Search Results

1. Kemp - Pouto Topu A (2012) 51 Taitokerau MB 277 (51 TTK 277) [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...problem of the baches. Of course, the trustees do not need a resolution of the beneficial owners to deal with people occupying the land without Trust’s permission. That is the Trust’s right and, indeed, its duty. [10] The Trust’s position upon filing the applications is that all the baches should now be removed, whether put there by beneficial owners or non-owners. Nevertheless, the trustees say that they have reluctantly brought the applications in response to the Court’s di...

2. Hartlepool v Basildon LCRO 79 / 2009 (3 September 2009) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...Basildon writes to Ms Hartlepool outlining the basis upon which an appeal would be conducted and raising the issue of allegations made. 15 October Fax from Ms Hartlepool’s daughter to Mr Basildon complaining about delays. 17 October Memorandum filed in court (in other proceedings) by Mr Basildon stating “counsel is in the process of taking instructions from Mrs Hartlepool in relation to making an appeal…” 24 October Ms Hartlepool faxes Mr Basildon instructing him to fi...

3. AL v BW LCRO 268 / 2012 (24 July 2013) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...occasion when he was involved in a number of long hearings and also away from Auckland because of other professional roles. He noted that at the particular time there was a delay of three to four weeks before he could give his full attention to the file, but otherwise there was usually a 24 to 48 hour turnaround in response to many of the emails received. The Practitioner noted that his client took a position in negotiations which was not accepted by the Applicant and that his role...

4. OX v PE LCRO 224 / 2010 and 262 / 2011 (22 August 2012) [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...following allegations: that the Practitioner was involved in soliciting false testimony against the Applicant; that the Practitioner was involved in the fabrication of a statement made by BJ (a witness); that the Practitioner intentionally filed affidavits that contained false testimony; 3 that the Practitioner intentionally lied to the Court on 7 August 2009 when he informed the Court that six supervised visits had been ordered, knowing that there had only been fo...

5. Crosby v Appleton - Whangamata 4D1C1B (2008) 114 Hauraki MB 209 (114 H 209) [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   ...2007. (Reference 113 Hauraki MB 114-120). [2] On that day the respondent was granted an occupation order in respect of some 642m2, being an area known as "section 5" on a plan provided to the COUli by RMS Surveyors. [3] The applicant filed an application for a rehearing with the Court on 21 December 2007. PAULA CROSBY v LAVINIA APPLETON MLC A20080001082 [10 July 20081 [4] The land in question is administered as an AIm Whenua Trust. It comprises some 4.8582 hectares (...

6. Nee Harland v Prentice - Mana Ahuriri Incorporated Society (2017) 59 Takitimu MB 227 (59 TKT 227) [pdf, 348 KB]

   ...post-settlement governance entity for Ahuriri Hapū, and by a majority of 71 per cent, approved MAT receiving the redress. As is customary, the settlement will be implemented by legislation. Procedural history [10] The application for rehearing was filed on 16 March 2017. I then issued a direction to advise the respondent parties that they had three weeks to file submissions in reply. Counsel for MAI and the Komiti members responded on 12 April 2017. Counsel for the Crown al...

7. Cooper v Corrections [2019] NZHRRT 23 [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...Court and was remanded until 14 March 2014, so that he could provide possible addresses for the Probation Service to assess for an electronically monitored sentence (home or community detention). [7] On 24 February 2014, the Public Defence Service filed an application on behalf of Mr Cooper for substitution of a community-based sentence in lieu of a disqualification under s 94 of the Land Transport Act 1998 (LTA) in the District Court at Papakura. This application placed reliance on M...

8. LCRO 77/2020 MP v RJ (30 July 2020) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...been misleading and deceptive in relation to his client company’s disclosure obligations; and (b) Mr RJ had failed to provide documents requested, and (c) Mr RJ had made statements that were misleading in a judicial conference. [30] When filing his second complaint, it is readily apparent that Mr MP was aware that he was at risk of his second complaint being dismissed on grounds that Mr MP was attempting to relitigate a complaint that had already been addressed by a Standards...

9. 2020 NZEnvC 142 Environmental Defence Society Incorporated v New Zealand Aluminium Smelters Limited [pdf, 16 MB]

   ...application for waiver of time by Southland Storage Limited is granted and Southland Storage Limited is joined as a s 27 4 party to the proceedings. REASONS 2 The application for waiver [1] Southland Storage Limited ("SSL") has now filed as 274 notice dated 28 August 2020 and accompanying application for waiver of time to file dated 24 August 2020. [2] SSL owns the premises where ouvea premix is currently stored in Mataura. It supports the relief sought by Environm...

10. [2021] NZEmpC 88 Panapa v Spotless Facility Services (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 222 KB]

    ...ultimately she and Spotless attended mediation on 24 January 2019. Three weeks after mediation had taken place, but not resolved matters, Mr Mapu, who is Ms Panapa’s representative, wrote to Spotless advising that a statement of problem had been filed with the Authority on behalf of Ms Panapa. He also sought Ms Panapa’s return to work. Spotless did not respond to that letter at the time, only responding by email on 15 May 2019, saying that it had carefully investigated Ms Pan...