18519 items matching your search terms
...FIONA REIHANA RUKA Applicant Judgment: 6 September 2012 DECISION OF CHIEF JUDGE WW ISAAC 2012 Chief Judge’s MB 417 [1] This application filed by Fiona Reihana Ruka (“the Applicant”), pursuant to s 45 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993, seeks to amend a partition order dated 7 January 1976 at 9 Kaikohe MB 152 concerning Taheke 23A and Taheke 23B. [2] The Applicant seeks...
...The applicant disputed the boundaries of Omuriwaka and Tahora 2AD Section 2; and he complained The Whakatane District Council is widening their boundary for a roadway without proper consultation with the people of the land. [9] The affidavit filed by Mr Te Pairi in support of the application alleged that: 1. The boundaries of the Maori Reservation land to be used for access for the road formation are in dispute. The surveys that the Council have previously upheld as accurate be...
...shareholder nor a director of that company. [6] In his 15 September 2009 letter to the Standards Committee the Practitioner explained that an enquiry into Seven‟s solvency status was made when it had appeared to the fee earner on that file that Seven ‘had reached an arrangement directly with the vendor of the ... lodge to be employed in the business and we were merely checking the position in relation to the [X Ltd] transaction to verify [Seven‟s] contention that he was a...
...psychologist, of 23 May 1989 advising that Mr Homes could work 20 hours per week. [8] Mr Homes then made his first appeal to the Authority within time, on 10 March 1997, challenging the decision of 7 February 1997 (Authority file no. ACA 15/97). He filed the appeal in person. [9] On 15 June 1998, a solicitor acting for Mr Homes, Mr Cadenhead, wrote to the Authority advising that he had “received instructions from Mr Homes that he wished to have this appeal withdrawn”. He enquired...
...to ‘dump’ her because she [Ms GV] was a better lawyer.” [3] On 16 November 2015, the Committee resolved: a) to inquire into the complaint pursuant to section 137 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006; and b) to call for copies of all files relating to the work Ms GV had undertaken for the [ABC Trust] from 2014 to the date of the resolution, including any matter that related to the [Inquiry A]. These were to be provided pursuant to section 147 of the Act. 2 [4] On 2...
...trustees should have considered. [3] The trustees provided evidence to the Court of the relevant consents and permits and other documentation demonstrating that they had followed the necessary procedures required to demolish Te Amiki. They also filed evidence of support for the demolition from the beneficiaries. [4] Having considered the evidence, on 8 July 2016 I declined to grant the injunction and confirmed that written reasons would follow in due course. 51 Tākitimu 71...
...adverse consequences • interference with privacy No opinion, complaint withdrawn – section 71(1)(d). Principle 6 and Principle 7 – No final view formed. N/A No final view formed. Mr Gray’s claim [7] In these proceedings filed with the Tribunal on 30 November 2017 Mr Gray alleges the Ministry for Children breached information privacy principles 6 and 7. Mr Gray also alleges that his right to the observance of the principles of natural justice was breached by...
...Gazette 1787 at 1795 4 72 Taranaki MB 232-233 (72 TAR 232-233) 431 Aotea MB 121 same period along with financial statements and any other documents that might assist the review. [8] On 17 March 2020, Elsie Kearns on behalf of the trustees filed trustee meeting minutes from 13 March 2020, 29 June 2019, 19 January 2016, 24 June 2012 and 6 October 2007. She also filed financial reports from 5 July 2007 to 31 March 2019 along with a memorandum of lease dated 2 September 2019,...
...sought is for the Authority’s costs determination, because it is the only one of them that can have an immediate effect on him before his challenge is decided. Only one ground was stated to support Mr Wei’s application, namely that he had filed a challenge. Subsequently, he filed an affidavit providing explanations for the challenge, and which may have been intended to supply the grounds of this application. Combining the two produces the following summary: (a) A challenge...
...1999 at an annual rental of $800.00. This lease expired on 31 December 2003. 3. Kaiwaitau 1 is administered under an Ahu Whenua Trust. There are 482 beneficial owners of the land, and the total shareholding is 300.000 shares. 4. Mr Tori Reid first filed an application for partition of this land in 1992, that application was dismissed at 90 WR 16-32 and so was a subsequent application filed in 1993. On 28 May 2003 Mr Reid filed another application for partition with the Maori Land Court...