Search Results

1. [2012] NZEmpC 106 Simon Edwards v Two Degrees Mobile Limited [pdf, 51 KB]

   ...July 2012 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS [1] These proceedings were originally intituled ARC 42/12 Simon Maxwell Edwards v Two Degrees Mobile Limited (first defendant) and Eric Bennett Hertz (second defendant) when they were filed on 5 July 2012. An urgent telephone chambers conference was convened at 4pm on that day. Mr Waalkens QC, counsel for the second defendant, Eric Bennett Hertz stated that he was astonished the second defendant was being sued. The sta...

2. [2014] NZEmpC 112 Franix Construction Ltd v Tozer interlocutory [pdf, 57 KB]

   ...would be in the interests of justice to grant the application. The application is accordingly declined. [8] The defendant is entitled to costs. If costs cannot be agreed they may be the subject of an exchange of memoranda, with the defendant filing and serving a memorandum together with any supporting material within five working days of today’s date and the plaintiff having an additional five working days to file any response. Christina Inglis Judge Judgment si...

3. ADF v ZWU Ltd [2013] NZDT 180 (19 June 2013) [pdf, 53 KB]

   ...OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is transferred to the District Court pursuant to s 36(2) of the Disputes Tribunals Act 1988. Facts [1] ADF claims that her former accountant, ZWU Ltd, was negligent in filing a GST return for a tax refund when no GST invoice was held. ADF claims that this caused the IRD to impose a shortfall penalty of $7,333.00, which ADF paid on 15 October 2008. [2] At the hearing today, ZB of ZWU Ltd provided a cer...

4. [2015] NZEmpC 100 IAG NZ Ltd v Boulger [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...person or party until further orders are given by the Court. The second clone copy of the Electronic Devices may be dealt with in accordance with the orders made by this Court on 15 June 2015. b. The applicant and respondent will agree which files on the Electronic Devices contain the respondent’s personal information. This should occur by the respondent indicating (for the applicant’s confirmation) those files it considers contain the respondent’s personal information....

5. UR v OH LCRO 20 / 2013 (2 April 2013) [pdf, 45 KB]

   ...Introduction [1] On [2012] the Auckland Standards Committee (Standards Committee) issued two determinations declining to take any further action on complaints by the Applicant against two lawyers. One was the above Respondent. On [2013] the Applicant filed an application for review of each of those determinations. [2] Counsel for the Respondent contends that the Standards Committee decision was made available to the Applicant via email on [2012] (that is, the same day that the...

6. Dixonlane Apartments [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...Executive’s Decision under s49 of the 2006 Act. This decision therefore looks at whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria specifically in relation to whether the complex was built within the ten-year period before the date the claim was filed Chief Executive Decision The assessor’s report concluded that the claim did not meet the eligibility criteria presumably on the basis that the complex was not built within the 10-year period immediately prior to the claim being...

7. [2018] NZEmpC 11 Andrews t/a Alterations and Designer Garments [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN LEISHA MARAMA ANDREWS TRADING AS ALTERATIONS AND DESIGNER GARMENTS Plaintiff AND ROCHELE REID Defendant Hearing: On the papers filed on 19, 21, 22 and 23 February 2018 Representation: R Alchin, counsel for plaintiff M Revell, advocate for defendant Judgment: 1 March 2018 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS AS TO COSTS ON DISCON...

8. WHT - Guidelines for self represented respondents on documents required for hearing [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...also be clear, concise and easy to follow. 3.2 Any documents referred to in the statements or that may be relied upon or referred to during the hearing should be provided in an indexed and paginated (each page numbered) bundle of documents filed in accordance with the timetable set. If a party is presenting a large number of documents, they should be placed in folders and indexed for easy reference. If there are only a few documents being referred to, they could be attached to th...

9. [2019] NZEnvC 083 Thornley v Sanford Limited [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   ...Environment Judge J J M Hassan Hearing: In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Decision: 6 May 2019 Date of Issue: 6 May 2019 DETERMINATION A: The withdrawal of the application for declaration is noted. B: Subject to any issues as to costs, the file is closed. C: Any application for costs must be lodged and served by Friday 17 May 2019, any reply should be filed by Friday 24 May 2019 and any final reply by Friday 31 May 2019. THORNLEY & ORS v MDC- DETERMINATION Introduc...

10. Wellington International Airport Limited Minute and Directions 2.12.16 [pdf, 823 KB]

    ...COURT CONCERNING SECTION 87G DIRECT REFERRAL (2 DECEMBER 2016) [1] The Court acknowledges receipt of 167 notices of wish to be heard in these proceedings pursuant to s.274 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA), including 6 notices that were filed out of time. A list of parties is attached and a hyperlinked document containing all the section 274 notices will be sent out in due course. [2] The following parties filed their notices with the Court out of time and require waivers pur...