Search Results

1. Reihana-Ngatote - Okahu 1, 3B2B2A, 3B2B2C, 3B2B2D, 4A, 4B, 4D, 4C1, 4C2, 3A3B2A (2016) 132 Taitokerau MB 120 (132 TTK 120) [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...met but the responsible trustees could not agree on that point. There was then a split amongst the four responsible trustees as to whether they should meet separately from the advisory trustees or together. Also, during this period Mr Mahoney filed an appeal against my 9 March 2015 decision, and this may have added to the responsible trustees’ inertia. 5 Far North District Council – Okahu 3B2B2 (2015) 97 Taitokerau MB 234 (97...

2. Bullent v Standing [2012] NZIACDT 54 (30 August 2012) [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...of business and has been dishonest throughout.” The response [30] Mr Standing’s response to the complaint was an email dated 20 December 2011, addressed to the Authority. The email states: “As per previous complaints, I do not hold the files for these applicants and therefore [I am] not in a position to comment in any great detail. However, I can state that to the best of my knowledge there was never [any] misleading information given nor was I ever incompetent or in breach o...

3. Hunstanton v Cambourne and Chester LCRO 167 / 2009 (10 February 2010) [pdf, 71 KB]

   ...a number of people within the firm. Their charge-out rates differed from $180 per hour to $250 per hour. These hourly rates were referred to by Mr YY in his report. This was a proper reflection of the attributes of the lawyers who worked on the file and no further adjustment was necessary. The reasonable costs of running a practice [46] While this matter will be of relevance to the setting of any fee, it does not require special consideration in this case. Any fee agreement ente...

4. ENV-2016-AKL-000TBA Radiata Properties Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 8.2 MB]

   ...in (a) above be accepted and adopted, subject to any modifications considered by the Court to be necessary and appropriate to achieve a sustainable management outcome in terms of Part 2 RMA. (c) Costs. 11. An electronic copy ofthis notice is filed on the designated electronic address at the Auckland Registry of the Environment Court and is served today by email on the Auckland Council at unitaryplan@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz. Waivers and directions have been made by the Environment...

5. LCRO 174/2017 DN v CI [pdf, 328 KB]

   ...to terminate the Agreement; and (b) having received advice from Ms CI about retrieving the deposit, it was up to Mr DN to decide whether to follow that advice or take the matter up with the Broker himself. Application for review [15] Mr DN filed an application for review on 13 September 2017. He repeats that he wants the deposit of $20,000 returned to him and restates his concerns with Ms CI’s legal services. [16] To the extent that he raises new matters, he claims that Ms...

6. Tom de Pelsemmaeker - Recommended changes to PC7 (tracked) (4 March 2021) [pdf, 338 KB]

   ...for the proposal. The coding used is that contained in the Summary of Decisions table prepared for the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) and published on the EPA website. Some of these footnote references have been corrected since the filing of Evidence in Chief. Where “consequential amendment” is noted, the amendment is a necessary consequence of a submission-based recommended amendment so that the overall integrity of the plan change is maintained and/or to ensure...

7. Tom de Pelsemaeker - Recommended changes to PC7 (clean) (4 March 2021) [pdf, 308 KB]

   ...for the proposal. The coding used is that contained in the Summary of Decisions table prepared for the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) and published on the EPA website. Some of these footnote references have been corrected since the filing of Evidence in Chief. Where “consequential amendment” is noted, the amendment is a necessary consequence of a submission-based recommended amendment so that the overall integrity of the plan change is maintained and/or to ensure...

8. [2021] NZACC 32 - Fisher v ACC (9 February 2021) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...of more precise assessment. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. The decision of 5 December 2016 is quashed with the result that cover for work-related hearing loss is granted. [72] Should there be any issue as to costs, counsel have leave to file memoranda in respect thereof. Judge C J McGuire District Court Judge Solicitors: P Sara, Barrister and Solicitor, Dunedin for the appellant Young Hunter, Solicitors, Christchurch for the respondent 3...

9. Peacocke - Part Puketiti 2B2B 1 [2021] Maori Appellate Court MB 48 (2021 APPEAL 48) [pdf, 300 KB]

   ...Kopua (1978) 15 Ruatoria MB 238 (15 RUA 238). 2021 Māori Appellate Court MB 53 evidence that, as at 31 October 1980, Ian Walsh was seised of an estate in fee simple in the block. [7] We note that no appearance was made, or submissions filed, on behalf of descendants of Puku Doherty.10 Ngā take mo te pīra nei Issues on appeal [8] The issues to determine are as follows: (a) Did the 1980 instrument of transfer take effect in accordance with its tenor? (b) Does s 2(2)...

10. Mangatawa Papamoa Incorporation - Mangatawa Papamoa Incorporation (2006) 84 Tauranga MB 172 (84 T 172) [pdf, 1 MB]

    ...incorporation blocks and was purchased by the Incorporation in 1966. [5] In the past few years the Incorporation has been considering how the Asher Block can be developed. At one time an application for a change of status of the Asher Block was filed with the Court, with the possible intention of selling the block at a later date. Since that time the Incorporation has appointed a Chief Executive, Jonathan Rishworth, who has undertaken an extensive review of the Incorporation's op...