Search Results

1. 2021-05-03 ORC - MOC - evidence in reply and relating timetable matters [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...cross-examination of any expert witnesses recalled to take place in the week of 24 May 2021, 2 noting the indication in the hearing schedule dated 12 April 2021 that the Court is not sitting on Monday 24 May 2021.1 (b) Mr De Pelsemaeker to file evidence-in-reply by Friday 18 June 2021. (c) Any party seeking to cross-examination Mr De Pelsemaeker on his evidence-in-reply to give notice by Wednesday 23 June 2021. (d) Mr De Pelsemaeker to present evidence-in-reply in Court...

2. [2019] NZSSAA 37 (17 June 2019) [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...organisation Auckland Action Against Poverty which, among other services, provides advocacy to beneficiaries bringing appeals to the Authority. 1 Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development v Genet [2016] NZHC 2541. 2 [5] Mr Sowry filed submissions on costs on 8 April 2019 and the Ministry filed submissions in response. Because Mr Sowry sought costs associated with the Benefits Review Committee hearing and did not appear to be aware of the decision of the Hi...

3. [2021] NZEnvC 177 Campbell's Block Limited v Southland Regional Council [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...(‘Wilkins’), a s274 party, opposes the withdrawal of the parts of the appeal relating to rule 20(a)(iii)(1). Counsel provided further submissions by memorandum dated 27 October 2021. [3] By Minute dated 2 November 2021, Wilkins was directed to file a notice of motion and accompanying affidavit. Any party who opposes the notice of motion was to file a memorandum in response. Wilkins grounds of opposition [4] On 5 November 2021, Wilkins filed a notice of motion and affidavi...

4. Palmer v Harrison - Harataunga West 2B2B2B2 (2021) 227 Waikato Maniapoto MB 276 (227 WMN 276) [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...determined is whether the Court should grant an injunction against the trustees to prevent them from granting further licences to occupy over the block. He aha ngā ture e hāngai ana ki te tono nei? What legal principles apply? [3] Ms Palmer filed her application on 29 March 2021. It was heard in Thames on 24 May 2021. At the hearing, she confirmed that she sought an injunction per s 19(1)(b) of the Act. She acknowledged that an injunction under s 19(1)(a) is not available, a...

5. FC v N Ltd [2022] NZDT 255 (20 December 2022) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...of the Disputes Tribunal hearing there is no jurisdiction for the District Court to reach a finding different to that of the Referee. A Notice of Appeal may be obtained from the Ministry of Justice, Disputes Tribunal website. The Notice must be filed at the District Court of which the Tribunal that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have...

6. DN & KN v NQ [2023] NZDT 761 (12 December 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...[2023] NZDT 761 APPLICANT DN and KN RESPONDENT NQ The Tribunal orders: NQ is to pay DN and KN $30,000.00 by 30/12/23. Reasons: 1. This order should be read with that dated 13/9/23. 2. The applicant elected to file submissions and evidence in support of those in accordance with the directions in my last order. 3. The respondent elected not to do so. 4. The Respondent was a licensed real estate agent prior to entering into the sale and purchase ag...

7. IACDT annual report 2023 [pdf, 272 KB]

   ...for the Tribunal for the 2022/2023 financial year. There has been a significant decrease in the number of outstanding matters before the Tribunal from 16 (at 1 July 2022) to 4 (at 30 June 2023). This reflects a drop in the number of cases filed. JURISDICTION AND GENERAL INFORMATION Establishment and Function of the Tribunal The Tribunal is based in Wellington. It was established in 2007 by s 40 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 (the Act). The purpose...

8. Holdaway v Accident Compensation Corporation (Costs on appeal) [2023] NZACC 71 [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...fresh review and appeal rights relating to the new decision of ACC, the appropriate course is that the present appeal, now being redundant, is struck out. [7] The appellant, at that time, advised the Court she would be seeking costs and duly filed a memorandum dated 12 April 2023 seeking costs of $99,000. Her rationale for this was that she had spent total hours of “around 120”, to which she applied her going rate of $550 per hour and she said: Given the conduct of the Corp...

9. NQ v QC [2023] NZDT 328 (19 July 2023) [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...the $1,900.00 paid to QC Ltd. He also claims the Tribunal application fee. 5. QC Ltd claims that the amount paid by ED does not cover fees for all of the time spent on the matter and it is entitled to retain the $1,900.00 paid by NQ. They also filed a counterclaim for $1,456.67 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 being the amount due on the 11 August invoice plus interest on that amount at a rate of 1% per month. Is QC Ltd entitled to retain the sum paid by NQ and is the firm...

10. Re Bruniges (Jurisdiction) [2024] NZHRRT 26 [pdf, 111 KB]

    ...first three defendants. There was no Certificate of Investigation in respect of MFAT. On 2 October 2023 the Commissioner confirmed to the Tribunal that he had not investigated the complaint against MFAT. [3] The Tribunal accepted the claim for filing against the first three defendants but explained to Mr Bruniges that there was no apparent jurisdiction in respect of MFAT. Mr Bruniges was invited to provide submissions or further information if he considered otherwise. 1This...