[2018] NZEmpC 89 Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd [pdf, 268 KB]
...contentions that he believed a witness for Infinity was “cynically continuing to conceal crimes”, and that there had been “witness-tampering”, as well as perjury.2 On those occasions, it was made clear that proper evidence needed to be filed before such serious allegations could be considered. [6] For the purposes of the present application, Mr Lorigan filed an affidavit repeating his allegations, and annexing a range of documents. These included transcripts of convers...