Search Results

1. NZCVS Cycle 5 resources and results

   Cycle 5 (November 2021 - November 2022) About the NZCVS reports   This document provides important information about the NZCVS and how the survey results are reported. We strongly recommend reading this document prior to the NZCVS reports as it enables correct interpretation of the survey results and is key for understanding the reports’ structure and language.  NZCVS Cycle 5 (2021/22) About the NZCVS Reports NZCVS Cycle 5 (2021/22) Key Findings Report  This repor

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy >
   2. Research & data >
   3. New Zealand Crime & Victims Survey (NZCVS)

2. Documents - prescribed forms and templates

   You can submit this file type electronically and pay any associated fee through  File and Pay. On this page: General requirements Prescribed forms and templates This section outlines general requirements for all forms filed in the High Court. General requirements All documents filed in the High Court should include (if known): the name and place of the court where your criminal proceeding will be heard; the CRI and CRN; the names of the prosecutor and yourself, as the person conducting...

   Located in:

   1. Courts >
   2. Going to court >
   3. Going to court without a lawyer >
   4. Representing yourself in a criminal case in the High Court

3. Waitangi Tribunal - approved recommendations for local issues research programme (LIRP) [pdf, 125 KB]

   ...operations on Māori communities since 1991, leading, where merited, to targeted research on selected local examples. 10 1.14 Supplementary listing and indexing of document banks and research information: a) the subject listing of source items, files and file groups for those source collections that lack adequate description of their contents; b) supplementary indexing by person, place, area and land block name, where feasible; and c) a DVD collection of all technical research re...

4. Bahramitash v CAC 402 & Ritesh [2016] NZREADT 40 [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...June 2016 ___________________________________________________________________ DECISION AS TO ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE ___________________________________________________________________ [1] On 3 November 2015 the appellant, Mr Bahramitash, filed an appeal against the finding by the Complaints Assessment Committee 402 (the Committee) in its decision dated 25 August 2015, that the appellant had engaged in unsatisfactory conduct (“the 2 substantive appeal”),1 and i...

5. Yiasoumi v Attorney-General [2017] NZHRRT 12 [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...to Hutt Valley Hospital. At 10.20pm that officer took two photographs of Mr Yiasoumi’s facial injuries. For this he used his Police issue iPhone. In entirely innocent circumstances those photographs were not subsequently attached to the Police file. 1 [This decision is to be cited as: Yiasoumi v Attorney-General [2017] NZHRRT 12.] 2 [2] Because the Police doubted the credibility of Mr Yiasoumi’s account of the inci...

6. WQ v Emberson [2019] NZIACDT 28 (8 May 2019) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...changes made to the immigration policy meant he was not eligible for automatic selection. Ms Emberson admits the delays. [2] A further complaint against Ms Emberson by the regulatory body concerns her failure to make available the complainant’s file for inspection. As to this, she says it was her employer’s file and not hers and she had left the firm’s employment by the time inspection was sought. The issue here for the Tribunal is whether an adviser could be in breach of t...

7. LCRO 84/2020 WF v BP (11 June 2020) [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...The Standards Committee delivered its decision on 23 March 2020. [3] Mr WF lodged his application to review the Committee’s decision on 14 May 2020. [4] The Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (the Act) states that review applications must be filed within 30 working days after a copy or notice of the determination is served on, given to or otherwise brought to the attention of the applicant 2 for review.1 In the absence of proof to the contrary, service of the Committee’s dec...

8. Appellate judgments 2022

   [2022] NZSC 158 Snowdon v Radio New Zealand Limited [2022] NZSC 117 Shaw v Bay of Plenty District Health Board [2022] NZSC 69 TUV v Chief of New Zealand Defence Force [2022] NZSC 15 Head and Ors v Chief Executive of the Inland Revenue Department and Anor APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL - no question of law of general public importance - application declined. [2022] NZSC 9 Snowdon v Radio New Zealand Limited APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - APPLICATION TO ADDUCE NEW EVIDENCE - APPLICATION FOR

   Located in:

   1. Employment Court >
   2. Judgments >
   3. Appellate court judgments

9. Findings of public interest

   This page has links to the coroner’s findings for some cases that are of significant public interest. Elizabeth (Lizzy) Marie MARVIN (CSU-2024-CCH-000298) Lachlan Paul Graham JONES (CSU-2019-DUN-000038) [PDF, 2.3 MB] Niko O’Neill BROOKING-HODGSON (CSU-2016-HAS-000198) Epilepsy Joint Inquiry: Medication brand switch Te Hawiki Hona Kiri TE AMO (CSU-2018-HAM-000443) Christie Alexis Lesley MARCEAU (CSU-2011-AUK-001471) [PDF, 12 MB] Moko Sayviah RANGITOHERIRI (CSU-2015-ROT-000302) [PDF, 2 MB] C

   Located in:

   1. Coroners Court >
   2. Findings & recommendations

10. [2012] NZEmpC 37 Anto v Planet Spice Ltd [pdf, 68 KB]

    ...Registrar reported that he had received an enquiry from counsel for the defendant in relation to an outstanding costs decision in this matter. The Acting Registrar advised that after locating the Court file he had noted that relevant memoranda filed by counsel for the plaintiff and the defendant back in March and April 2011 had never previously been referred to a Judge for attention. The oversight, which appears to be wholly attributable to the Registry Office, is regretted. [2...