OQ v QM & ors [2024] NZDT 539 (22 July 2024) [pdf, 166 KB]
...to the construction work; and e) the arborist in a report prepared for the second respondent did not consider there was a significant degree of physical root disturbance “inflicted on the tree.” 8. There was considerable documentation filed including [City] Council guidelines “Working in and around Trees,” “Building on small sites – doing it Right,” email exchanges, photos and each party filed arborist reports from suitably qualified arborists. 9. In addition, th...