19427 items matching your search terms
" , I i I " ,: I i, I ; I , i i , I , , i ' \ ~ " I I, i : I , I : i I ' i ! I ; I RANGAHAUA WHANUI NATIONAL THEME D THE CROWN'S RIGHT OF PRE-EMPTION AND FITZROY'S WAIVER PURCHASES ROSE DAAMEN 'AUGUST 1998 FIRST RELEASE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES Other Rangahaua Whanui reports District reports District 1: Auckland (pt I), R Daamen, P Hamer, and Dr B Rigby; (pt 11), M Belgrave Distri
Evaluation of the Target Hardening Pilot Programme Cathy Casey, Bhavani PaulRaj and Susie Jacka Institute of Public Policy Auckland University of Technology with Tanya Segessenmann Ministry of Justice ii First published in April 2004 by the Ministry of Justice PO Box 180 Wellington New Zealand © Crown Copyright ISBN
Ta A Privy Council Appeal No 9 0/2006 David Cullen Bain The Queen v. FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND JUDGMENT OF THE LORDS OF THE JUDICIAL COMMITTEE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL Delivered the 10th May 2007 Present at the hearing:- Lord Bingham of Cornhill Lord Rodger of Earlsferry Baroness Hale of Richmond Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood Sir Paul Kennedy [Delivered by Lord Bingham of Comhill] Appellant Respondent 1 . On 29 May 1995, following a trial before
...reference to the Environment Court OF BETWEEN Waiheke Marinas Limited APPLICANT AND Jennifer TOKA S 274 PARTY NOTICE UNDER S 274 OF A WISH TO BE PARTY TO PROCEEDINGS. NEXT EVENT DATE: REGISTRAR: R. GRIFFITHS Dated: 11 th January 2014 Filed by: Jennifer TOKA, Person acting: Jennifer TOKA, 23 Shelly Beach Road, Ostend, Waiheke Island, 1081, Auckland, New Zealand, 1. No: 0001 1 FORM 33 NOTICE OF PERSON'S WISH TO BE PARTY TO PROCEEDINGS Section 274, Reso...
1 Regulatory Impact Statement Vulnerable Children's Bill -Child Harm Prevention Orders Agency disclosure statement This Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) was prepared by the Ministry of Justice. It provides an analysis of options to address concerns around people who have been: • convicted of, or found on the balance of probabilities (more likely than not) to have committed, a specified offence, against a child or children; and • who pose a high risk
...challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN RICKY BLACKMORE Plaintiff AND HONICK PROPERTIES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 25 October 2011 (Heard at Hamilton) and by memoranda of submissions filed on 3 and 10 November 2011 Appearances: Gregory Bennett, advocate for plaintiff Erin Burke, counsel for defendant Judgment: 24 November 2011 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGAN [1] This judgment, in a proceeding removed...
IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 176 EMPC 134/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN LEAN MEATS OAMARU LIMITED Plaintiff AND NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS AND RELATED TRADES UNION INCORPORATED Defendant Hearing: 3 September 2015 (heard at Christchurch) Appearances: J L Bates, counsel for the plaintiff P Churchman QC, counsel for the de
...was no independent value. ARL was faced with a circumstance where there was no known offer value, nor was there any other value available that was known to be acceptable to the vendors other than the asking price. 26. Indeed the submissions as filed on behalf of the REAA accept at [5.10] that in the absence of an offer price a licensee could enter the asking price as the provisional value. The REAA then notes that the asking price would need to be amended throughout negotiations unti...
...respectfully advises the Court that as a result of the agreement above, it adopts the following position: a. AT does not oppose the amended Marina proposal on the basis that the agreed conditions as to traffic matters are imposed; b. AT will file no further evidence in relation to this proceeding; and c. AT propose to take no further part in the hearing, other than as required by the Court. Jeremy Brabant Counsel for Waiheke Marinas Limited 1 Nicky Mclndoe Counsel for...
...that the areas were public roads. The background was that title to Moeraki block was investigated on 19 March 1887. The Court did not make any orders laying off roadways. The land was partitioned into 45 allotments as per the survey plan later filed dated July 1889. The plan was approved by Judge Mackay and signed by the Chief Surveyor on 17 June 1890. [54] Judge Smith relied on s 96 of the 1886 Act. I set out ss 93 to 96 of that Act: Public 93 From and out of land which has...