Search Results

1. Review of registrar's decision

   If you want to have reviewed a registrar’s or deputy registrar’s decision (that does not relate to a fee waiver application) you will need to file an interlocutory application within 5 working days of receiving the decision. This application incurs the usual interlocutory application fee Find out more in rule 2.11 of the High Court Rules If you wish to have reviewed a registrar’s or deputy registrar’s decision to decline a fee waiver application you will need to file a written request...

   Located in:

   1. Courts >
   2. Going to court >
   3. Going to court without a lawyer >
   4. Representing yourself in a civil case in the High Court

2. [2017] NZEmpC 39 ALA v ITE [pdf, 317 KB]

   ...Appeal refusing to give leave to appeal. 12 The application for leave to appeal would therefore be treated as applying only to the decision of the Employment Court. The outstanding application before the Supreme Court has been timetabled for the filing of submissions, which the Court will then consider for the purposes of ITE’s leave application. Alleged breaches of compliance orders [18] Against that background, I summarise the three alleged breaches of the compliance orde...

3. KY v VZ LCRO 223 / 2010 (29 September 2011) [pdf, 83 KB]

   ...his complaint against VZ (the Practitioner). [2] The Practitioner represented the Applicant in a criminal matter in the second trial after the first ended with a hung jury. He was found guilty. He later discovered information that led him to file a complaint against the Practitioner. [3] His complaint was that the Practitioner ought not to have represented him for the reason that she was part of the law firm that had represented the Applicant’s wife in a matrimonial matter. T...

4. 24 unit owners of Shed 24 Princess Wharf, 143 Quay Street [2013] NZWHT Auckland 13 [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...Wharf is a nine level apartment complex constructed on the outer north west area of Princess Wharf over ground level offices, cafes and commercial space. The apartments suffer from weathertightness issues and in May 2012 the apartment owners each filed applications for assessor’s reports under s 14 of the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 (the Act). The Weathertight Services Group of the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment has however found that units 1...

5. Mikus - Hoera Te Kooti Whanau Trust (2010) 246 Aotea MB 242 (246 AOT 242) [pdf, 62 KB]

   ...further role in the whānau trust. In response on 16 October 2006 the Registrar sent application forms per section 239 and 240 of the Act to Ms Te Kooti but I am told that these forms were never returned. [6] Then on 30 October 2008 Mr Mikus filed an application for succession under section 118 of the Act in respect of further interests of Hoera Te Kooti. On 4 November 2008 orders were granted vesting the additional interests of the trustees of the whānau trust. [7] Following...

6. [2017] NZEnvC 110 Auckland-Council v L Mao [pdf, 3.2 MB]

   ...Auckland Council v Mao, Mao, Lau & Jesus (2016) Company Limited 2 A: Pursuant to s 279(4) of the Act the Court directs that if the third and fourth Respondents disagree with the prospective action of the Court, then submissions are to be filed within five working days, together with any affidavits in support. B: Auckland Council is to file any submissions and/or affidavits in response within a further five working days. C: The Court will then conclude whether or not it can...

7. LT v NL [2022] NZDT 13 (5 May 2022) [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...take care of it, which he did not by leaving it on the seat of the car. Most likely though any loss of the money was in 2017, the email trail suggests this to be so. Is the claim out of time? 10. NL says the claim is out of time as it was filed more than 6 years after April 2015 when he received the box. He has referred to s11 of the Limitation Act 2010 which says Defence to money claim filed after applicable period (1) It is a defence to a money claim if the defendant...

8. [2023] NZEmpC 67 Bennett v Goldie [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...Authority, Mr Bennett applied for various non-publication orders, some of which were made by the Authority. The Authority, however, declined to make a non-publication order over Mr Bennett’s own health information or his identity. [5] Mr Bennett filed a challenge to the Authority’s determination. He also filed an application for urgency and an application for interim non-publication orders as well as an affidavit in support of those applications. [6] On 21 September 2022,...

9. CD v X Ltd [2024] NZDT 262 (26 March 2024) [pdf, 140 KB]

   ...appealed the breach notice with QF, a division of X Ltd. That appeal was not allowed, and QF indicated that the breach notice stood. 3. CD appealed again, and that appeal was also refused. QF indicated that the breach notice would stand. 4. CD filed a claim with the Disputes Tribunal. 5. QF advised CD on 8 March 2024 that it had waived the breach notice without prejudice. 6. CD is claiming $500.00 which she says is the time she has spent on appealing the original breach...

10. [2024] NZEmpC 85 Pacific Insulation Ltd v Lagera & Anor [pdf, 182 KB]

    ...reimbursement of costs and filing fees. [11] This application for freezing and ancillary orders is supported by a memorandum from counsel, as well as the affidavit from Mr Woollen and an undertaking as to damages. In addition, draft proposed orders were filed. [12] Counsel for Pacific Insulation has certified that: (a) the grounds on which the application relies are made out; and (b) all reasonable inquiries and all reasonable steps have been made or taken to ensure t...