Search Results

1. [2025] NZEmpC 252 Wilson v Chief Executive of Inland Revenue Department [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...papers Appearances: G Paine, counsel for plaintiff S Hornsby-Geluk, counsel for defendant Judgment: 28 November 2025 CONSENT INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE HELEN DOYLE (Applications for stay) [1] Mr Wilson has filed three sets of proceedings in this Court. EMPC 309/2025 [2] The first de novo challenge is in relation to EMPC 309/2025 to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) dated 19 June 2025.1 It rela...

2. Tully v Yerman [2012] NZIACDT 19 (9 May 2012) [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...visas so the family could migrate to New Zealand. [2] The application was not successful, and there was a right of appeal to the Residence Review Board. An appeal was lodged. However the Board gave notice the appeal could not proceed, as it was filed out of time. [3] It appeared Ms Yerman thought the appeal had been lodged in time, but has had to accept it was filed late. However, she says it is her clients, not her, that are responsible for failing to lodge the appeal on time. She...

3. [2025] NZIACDT 31 – LY x Jiang (16 June 2025) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...the complainant. The adviser’s fee was RMB 7,000 (about NZD 1,600). Mr Jiang prepared a services agreement (signed by him on 13 April 2023). It was sent to the agent, but it was never signed by the complainant. [9] The visa application was filed by Mr Jiang with Immigration New Zealand (Immigration NZ) on 13 April 2023. [10] On 19 April 2023, Immigration NZ approved a work visa for the complainant requiring him to work as a construction worker for the employer. The visa was fo...

4. [2025] NZIACDT 32 - CM v Jiang (16 June 2025) [pdf, 239 KB]

   ...the complainant. The adviser’s fee was RMB 7,000 (about NZD 1,600). Mr Jiang prepared a services agreement (signed by him on 13 April 2023). It was sent to the agent, but it was never signed by the complainant. [9] The visa application was filed by Mr Jiang with Immigration New Zealand (Immigration NZ) on 13 April 2023. [10] On 30 April 2023, Immigration NZ approved a work visa for the complainant requiring him to work as a construction worker for the employer. The visa was f...

5. [2019] NZEmpC 158 Ward v Concrete Structures (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...dismissed from his employment with the respondent) dealing with the remedies awarded to him.1 The application is opposed. [2] The application is based on the reasons for the omission to bring the challenge within time; the length of the delay in filing (which is said to be short); the perceived merits of the proposed challenge; and the broader interests of justice. The opposition is primarily focused on prejudice. 1 Ward v Concre...

6. Restorative justice providers

   This section is for community based providers contracted by the Ministry of Justice to deliver Restorative Justice services. Restorative Justice publications Restorative Justice Victim Satisfaction Survey 2025 Alternative Restorative Justice pilot study March 2025 Restorative Justice Victim Satisfaction Survey 2023 Restorative Justice practice framework August 2019 Restorative Justice Family Violence Practice Standards August 2019 Restorative Justice Family Violence Practice Resources August 201

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. Lawyers & service providers >
   3. Service providers

7. General: Frequently Asked Questions

   How can I enforce a debt? Can I file a civil enforcement application? Can I file my application online? Can I pay application fees online? I am unable to attend my civil enforcement hearing, what can I do? Can I file more than one civil enforcement application at the same time for the same debt? I have more than one address for the judgment debtor, which one do I choose? What is the difference between financial assessment hearings and assessment of financial means applications? How can I find o...

   Located in:

   1. Fines & payments >
   2. About civil debt

8. [2012] NZEmpC 143 George v Auckland Council [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...behalf of Ms George the resumed hearing could not take place until 24 August this year. [3] In support of, and in opposition to the applications for further and better discovery and particulars in relation to the statement of claim, the parties filed and served voluminous affidavits annexing many documents and made lengthy legal submissions supported by reference to authorities. Further and better disclosure [4] Ms George’s amended notice of application sought orders agains...

9. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Sensible Sentencing Group Trust (Application by NZ Herald for Access to Tribunal File) [2013] NZHRRT 20 [pdf, 44 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2013] NZHRRT 20 Reference No. HRRT 006/2013 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY THE NEW ZEALAND HERALD FOR ACCESS TO THE TRIBUNAL FILE BETWEEN DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROCEEDINGS PLAINTIFF AND THE SENSIBLE SENTENCING GROUP TRUST DEFENDANT TRIBUNAL: Rodger Haines QC, Chairperson REPRESENTATION: Mr SRG Judd for plaintiff Mr DA Garrett for defendant Mr D Fisher...

10. [2022] NZACC 182 — Hodgson v ACC (20 September 2022) [pdf, 167 KB]

    ...ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Judgment on the papers. Submissions: H Armstrong for the Appellant R Wanigasekera for the Respondent Date of Judgment: 20 September 2022 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Late filing of an appeal to the District Court – s 151, Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] The appeal in the above matter was lodged by Ms Hodgson on 8 July 2022. The appeal is from the decision of a Reviewer dated 18 May...