Search Results

Search results for Filing.

18507 items matching your search terms

  1. Pope v Human Rights Commission (Strike-Out Application) [2014] NZHRRT 3 [pdf, 88 KB]

    ...requisite material …; but the fact that applications to strike out raise difficult questions of law, and require extensive argument does not exclude jurisdiction … Background [5] On 3 June 2013 a statement of claim in the name of Mr Pope was filed by Mr Mike Ward of Mt Maunganui. Also filed on that date was an Authority to Act apparently signed by Mr Pope on 4 March 2013 appointing Mr Ward “agent/representative” in these proceedings for the period 15 February 2013 to 15 Februa...

  2. SE v VT, DJ and CM LCRO 163/2014 (11 March 2015) [pdf, 101 KB]

    ...the BW group, made demand on the accountant to refrain from releasing the MYOB program until the dispute had been resolved. [8] This stand-off was not resolved until late 2006 when the program was provided to Mr SE. [9] In mid 2013 Mr SE filed complaints against the three lawyers with the New Zealand Law Society Lawyers Complaints Service (NZLS). These were summarised as follows by the Standards Committee: • Mr VT and Mr CM were alleged to have “refused to release files...

  3. BN & MN v Hakaoro [2013] NZIACDT 51 (15 August 2013) [pdf, 156 KB]

    ...Hakaoro failed wholly to provide the professional services he charged for; he was dishonest and misleading, and failed to meet minimum professional standards. [9] The complaint has been upheld. THE STATEMENT OF COMPLAINT [10] The complaint has been filed by the Registrar, in the form of a Statement of Complaint. Material facts [11] The Registrar identified the material facts that founded the complaint in his Statement of Complaint. [12] The Statement of Complaint refers to a lett...

  4. Smith v Accident Compensation Corporation (Personal Injury) [2023] NZACC 98 [pdf, 194 KB]

    ...27 March 1990 to 4 October 1991. [19] On 9 September 2005, the Corporation issued a decision declining Mr Smith’s application for weekly compensation. A review was lodged and the Corporation’s decision was upheld at review. An appeal was filed with the District Court. 4 [20] On 13 June 2006, Judge Cadenhead issued a judgment allowing the appeal.1 The Court determined that Mr Smith was entitled to weekly compensation from 12 April 1990 to 4 October 1991. [21] On 7 Augu...

  5. Jones v Accident Compensation Corporation (Backdated Weekly Compensation) [2023] NZACC 117 [pdf, 205 KB]

    ...2017, Dr Hefford wrote to the Corporation providing medical information regarding Mr Jones’ treatment for his sinusitis, but advising that only limited assistance could be provided, given the scope of the claim. [16] On 13 December 2017, Mr Jones filed a review application against the November 2017 decision. For an extended period during the review process, the parties liaised in order to try to obtain further information to support the claim. [17] On 10 December 2018, Mr Jones...

  6. Roberts - Te Touwai B19A1 (2015) 114 Taitokerau MB 131 (114 TTK 131) [pdf, 702 KB]

    ...access was never formalised. The applicant now seeks an order per s 326B of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act (“the Act”) to formalise the existing access. [6] Mr Hockley appeared as counsel for the applicant. Letters in support of the application were filed from five owners in B16. Clem Simich is a son of Mere Urlich, a deceased owner in B16, and appeared in person in opposition to the application. Mr Simich also filed letters of opposition from five other owners in B16....

  7. Cotter v Cotter - Tutaekuri B13 [2019] Chief Judge's MB 951 (2019 CJ 951) [pdf, 471 KB]

    ...of intention to appear was on behalf of Counsel Bidois for the respondents (transferees), filed a memorandum seeking a timetable for applicant’s evidence. The memorandum is summarised below: i. Counsel requested timetabling directions for filing of the applicant’s evidence; and ii. The applicant has not produced evidence to prove that the order is erroneous Submissions: i. Counsel claims that the applicant has no success without evidence to prove there was an error in...

  8. Naera v Fenwick - Whakapoungakau 24 (2019) 217 Waiariki MB 85 (217 WAR 85) [pdf, 536 KB]

    ...trustee, to provide the relevant project documents to Dr Kyriak.10 The trust had complied with similar orders issued in 2009. [5] In the 20 December 2016 judgment, the trustees of Paehinahina Mourea Trust and Manupirua Trust had also been directed to file a report and to attend Court and answer questions on those reports, on the following terms:11 [18] I therefore direct the trustees of Paehinahina Mourea and Manupirua Trusts to provide me with a written report on their activiti...

  9. Regulatory Impact Statement Improving Case Management for Civil Cases in the High Court [pdf, 5.3 MB]

    ...from witnesses, to long complex cases involving many parties. Some straightforward cases, such as company liquidations or insolvency, are generally not subject to case management. Case management covers the time between when the case is first filed and when it is heard by a judge. About 17()O'general proceeding~ are filed inthe High Qourt in a Eiai-:' ...... ,:. 3. Approximately 90 percent of general civil proceedings filed in the High Court are resolved before the...