 MB]

   ...recommendations July 2016. The reasons are also set out in the Summary and Overview sections of this report. Those reasons are not repeated here. 3. Vegetation management - regional vs district plan rules 3.1. Statement of issue A number of submitters filed legal submissions and evidence relating to the rules for vegetation management; whether they were appropriate and, if so, should they be regional or district plan rules. J Webber and A Murray opposed the application of the Significant...

8. ENV-2018-AKL-000150 Brookby Quarries Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 8.3 MB]

   ...recommendations July 2016. The reasons are also set out in the Summary and Overview sections of this report. Those reasons are not repeated here. 3. Vegetation management - regional vs district plan rules 3.1. Statement of issue A number of submitters filed legal submissions and evidence relating to the rules for vegetation management; whether they were appropriate and, if so, should they be regional or district plan rules. J Webber and A Murray opposed the application of the Significant...

9. [2024] NZEnvC 293 Waimarino Queenstown Limited (as successor to B Property Group Ltd) v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 648 KB]

   ...Issue: 21 November 2024 _______________________________________________________________ SECOND INTERIM DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT _______________________________________________________________ 2 A: The suite of consent conditions filed following the court’s first interim decision are not accepted. B: The court has redrafted a further ‘draft’ version of the land use consent conditions (which includes as an appendix, the amended subdivision / consent notice condi...

10. Electoral-Matters-Bill_Communications-Tranche-45.pdf [pdf, 27 MB]

    ...1 Williamson, Katrina From: Eoin Welsh [TSY] <Eoin.Welsh@treasury.govt.nz> Sent: Thursday, 29 May 2025 3:30 pm To: Huffine, Leigh Subject: RE: Consultation on LEG paper: Electoral Matters Bill - feedback requested by 23 May Categories: Filed IN CONFIDENCE Thanks very much for sharing this, Leigh. Was helpful to see, but we’ve no further comments. Looking forward to seeing the Bill when ready. Thanks! Ngā mihi, Eóin IN CONFIDENCE From: Huffine, Leigh <...