18490 items matching your search terms
...application for interlocutory orders in relation to document disclosure BETWEEN SHABEENA SHAREEN NISHA (NISHA ALIM) Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By pleadings and submissions filed on 18 June and 6 and 9 July 2015 Appearances: M W O'Brien and B Nicholson, counsel for plaintiff C Meechan QC, counsel for defendant Judgment: 29 July 2015 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (NO 15) OF CHIEF JUDGE G...
...on 2 September 2008 to determine strike out and removal applications by the first respondent Argon Construction Limited (“Argon”) and the second respondent Auckland City Council (“the Council”). These applications arise from a claim filed by John William Boswell Burns, Peter Geoffrey Stubbs and William Graham George Cameron Cleary as Trustees of the Future Holdings Family Trust (“the Trust”) against Argon and the Council. Bernard Mohan was joined as third respondent o...
...referred this complaint to the Tribunal. The background to the complaint is: [1.1] Mr Dhar’s client sought advice regarding a letter from Immigration New Zealand, the letter expressed concerns relating to a work visa application. [1.2] Mr Dhar filed an expression of interest (EOI), which was selected. However Immigration New Zealand declined the first work visa application; a second work visa application that Mr Dhar prepared. [1.3] Mr Dhar filed a residence application; Immigra...
...Children and young people with charges finalised in any court In 2019, 1,467 children and young people had charges finalised in any court (this includes Youth, District and High Courts). Despite the inclusion of 17- year olds with charges filed from July 2019 onwards, there were 162 (10%) fewer children and young people in total in 2019 than in 2018.4,5 In 2019, 8% of all children and young people with charges finalised in court were 17 years old (114 people; although they...
...application, raised concern that a member of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] which had conducted investigation into the complaints was a lawyer (I will refer to the lawyer as Mr A) well known to both himself and to Mr FT. [35] Subsequent to Mr EQ filing his review application, the [Area] Standards Committee [X], at a meeting convened on 6 August 2019, considered the concerns raised that Mr A had been conflicted and should not have participated in the investigation of the comp...
...Peter Chemis, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 29 July 2013 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A D FORD [1] Shortly after I issued my interlocutory judgment 1 in this case last Friday, 26 July 2013, a fresh application was filed by the plaintiff seeking leave to file an amended statement of claim and an order for further disclosure. A notice of opposition was filed by the defendant this morning. Because of the urgency of the matter (the case is set down for a...
...Judgment: 2 September 2011 FINAL JUDGMENT OF DEPUTY CHIEF JUDGE C L FOX Introduction [1] In a preliminary determination dated 13 June 2011, I issued the following directions: ‘The Registrar complete a full search of the Omuriwaka Block file and identify any plans produced during the first investigation of title hearings that predate 1923. A report under section 40 is to be produced to the Court indicating whether or not such plans exist and whether they were referred t...
...notice to take effect in the meantime. B: The Court also notes that the notice has been issued against an individual in relation to the breach of a condition by a company. C: The Court makes the following directions to hearing: a) Mr Wedd is to file any further affidavits in support of the appeal against Abatement notice by 24 June; b) Auckland Council is to file any reply affidavits by 19 July; c) Mr Wedd is to file any final affidavits in reply by 2 August; d) The matter is to...
...non-publication orders as to the parties’ names, on the basis it was necessary to protect the interests of both the applicant and the first respondent. I accordingly made non-publication orders until further order of the Court. I also directed that the file may not be searched without leave of a Judge. [4] The freezing order was to have effect until 10 August 2021, unless prior to that date the orders were continued or renewed. [5] On 9 August 2021, counsel for the applicant, M...
...amendments, counsel submits that it would be appropriate for those s274 parties opposing the mediated agreement to be able to consider the applicant’s policy planning evidence, including the s32AA report and table of officer recommendations, prior to filing their evidence. Counsel subsequently proposes that the direction at paragraph [16](d)(ii) requiring the applicant to lodge and serve its s32AA report, planning and regulatory evidence and table of officer recommendations by Fr...