Search Results

1. Waitangi Tribunal Wai 2540 2.5.4 Department of Corrections and Reoffending Prisoners Claim [pdf, 605 KB]

   ...Maniapoto, Rongomaiwahine and Ngati Kahungunu ON APPLICATION FOR AN URGENT HEARING 11 November 2015 camerja Official camerja Received camerja Text Box 11 Nov 2015 Introduction 1. This decision concerns an application for an urgent hearing filed by Tom Hemopo on behalf of himself, Ngati Maniapoto, Rongomaiwahine and Ngati Kahungunu concerning the Crown's failure to reduce the number of Maori who reoffend thus reducing the disproportionate number of Maori serving sentences....

2. HJ v IK LCRO 127/2015 (19 February 2016) [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...summarised the complaint in the following way:1 a. By her letter of 27 August 2013 Ms IK made allegations against Mr HJ that were defamatory and/or an attack on his reputation without cause, and which were published to independent parties. b. Ms IK filed documents in court alleging fraud, dishonesty and other reprehensible conduct by Mr HJ and/or [Company A] in circumstances that breached rules 13.8.1 and 13.8.2 of [the Conduct and Client Care Rules].2 c. That, in naming Mr HJ and...

3. 2021-04-28 Minute - PC7 - Deemed Permits - Amicus - Expert Conferencing.pdf [pdf, 260 KB]

   ...memorandum by Friday 30 April 2021, giving reasons. Counsel’s submissions on rights of priority [6] Counsel representing the Otago Water Resource Users Group, the Director-General of Conservation and the Minister for the Environment have each filed submissions in relation to rights of priority. However, counsel have yet to address the statutory context under which the rights arise and, it follows, the scope for PC7 to either recognise or to respond to the same. [7] The cou...

4. Wellington Standards Committee 2 v Austin [2016] NZLCDT 33 [pdf, 62 KB]

   ...Statutory Declarations for Transmission by Survivorship. 13. On 13 February 2015, Treadwell Gordon was notified by Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) that the firm would undergo a follow-up review of its e-dealing systems and controls. 14. One of the files to be reviewed was the e-dealing. 15. When Ms Y prepared the requisite file for the LINZ review on 24 February 2015, the Declarations were not present on the file. 16. On 24 February 2015, Ms Y advised the Practitioner that she co...

5. [2017] NZEmpC 48 Prasad and Tulai v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...against the first and second third parties joined to the proceedings, are to be the subject of a hearing before a full Court in view of important issues arising from the proceedings. [3] The defendant, LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd (LSG), has filed an interlocutory application to the court, requiring the plaintiffs to provide further and better particulars of their claim. This Court has jurisdiction to consider such an application and make such orders as are held to be appropriat...

6. [2019] NZEnvC 148 Guthrie v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...reserved but are not encouraged. REASONS Introduction [1] Queenstown Lakes District Council ('QLDC') is undertaking a staged review of its operative District Plan ('ODP' and 'ODP Review'). Several appeals have been filed against decisions in Stages 1 and 2 of the ODP Review. This decision determines some applications under s281 of the Resource Management Act 1991 ('RMA'), for waiver for the late filing of s274 notices to join two appeals on...

7. Insley v Insley - Awanui Haparapara No 4B (2019) 211 Waiāriki MB 68 (211 WAR 68) [pdf, 371 KB]

   ...withdrawn those resignations in June 2018. Ms Wara (as she then was) contended that, in accordance with this Court’s decision in Ngamoki-Cameron v Koopu – The Proprietors of Mangaroa and Other Blocks Incorporated withdrawal of a resignation once filed can only be effective if the governance body itself accepts such a change.1 Mr Hemi in rejoinder responded that Ms Wara’s clients were put on notice that the respondents had withdrawn their resignations and, in any case, no forma...

8. LCRO Annual Report 2018 [pdf, 270 KB]

   ...applications were made have been completed • the timeliness with which reviews have been completed • the outcomes of the reviews • the number of applications for review still outstanding. The number and types of applications for review filed The LCRO received 239 applications for review during the reporting period of 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2018. This is a slight decrease compared to the previous reporting year, in which 252 applications were received. The 239 a...

9. [2019] NZEmpC 118 Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd [pdf, 421 KB]

   ...and submissions regarding the costs-related matters by 12 August 2019. b) That Infinity then file and serve submissions in reply by 26 August 2019. [14] I said I would resolve the application on the papers. [15] On 9 August 2019, Mr Lorigan filed a document entitled “CHALLENGES TO DETERMINATIONS, ORDERS AND LEGAL VALIDITY OF ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS, PLUS A UNILATERIAL WAIVER OF PRIVILEGE”. [16] The document stated that, having regard to Mr Lorigan’s views about alleged ille...

10. LCRO 9/2020 SC v KB and ZR (30 April 2020) [pdf, 110 KB]

    ...evidence. Ms SC had failed to meet that standard. (d) There was nothing in the complaints raised by Ms SC capable of sustaining allegations that either Ms KB or Mr ZR acted in breach of their professional duty. Application for review [12] Ms SC filed an application for review on 14 January 2020. 4 [13] She submits that: (a) Her first complaint (2015) had not been given proper consideration by the Committee charged with the responsibility for conducting an inquiry into the...