Search Results

1. QN v C Ltd [2022] NZDT 209 (22 May 2022) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...The hearing was convened by teleconference. As a result of the COVID-19 restrictions, the Tribunal was unable to convene a hearing in person. Both parties appeared at the hearing. [2] This matter has had a long history in the Tribunal. The applicant filed a claim against the respondent in the amount of $2,826.42 on 20 September 2019. [3] The applicant claimed paint and panel work carried out by the respondent on his vehicle in early 2014 failed within 4 years and he sought the cost of r...

2. Canterbury District Law Society v Wood [2009] NZLCDT 9 [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...negligence of such a degree as to reflect on his fitness to practise as a barrister and solicitor (s.112(1)(c) of the Law Practitioners Act 1982). 3 [9] The particulars of these charges laid against Mr Wood are set out in the Notice of Charges filed in this matter. [10] In essence, it is alleged that Mr Wood, in breach of Rules 6.01 and 8.01 of the rules of professional conduct, misled an Associate Judge of the High Court, and another practitioner, by giving the Judge and...

3. LCRO 27/2021 BK v RQ (27 August 2021) [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...reporting to the beneficiaries; and (j) request of beneficiaries to sign a deed of interim distribution was not uncommon in circumstances where distribution within six months of probate was being proposed. Application for review [25] Ms BK filed an application for review on 2 March 2021. [26] In significant part, Ms BK’s application reiterates the concerns she had raised in advancing her initial complaint. [27] To the extent that her application traverses new material or ident...

4. [2013] NZEmpC 235 Young v Bay Of Plenty DHB [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of interlocutory applications BETWEEN RODERICK JOHN YOUNG Plaintiff AND BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD Defendant Hearing: 14 November 2013 and by memoranda filed on 20, 21, 22 and 29 November and 6 December 2013 (Heard at Tauranga) Appearances: Plaintiff in person Gail Bingham (on 14 November 2013), EA Smith (on 22 November 2013) , Mark Beech (on 29 November 2013), counsel f...

5. Hauiti v Tamati - Puhunga A7D1 (2017) 68 Tairawhiti MB 100 (68 TRW 100) [pdf, 334 KB]

   ...R Revington, Woodward Chrisp Solicitors, Gisborne DX LP78507, manaaki.t@wwclaw.co.nz mailto:manaaki.t@wwclaw.co.nz 68 Tairawhiti MB 101 Introduction [1] The applicants’ on behalf of the Keita Kapuarangi Tamati whānau trust have filed an application for a permanent injunction per s 19(1)(a) of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 against Emma Tamati (also known as Leah Tamati). [2] Emma Tamati has lived in the house situated on Puhunga A7D1 for approximately 25 years pu...

6. LCRO 68/2021 BU - Application for review of a prosecutorial decision (30 July 2021) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...guilty of unsatisfactory conduct for failing to facilitate the transfer of the shares. The Committee directed that Mr BU was to finalise the transfer of the shares within three months of the date of its determination. [9] On 1 October 2019, Mrs OE filed a further complaint against Mr BU. Her complaint was that Mr BU had failed to comply with the order to transfer shares. [10] In its determination delivered on 14 October 2019, the Standards Committee made a further finding of unsati...

7. EMPC Form 3 - Application for special leave to remove to court [doc, 33 KB]

   ...Employment Court Section 178(3), Employment Relations Act 2000 Proceedings before the Employment Relations Authority I am a party to proceedings before the Employment Relations Authority. Those proceedings are between the above-mentioned parties. The file number of those proceedings is ……………….. The Employment Relations Authority has declined my application for the removal to the Employment Court of the matter to which those proceedings relate (or part of the matter to which t...

8. EMPC Form G31 - Interlocutory application [doc, 34 KB]

   ...judicial decision relied on]. Signature of plaintiff Date: Notice to the respondent to application for leave (1) If you intend to oppose the above application, you must, - (a) within 14 clear days after the date of the service on you of this notice, file with the Registrar of the Employment Court at [place] a written notice stating that you oppose the application; and (b) without delay, serve 1 copy of the written notice on the applicant. (2) If you fail to file a written notice stating...

9. Johnston Property Holdings Limited [2014] NZWHT Auckland 5 [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...Ponsonby Road, Ponsonby, Auckland 1011 ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL [1] Johnston Property Holdings Limited (JPH) is the owner of Unit 2/235 Ponsonby Road, Auckland. On 20 August 2013 JPH filed an application with the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) for a WHRS assessor’s report. The assessor and chief executive concluded that the claim was not an eligible claim because it was not filed within ten...

10. Memorandum of Counsel CVA extension 17 August 2018 [pdf, 362 KB]

    ...Regulatory Authority MEMORANDUM OF COUNSEL Dated 17 August 2018 Director Aidan Warren Aidan.Warren@mccawlewis.co.nz LFJ-447097-3-1169-V2 2 MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT 1. This Memorandum of Counsel is filed on behalf of the section 274 Mana Whenua iwi/hapū opposing an application for resource consent made by Panuku Development Auckland Limited, for the necessary infrastructure and related activities associated with holding the Ameri...