Search Results

1. Wai 3300 2.5.018 Decision on applications for urgency [pdf, 536 KB]

   ...interested parties involved in the urgency hearing. 11. The Tribunal panel will hold an in person hearing to hear the claims on 9 – 10 May 2024, at the Tribunal Offices in Wellington (Level 2, 141 the Terrace). 12. The timetable for further filing for all parties is attached as ‘APPENDIX A’. Me tuku atu te Kairēhita i tētehi kape o tēnei whakahau ki ērā ki te rārangi whakamōhio mō Wai 3300, Wai 3307, Wai 3316, Wai 3317, Wai 3318, Wai 3319, Wai 3320, Wai 3321, Wai 119...

2. Steele v MSC 2018 Ltd (Removal of Stay and Extension of Time) [2020] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 467 KB]

   ...Member REPRESENTATION: Mr MJ Steele in person Mr M Chawla, Director of MSC 2018 Limited for defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 3 March 2020 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL LIFTING STAY AND EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING STATEMENT OF REPLY1 Background [1] On 13 May 2019 these proceedings were filed, and a notice of proceedings was served on the defendant. On that same day Mr Steele’s complaint was referred to the Human Rights Commission under s 92D...

3. NZCVS Cycle 3 resources and results

   Cycle 3 (October 2019 – November 2020) NZCVS Cycle 3 (2019-20) Full-size Core This report provides detailed insights and analysis of the New Zealand Crime and Victims Survey (NZCVS) Cycle 3 results. The report contains mostly descriptive statistics. It does not include analysis of relationships between variables. NZCVS Cycle 3 (2019-20) Core Report NZCVS Cycle 3 (2019-20) Key Findings This document summarises key findings of the NZCVS Cycle 3 (2019-20). NZCVS Cycle 3 (2019-20) Key Findings NZC

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy >
   2. Research & data >
   3. New Zealand Crime & Victims Survey (NZCVS)

4. Auckland Standards Committee 4 v Shand [2021] NZLCDT 9 (31 March 2021) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...DATE OF DECISION 31 March 2021 COUNSEL Ms S Earl for the Auckland Standards Committee Ms S Cameron for the Practitioner 2 DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL RE LIABILITY AND PENALTY Introduction [1] Mr Shand failed to provide his file when requested to do so by the Standards Committee and he continued that failure for 18 months despite further urging. He accepts a finding of unsatisfactory conduct. The Standards Committee does not argue that he should be found liable...

5. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Slater (Adjournment) [2014] NZHRRT 53 [pdf, 48 KB]

   ...12 March 2014 a Minute was issued that day directing Mr Slater to provide certain particulars by 11 April 2014 2 with the Director’s evidence to follow on 13 June 2014. Mr Slater’s own written statements of evidence were required to be filed by 11 July 2014. [3] Because Mr Slater did not provide the particulars as ordered, a second teleconference was convened on 7 August 2014. Mr Slater agreed to file the requested particulars by 19 August 2014. The timetable was reset. Th...

6. [2021] NZEmpC 107 Smartlift Systems Ltd v Armstrong [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...The company challenged the procedural findings made against it and the extent of remedies awarded. 2 Armstrong v Smartlift Systems Ltd [2019] NZERA 592 (Member van Keulen). [8] The proceedings in the Court started life when Smartlift filed its statement of claim on 13 November 2019; on the same day it applied for a stay of proceedings, which if granted would prevent enforcement of the monetary orders made by the Authority. An amended application was filed on 19 Novembe...

7. EC COVID-19 Protocol - All Alert Levels 6 September 2021 [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...the Court’s Twitter account to enable those with an interest to contact the Registry if need be. 6. Updates will be sent out via the Court’s Twitter account (@EmploymentCourt). The Court’s webpage is being updated regularly. 7. All filing of Court documents in any region which is subject to Level 4 restrictions is to be by email or using File and Pay.1 If a party does not have the ability to file electronically, mail will still be checked periodically. However, becaus...

8. Brown v Otago Polytechnic (Strike-Out Application) [2014] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...supported by Mr VE Scott as McKenzie friend Mr BCS Dorking for Otago Polytechnic DATE OF HEARING: 19 and 20 May 2014 DATE OF DECISION: 30 May 2014 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL ON STRIKE OUT APPLICATION [1] On 16 August 2013 Otago Polytechnic filed an application for an order that these proceedings be struck out. In this decision we explain why the application succeeds in part and fails in part. Background [2] On 11 July 2012 Mr Brown made a complaint to the Human Rights Com...

9. LCRO 124/2017 RG v XP (4 December 2018) [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...suggesting mediation and asking for any injunction application by Mr XP to be on notice. [5] Three months later Mr XP’S lawyers applied without notice for an interim injunction to freeze funds under Ms XP’S control. The Memorandum Ms SL filed in 2 support of that application included references to the supporting evidence, and the following: 19. [Mr XP] and [Ms XP] separated on December [date], 2015: para 2. And then at: 55. [Mr XP] is aware [Ms XP] has solicitors, and...

10. [2022] NZIACDT 5 – LS v Murthy (4 April 2022) [pdf, 199 KB]

    ...complainant provided the coloured marksheet documents to Ms A sometime between June and early August 2020. Ms Murthy was not aware of this until the telephone call on 18 August. She did not authorise Ms A, who was not her employee, to access her client files; 4. states that the EOI had been prepared and was ready for filing around the first week of July. The complainant was requested to pay Immigration NZ’s fee of $530, but he did not do so. The EOI was therefore not filed....