Search Results

1. [2021] NZEmpC 95 Concrete Structures (NZ) Ltd v Rottier [pdf, 365 KB]

   ...he “may” not pass a drug test, a fact he also confirmed in cross-examination. [32] As to the timing of when Mr Rottier was asked to take a drug test, I prefer Mr Henderson’s evidence. It is consistent with a somewhat brief and sanitised file note Mr Henderson prepared later in the day, which suggested that the issue relating to the taking of a drug test arose immediately after the argument about whether Mr Rottier had been lying. It contains reference to the response given...

2. [2021] NZREADT 55 – Lammas v Real Estate Agents Authority (6 December 2021) [pdf, 340 KB]

   ...[113] The Tribunal issued a Minute (20 July 2021) in the first appeal (READT 011/2021) accepting the late appeal. [114] A further Minute (10 September 2021) was issued in both appeals. An oral hearing was directed and a timetable was set out as to filing submissions. [115] The Tribunal issued a Ruling (10 September 2021) declining an order prohibiting the publication of names. [116] The COVID-19 restrictions on the Tribunal’s ability to hold hearings led to the form of hear...

3. [2021] NZEmpC 199 Lawton v Steel Pencil Holdings Ltd [pdf, 415 KB]

   ...sums not quantified or claimed in respect of subsequently accrued amounts of annual leave/holiday pay, arising from the employment down to 31 May 2020 and additional sums in respect of the notice paid on termination. [10] Mr Lawton subsequently filed a statement of problem in the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) seeking wages, holiday pay and expenses from SPHL. He also sought penalties and damages. Mr Lawton included Mr Stock as a respondent in those proceedings...

4. L v EQC [2021] CEIT-2019-0036 [pdf, 411 KB]

   ...evidence simultaneously, and from John West, an EQC loss adjuster. Mr West has worked at EQC since 2018, and his evidence referred to the EQC’s records and his knowledge of EQC processes. Mr West advised that none of the EQC staff involved in the file in 2012 and 2013 still work for the EQC. Both parties also supplied documentary evidence, which included copies of the invoices submitted to the EQC and transcripts of the recorded interviews carried out by Ms McMullon. Mr West [36...

5. Proposals against incitement of hatred and discrimination - discussion document [pdf, 408 KB]

   ......................................15 There is an appendix that goes into more detail on the legal changes .............................16 Proposals that relate to the incitement of hatred .............................................................17 file:///X:/Civil%20Law%20and%20Human%20Rights%20Team/Hate%20Speech%20-%20post%20Election%202020/5%20-%20AMs,%20BRs%20and%20Cab%20papers/Final%20DD%20and%20Summary%20Doc/20210524%20Incitement%20of%20Hatred%20and%20Discrimination%20Discussion...

6. E v IAG New Zealand Ltd (3rd decision – quantum) [2019] CEIT-2019-0013 [pdf, 596 KB]

   1 IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL CEIT-0013-2019 IN THE MATTER OF CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL ACT 2019 BETWEEN PFWE AND JEE Applicant AND IAG NEW ZEALAND LIMITED First Respondent AND AND INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT NEW ZEALAND LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) Second Respondent QBE INSURANCE (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED (REMOVED) Third Respondent AND

7. [2023] NZEmpC 20 Henry v South Waikato Achievement Trust [pdf, 385 KB]

   VIRGINIA HENRY v SOUTH WAIKATO ACHIEVEMENT TRUST [2023] NZEmpC 20 [22 February 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 20 EMPC 301/2021 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN VIRGINIA HENRY Plaintiff AND SOUTH WAIKATO ACHIEVEMENT TRUST Defendant Hearing: 10–12 and 18 August 2022 (Heard at

8. FDR Operating Guidelines [pdf, 713 KB]

   ...FDR. Parties can attend FDR if they’re: • involved in a dispute relating to the care of children • thinking of separating or have separated, and are unable to reach an agreement regarding care of their children. If one party wishes to file a Family Court application, the court may require them to complete FDR first. Definition of child for FDR purposes CoCA defines a child as a person under the age of 18 years old. Children 16 years and older can decide who they want...

9. Nathan v Accident Compensation Corporation [2022] NZACC 206 [pdf, 455 KB]

   ...forwarded by Belverdale hospital to Mr Nathan which advise patients to stop smoking and not to smoke on the day of surgery. The nursing assessment noted Mr Nathan had two cigarettes on the morning of his surgery. [70] The experts reviewing the file, including a review of Dr Gardiner’s notes have not suggested any preoperative factors warranted postponement of the surgery or that further investigation should have been undertaken or the factors of smoking and productive cough rec...

10. [2023] NZEnvC 105 Wilson v Waikato Regional Council [pdf, 720 KB]

    ...amended draft Biosecurity Management Plan, including the requirement that only new ropes and ties are to be brought to and used on the spat farm in 4.3 Equipment and Vessels. Costs [13] Any party seeking costs must confer with other parties and file a memorandum proposing a sequential timetable for these matters within 20 working days of the date of this decision. For the court _____________________________ J J M Hassan Environment Judge 4 Wilson v Waikato Regional...