Search Results

1. Queensell-Logan v Accident Compensation Corporation (Interlocutory application for orders for proposed witnesses to attend hearing in person) [2024] NZACC 099 (12 June 2024) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...proposed evidence, how an affidavit or written brief of evidence would be obtained (given that the respondent did not intend to provide one) and the proposed line of questioning. [9] The timetable provided for all the necessary documents to be filed by the parties by 12 April 2024. Mr Logan was not able to meet the initial time frame due to unforeseen circumstances. There is no issue about the slippage in the timetable. The registry ultimately received: [a] The appellant’s...

2. Baigent v ACC [2014] NZACA 15 [pdf, 17 KB]

   ...__________________________________________________________________ [1] This is an appeal against the report of a reviewer of 3 April 2013 concerning attendant care compensation. That report had been implemented by the respondent Corporation on 11 April 2013. The appeal to the Authority was filed on about 6 June 2013. [2] This appeal was heard on 31 March 2014 and an Interim Decision issued by the Authority (Ms Bedford) on 15 April 2014. [3] In that decision, the Authority determined...

3. Woodroffe [2012] NZWHT Auckland 21 [pdf, 58 KB]

   ...harbour. The complex was built in 2004/2005. [2] The assessor concluded that the claim was eligible because the unit leaks, and has been damaged as a result of those leaks and because the dwelling was built within ten years of the claim being filed. Section 48 of the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 provides that the chief executive must evaluate every assessor’s report and decide whether the claim to which it relates meets the eligibility criteria. She conc...

4. [2019] NZEmpC 88 Randle v The Warehouse Ltd [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...substantive judgment, The Warehouse Ltd wrote to Mr Bennett, advocate for Ms Randle, in an effort to agree costs. Ms Swarbrick, counsel for The Warehouse Ltd, advises that no response was received from Mr Bennett. Therefore, The Warehouse Ltd filed and served its application. [5] Mr Bennett failed to file any submissions in response to the application within the time allowed. The Court registry then approached him and asked him to advise urgently whether Ms Randle wished to fil...

5. Forms

   ...If you want to update your package, the new installer will automatically uninstall any older versions for you. Download the Word template package Are you having a problem with installing the package? Read the frequently asked questions for help Zipped file of individual form templates You can also download a zipped file of the individual form templates. This will require a manual installation to the location where you keep your shared templates. Download the individual form templates...

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. Lawyers & service providers >
   3. Legal aid lawyers

6. Apostolakis v Rennie (Strike-Out Application) 2017 NZHRRT 42 [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...letter dated 23 October 2015 notified Mrs Apostolakis that it had declined to progress her complaint because she had known of the matters complained about for more than 12 months (HRA, s 80(2)). These present proceedings before the Tribunal were not filed until 11 February 2016. The issue of delay will be returned to later in this decision. [4] In a statement of reply dated 14 March 2016 Ms Rennie has pleaded (inter alia) that the statement of claim discloses no grounds which establish...

7. [2017] NZEmpC 96 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd Interlocutory judgment (No 23) [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...for first defendant N Scampion, counsel for third defendant Judgment: 4 August 2017 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (NO 23) OF JUDGE B A CORKILL Introduction [1] Before the Court are three applications. Two have been filed by the third defendant, Mr Terry Hay. He seeks an order for further and better discovery against the first defendant, LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd (LSG NZ); and he also seeks an order of joining LSG Lufthansa Service Asia Ltd (LSG As...

8. Bamber v Monschau - Tahorakuri A No 1 Sec 33A 2 (2019) 218 Waiariki MB 292 (218 WAR 292) [pdf, 415 KB]

   ...85-86 (55 WAR 85-86). 218 Waiariki MB 294 for costs, totalling $175,851.25.4 Those funds remain outstanding and a transmittal of the orders to the District Court for enforcement has been granted.5 Kathleen and Bruce Bamber have now filed a further appeal to the Māori Appellate Court out of time, which is I understand extant before that Court.6 Earlier applications were also filed seeking the removal of Aaron Bamber as a trustee, along with a review of trust, variation...

9. Director of Proceedings v Smith (Costs) [2020] NZHRRT 35 [pdf, 259 KB]

   ...1996 (Code) in respect of Right 4(1) the defendant consented to a declaration under HDCA, s 54(1)(a) that she had breached this right by failing to provide services to the aggrieved person with reasonable care and skill. In the consent memorandum filed with the Tribunal it was also stated there was no issue as to costs. See Director of Proceedings v N [2019] NZHRRT 38 at [3] and [6]. [18] The parties were, however, in disagreement on the question whether the defendant’s name should b...

10. [2023] NZIACDT 4 – TC v MacLeod (7 February 2023) [pdf, 210 KB]

    ...inclusive or exclusive. It also showed the employment of two people part-time. [5] The family moved to New Zealand in 2013. The complainant commenced trading in about July 2013. First residence application [6] On 14 April 2016, Mr MacLeod filed an entrepreneur residence application for the complainant, including his wife, son and daughter. [7] Immigration NZ sent a letter to the complainant on 27 May 2016 identifying a number of issues and requesting more information. I...