Search Results

1. LCRO 21/2019 IV v EC and HL (21 December 2020) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...instructions from Mr IV’s daughter to prepare Powers of Attorney appointing persons, including herself, to be Mr IV’s attorneys. • Ms EC attended at the hospital on the morning of 7 November with the documents • Ms EC has not provided any file notes made at the time • Ms EC relied on her own assessment of Mr IV’s capacity and did not seek any medical advice. [45] Ms EC’s actions were less than satisfactory. In different circumstances there would be a finding...

2. [2019] NZREADT 54 - Houliston v CAC 1901, Lohmann & Webb (10 December 2019) [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...brought against the decision of the Complaints Assessment Committee 1901 (the Committee). On 8 July 2019, the Committee decided under s 89 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 (the Act) to take no further action with regard to a complaint that had been filed by Mr Houliston against the second respondents. [2] The background to the complaint is as follows. Mr Webb and Mr Lohmann were involved in the sale of a property at 32 Hunter Avenue, Richmond through a company by which they were...

3. Affirmation of Lonnie Dalzell 26 5 2020 [pdf, 294 KB]

   ...respect of the Application. AFFIRMED at PO'l<c:;. fk.J,,'--t/vv this 26th day of May 2020 before me: ~urt of New Zealand Graham John Mowbray Solicitor PARAPARAUMU Page 5 Q horizons t•OtOl'l41 e•unc:11 REPORT FILE: APP-2017201552.00 DATE: TO: FROM: 24 March 2020 Nie Peet Jasmine Mitchell "LD1" This is the document marked "LD1" and referred to in the altached Affirmal!on of LONNIE WILLIAM D'WAYNE DALZELL of Ra...

4. Justice Matters - issue 13 - December 2018 [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   ...positively received across the board. Melissa Poole, Principal Tenancy Adjudicator, has been pleased with the results to date. “Resolve has benefited the Tenancy Tribunal in a number of ways. It has eliminated the burden of moving thousands of paper files between Tenancy Services (MBIE) and the Tribunal registry in various locations [in the Ministry]. The ‘one process’ nature of tenancy application processing now affords a level of oversight and visibility not previously availa...

5. Kruger v Nikora - Tuhoe -Te Uru Taumatua [2021] Māori Appellate Court MB 444 (2021 APPEAL 444) [pdf, 296 KB]

   ...see the apology at clause 5.6 of the deed of settlement between the Crown and Ngāi Tūhoe dated 4 June 2013. 3 Moke v The Trustees of Ngāti Tarāwhai Iwi [2019] Māori Appellate Court MB 265 (2019 APPEAL 265). its trustees.4 After filing an appeal to this Court, TUT sought and was granted by the Māori Land Court a partial stay of these orders, resulting in the election for one of the trustees being put on hold until this appeal is determined.5 The second issue to determ...

6. [2022] NZACC 68 – Broughton v ACC (28 April 2022) [pdf, 233 KB]

   ...paper-based assessments to the contrary. [49] The appeal is therefore allowed, and the review decision is set aside. [50] Mr Broughton is entitled to costs. If these cannot be agreed within one month, I shall determine the issue following the filing of memoranda. P R Spiller District Court Judge Solicitors: Ford Sumner, Wellington, for the respondent.

7. [2022] NZEnvC 079 Woolworths New Zealand Limited [pdf, 320 KB]

   ...be able to confine the matters in issue. These differences may have costs implications. The Council’s application [10] The Council lodged an application seeking costs against Woolworths, in relation to the costs incurred subsequent to the filing of the s87F reports. The 3 Mainpower NZ Ltd v Hurunui District Council [2012] NZEnvC 56. 4 Re Canterbury Cricket Association Incorporated [2014] NZEnvC 107. 5 Re Skydive Queenstown Limited [2014] NZEnvC 186. 6 Re Waiheke Marinas...

8. McCaw Lewis - Rakautatahi 1B2B1A (2022) 97 Takitimu MB 232 (97 TKT 232) [pdf, 499 KB]

   ...Orders [47] Pursuant to s 311(1) of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993, the Court makes an order for the exchange of 557 m² (more or less) of land between Rakautatahi 1B2B1A and Rakautatahi 1B2B1B, as depicted in the boundary adjustment scheme plan filed with the application. I whakapuaki i te 4.00 pm i Te Whanganui-a-Tara, tekau mā iwa o ngā rā o Hōngongoi i te tau 2022. D H Stone JUDGE

9. 2022-04-01 ORC - Closing Submissions [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...Queenstown Lakes district in Rule 14.5.1.1(a)(ii). This appears to be an afterthought on the part of the Developers whose opening legal submissions did not refer to seeking a slope standard at all. 48 Whilst there may be scope in other submissions filed by other parties on PC8 to include amendments to the PC8 to include a slope threshold relative to the area of earthworks, the Council continues to support the PC8 rules as proposed by the Council without the inclusion of a slope...

10. [2021] NZEmpC 102 Crossen v Yangs House Ltd [pdf, 283 KB]

    ...not being addressed. In those circumstances, the only option available is to dismiss the challenge. Outcome [73] Both challenges are dismissed. [74] Costs are reserved. If either party considers costs should be pursued, memoranda may be filed proposing a timetable for exchanging submissions, although the parties are reminded that the Legal Services Act 2011 applies. K G Smith Judge Judgment signed at 2 pm on 7 July 2021