Search Results

Search results for Filing.

18507 items matching your search terms

  1. LCRO 116/2015 QO v Standards Committee (14 June 2018) [pdf, 208 KB]

    ...between 2010 and late 2012. Disclosure in Mrs MN’s case took place by instalments which meant that Ms QO’s staff had to copy and send disclosure documents to Mrs MN more than once during the retainer. Over the course of the retainer, the file grew to contain around 20,000 pages contained in 22 Eastlight folders. [13] In July 2012, Mrs MN identified a single page of information that related to another of Ms QO’s clients in a bundle of disclosure she had received from Ms QO’...

  2. MacGregor v Craig (Rescission of Confidentiality Orders) [2016] NZHRRT 23 [pdf, 225 KB]

    1 (1) NOTE ALL NON-PUBLICATION ORDERS MADE BY THE TRIBUNAL HAVE BEEN RESCINDED AND NO LONGER APPLY (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2016] NZHRRT 23 Reference No. HRRT 040/2015 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN RACHEL MACGREGOR PLAINTIFF AND COLIN CRAIG DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairpers...

  3. Tamplin v Boizard [2021] NZHRRT 42 [pdf, 242 KB]

    ...an information privacy principle. [5] After the hearing, on 1 December 2020 the PA 1993 was repealed and replaced by the Privacy Act 2020 and the HIPC was repealed and replaced by the Health Information Privacy Code 2020. However, this claim was filed under the PA 1993 and heard under that Act. The transitional provisions in Privacy Act 2020, Schedule 1, Part 1, cl 9(1) provide that these proceedings must be continued and completed under the 2020 Act, but that does not alter the releva...

  4. OIA-100246.pdf [pdf, 1.4 MB]

    ...disclosure - that is usually the hold up. 4.4.2 CMMs and CRHs are Not Working as Anticipated in the CPA The Criminal Procedure Act 2011 builds in the use of Case Management Memoranda and Case Reviews. The Case Management Memorandum (CMM) is jointly filed by the defendant and the prosecutor and is supposed to tell the court all the details that relate to the case and what the issues will be at the trial. The Case Review Hearing (CRH) occurs before the case goes to trial to see if a re...

  5. [2012] NZEmpC 24 Butterworth v TBA Communications Ltd [pdf, 148 KB]

    ...is some urgency attaching to these proceedings as the plaintiff is required, in terms of the compliance order made by the Authority, to make payment of the outstanding amount by 14 March 2012 (no application for stay of those orders having been filed). Background [2] The original costs determination of the Authority followed a personal grievance brought by the plaintiff against the defendant, together with an application for interim reinstatement. No issue has been taken with t...

  6. L v Kim [2015] NZIACDT 73 (04 June 2015) [pdf, 147 KB]

    ...charge of the instructions, and provide advice and services professionally; and breached clause 2.1(b) by having an unlicensed person provide immigration advice and services unlawfully. [5] The grounds of complaint were wider; the complainant has not filed a statement of reply seeking to pursue the wider grounds of complaint. Accordingly, the Tribunal will only consider the grounds the Registrar considered to have potential support. The responses [6] The complainant filed a statement...

  7. Tamati – Whareongaonga 6 Block (2012) 27 Tairāwhiti MB 194 (27 TRW 194) [pdf, 124 KB]

    ...and trespass caused by Whareongaonga 5 denying unrestricted access, and costs. 2 [2] These applications stem from a lengthy and complicated background which will be outlined below. [3] On 12 December 1996, John Tamati (the present applicant) filed an application in terms of s 45 of the Act claiming that his mother’s interests in Whareongaonga C12/5D2A had not been correctly recorded in the Manutuke Consolidation Scheme. [4] This application lead to an inquiry before me in Gis...

  8. Jamieson Fear v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 411), James & Nicola Sutton [2017] NZREADT 68 [pdf, 187 KB]

    ...Authority”) by 4 September 2016. The orders made in the first penalty decision (for censure, and for Mr Fear to undergo specified training), were not amended and remain on foot. [5] On 1 September 2017, the Tribunal received a notice of appeal filed by Mr Fear, against the second penalty decision. The grounds of appeal set out in his notice of 1 Re Jamieson Fear, Complaint No C11489, Decision finding unsatisfactory conduct, 10 May...

  9. Taueki - Horowhenua 11 (Lake) (2016) 363 Aotea MB 114 (363 AOT 114) [pdf, 158 KB]

    ...“Nursery” situated adjacent to Lake Horowhenua. She also seeks an interim injunction to enable those presently in occupation of the Nursery to continue their occupation undisturbed, pending determination of the substantive matters. She has also filed an application for damages. [2] For over 10 years the Nursery buildings have been occupied by Ms Taueki’s brother Mr Phillip Taueki. Mr Taueki’s occupation has been the subject of previous litigation. On 4 November 2015 I made t...

  10. E v T [2021] NZDT 1310 (28 January 2021) [pdf, 226 KB]

    ...foreseeable and reasonable step is to file a claim in the Disputes Tribunal when negotiations fail. It is not economic to incur legal fees greater than the dispute, or even to a significant proportion of the dispute. The Disputes Tribunal results in a filing fee, but no more legal fees, and a District Court order to resolve the matter. Therefore, it is not a necessary or reasonable consequence of the failure of the System that Ms E incurred such high legal fees. I have awarded $1...