Search Results

1. Mills v Capital and Coast District Health Board [2019] NZHRRT 47 [PDF, 731 KB]

   (1) ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME OF WITNESS (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON Reference No. HRRT 012/2019 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN RICHARD EDWARD MILLS PLAINTIFF AND CAPITAL AND COAST DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD FIRST DEFENDANT AND HUTT DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD SECOND DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Ms GJ Goodwin, Deputy Chairperson Mr MJM K...

2. Grace – Ngarara West A25B2A (2014) 317 Aotea MB 268 (317 AOT 268) [pdf, 254 KB]

   ...from Patricia Grace for a recommendation that Ngarara West A25B2A be set aside as a Māori reservation. [6] A telephone conference was held on 10 June 2013. 1 Parties agreed to file a statement of issues and responses. A statement of issues was filed by the applicant dated 27 June 2013. A reply was filed by the Transport Agency dated 12 July 2013. [7] A further telephone conference was held on 9 August 2013. 2 There were no objections to the initial additional issues proposed...

3. Zhong v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 32 [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...Glendowie and entered into a contract with Stanley Chen, the fourth respondent, whereby Mr Chen prepared plans, drawings and specifications for the construction of the claimants‟ dwelling and one on the adjacent section, 49 Mt Taylor Drive. Mr Chen filed the application for building consent with the Auckland City Council. After the consent was issued, Ms Li engaged A1 Building Suppliers Limited (“A1”) as the private certifier to carry out the inspections of the building work...

4. [2021 NZACC 189 – CD v ACC (30 November 2021) [pdf, 578 KB]

   ...2018. [7] Mr Duncan submitted the Corporation had not considered all relevant information when it issued the decline decision dated 27 September 2011. [8] The Court allowed time to the parties to discover and exchange documents. [9] Ms Deans filed reports from: • Dr Paul Holt dated 15 January 2008 • Dr Rob Cornah dated 4 November 2008 • Dr Catherine Stedman dated 11 December 2011 • Dr Anna Fenton with the following dates: ▪ 19 November 2013; ▪ 9 Dec...

5. Top Energy Ltd - Whakataha Z1C (2015) 104 Taitokerau MB 108 (104 TTK 108) [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...the line. The line will not directly service the Māori land blocks. [10] The applications were first heard at a judicial conference on 26 June 2013. 2 There had been consultation with the trustees and owners of the land in the lead up to the filing of the applications (which I will outline below). TEL was represented by counsel, Graeme Mathias, and some of the trustees and owners interested in the applications also attended. As noted at the outset, all the trustees and owners...

6. Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Eichelbaum [2014] NZLCDT 68 [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...Eichelbaum accepted that the allegations were “superfluous” and that the more unpleasant comments ought not to have been included in the affidavit. [50] These inflammatory accusations were not included in the affidavit which was finally sworn and filed. Mr Eichelbaum says his purpose in sending the draft was to attempt to achieve a resolution without the need to file the proceedings. He wished to point out that the airing of the dispute might be unhelpful to the plaintiffs in...

7. Legal Complaints Review Officer v Hong [2015] NZLCDT 27 [pdf, 407 KB]

   ...the Legal Complaints Review Officer”. 3 [5] In correspondence with the LCS Mr Hong made further statements which form part of the current charges. [6] Meanwhile, the situation escalated between the two barristers. A counterclaim was filed in the civil proceedings. Mr Deliu brought defamation proceedings against Mr Hong seeking an injunction. This later settled on the basis of undertakings and Mr Hong engaged a private investigator to locate clients Mr Deliu had previou...

8. [2013] NZEmpC 190 Belsham v Ports of Auckland Ltd [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...his personal grievance. [3] The Authority conducted its investigation into the personal grievance. A determination was made by the Authority on 19 April 2013. 1 It was held that the dismissal of Mr Belsham was justifiable. Mr Belsham then filed a challenge to the determination with the Court. Costs in respect of the Authority investigation were awarded against him in a subsequent determination dated 22 May 2013. 2 No challenge has been filed to the costs’ determination.

9. LCRO 174/2013 ZF v H BU and G BU [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...to query or dispute any charges – they never did. [72] The statements by Mr BU and Mr ZF cannot be reconciled and were not able to be clarified at the review hearing. For reasons that were not clear, Mr ZF advised he was unable to access his files. Neither were his trust account records available in either hard copy or electronically. [73] Mr BU says, in his 15 December 2009 letter of complaint, that: When statements for estate matters were finally supplied (legal fees already...

10. NU v ZY LCRO 239/2012 (31 March 2016) [pdf, 105 KB]

    ...for levelling of accusation that venal interests were dominating the decisions. [23] It is against the backdrop of that troubled context, that this review falls for consideration. The complaint and the Standards Committee decision [24] Mr NU filed his complaint with the New Zealand Law Society Lawyers Complaints Service on 19 December 2011. The complaints filed were comprehensive. Mr NU submits that: (a) Mr ZY had failed to take steps to ascertain whether Mrs EL had capacity...