Search Results

1. Wellington v Wellington - Tuateanui 2B1A Māori Reservation (2020) 209 Taitokerau MB 59 (209 TTK 59) [pdf, 254 KB]

   ...Hei timatanga kōrero - Introduction [1] This decision concerns two competing applications seeking the replacement and appointment of trustees to Tuateanui 2B1A Māori Reservation Trust (“the reservation trust”). The first application was filed by was filed by Rachel Wellington (“the first applicant”), as a beneficiary of the reservation trust. The second application was filed by Rose Wellington (“the second applicant”), as a trustee of the reservation trust. [2] The...

2. [2018] NZSSAA 12 (28 February 2018) [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...duty to investigate. Submissions of the Chief Executive [13] The Ministry submits that asking a beneficiary to apply for a benefit at their local office is not a final decision under the Act that is amenable to review by the BRC. In submissions filed on 8 December 2017 Mr Stainthorpe, counsel for the Chief Executive, states that the Ministry relies on a letter to the Authority from the Appeals Officer dated 12 October 2017 to support its submissions. [14] The Appeals Officer co...

3. IT & NH v UN Ltd [2022] NZDT 163 (25 October 2022) [pdf, 257 KB]

   ...paid $1,240.00 (50%) as a deposit. When the model was available, Mr O of the Responder sent photos of the model to the Applicants. The Applicants were not happy with the results and refused to pay the remainder. They asked for a refund. They then filed a claim for a refund in the Disputes Tribunal. The Respondent filed a counterclaim for the amount outstanding. 2. This is a claim for a refund and a counterclaim for the remaining balance to be paid, both in the sum of $1,240.00....

4. DT v TX [2023] NZDT 291 (1 August 2023) [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...of the Disputes Tribunal hearing there is no jurisdiction for the District Court to reach a finding different to that of the Referee. A Notice of Appeal may be obtained from the Ministry of Justice, Disputes Tribunal website. The Notice must be filed at the District Court of which the Tribunal that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you ha...

5. CH v SU [2024] NZDT 868 (5 December 2024) [pdf, 156 KB]

   ...harassment. The Insurance company facilitated the repairs to the [vehicle 1] after completing a comprehensive motor vehicle assessment report and having the repairs performed by a reputable panel shop. The total cost of repairs was $2,532.50. X Ltd filed the claim in the Tribunal seeking $2,510.00. The issues: 8) The issues are broadly twofold, namely: a) Whether the evidence proves that SU caused damage to CH’s [vehicle 1]. b) Are the repair costs of $2,510.00 are fair and re...

6. Te Rau o te Tika: Justice System Kaupapa Inquiry (Wai 3060)

   ...Back to top Ng ā Rauemi | Resources More information about the Waitangi Tribunal’s kaupapa inquiry programme is available on the Waitangi Tribunal’s website. Official copies of documents issued by the Waitangi Tribunal, or documents filed by the Crown and interested parties, are available via the Waitangi Tribunal’s website search function – filter by inquiry, then select Te Rau o te Tika. Here is information about progress of the Inquiry: Events | Waitangi Tribunal. So...

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy

7. [2012] NZEmpC 131 Matamata Industrial Machinery Imports Ltd v McAllister [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...defendant is using in his competing business; and b) the defendant may destroy or cause to be unavailable evidence for use in proposed proceedings before the Employment Relations Authority, as set out in a draft statement of problem which was filed with the application. c) the defendant may misuse the plaintiff’s confidential information. [3] It was clear from the affidavit evidence filed in support of the application and counsel’s submissions that there was a very substant...

8. [2012] NZEmpC 188 ABC01 Ltd (formerly Primary Heart Care Ltd) v Dell [pdf, 91 KB]

   ABC01 LIMITED (FORMERLY PRIMARY HEART CARE LIMITED) V HOWARD DELL NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 188 [6 November 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 188 ARC 62/12 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file challenge out of time BETWEEN ABC01 LIMITED (FORMERLY PRIMARY HEART CARE LIMITED) Plaintiff AND HOWARD DELL Defendant ARC 65/12 IN THE MATTER OF an application for compliance order BETWEEN HOWARD DELL Plaint...

9. Bailey v The Māori Trustee - Te Riri A Te Hore 2 (2014) 322 Aotea MB 67 [pdf, 156 KB]

   ...Frances Cornelia Slight (the Slights), as respondents in the current application. The issue for determination is simply whether or not the application for joinder should be granted. Background [2] Moari Maraea Bailey and Julian Taitoko Bailey filed two applications in relation to Te Riri A Te Hore 2 Block on 15 December 2012. The first for replacement of trustees per s 239 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993. The second for a review of trust and recovery of costs for damages to l...

10. [2013] NZEmpC 96 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [pdf, 96 KB]

    ...ARC 19/11 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN JOHN MATSUOKA Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By submissions filed on 8, 13, 20 February and 1 March 2013 Appearances: Rob Towner, counsel for plaintiff Garry Pollak, counsel for defendant Judgment: 29 May 2013 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS Introduction [1] Ther...