Search Results

1. CAC 20004 v Kolich & Anor [2014] NZREADT 39 [pdf, 59 KB]

   ...the cheque for the commission been paid to his agency but rather to Mr Vithal directly. Mr Vithal works as a licensed salesperson for ReMax, Wellington. Mr Vithal telephoned Mr Robinson in response to the letter he received, and Mr Robinson made a file note of this conversation. In this file note he records that Mr Vithal had said that: “Ivan wanted to do a private deal, wanted a backhander done, 50% a fee for it but hasn’t actually paid him yet. He said he not had any money ye...

2. Casas v Navarette-Scholes [2016] NZIACDT 33 (28 June 2016) [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...did not understand her visa conditions were restricted to working for one employer, and that she breached the condition and this was a matter of concern to Immigration New Zealand. [5] The grounds of complaint were wider; the complainant has not filed a statement of reply seeking to pursue the wider grounds of complaint. Accordingly, the Tribunal will only consider the grounds the Registrar considered to have potential support. The responses [6] While the Tribunal usually hears compla...

3. Prakash v Zhou [2014] NZIACDT 117 (28 November 2014) [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...fees. However, it has dismissed the complaint in respect of the failure to follow up Immigration New Zealand’s decision, as the delay was not sufficient to trigger an adverse professional disciplinary finding. The Complaint [6] The Registrar filed a Statement of Complaint. The foundation of the complaint is an allegation by the complainant that: [6.1] Ms Zhou was employed in the Practice from 30 May 2011 until 24 January 2013, and was the sole licensed immigration adviser conducting...

4. [2020] NZIACDT 47 - IK v Tian (3 November 2020) [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...informed. In respect of the complainant, she continually misled him about the status of his visa application. She made a s 61 application to Immigration New Zealand without his agreement or even knowledge. In the Xu complaint, Ms Tian had also filed a s 61 application without instructions. In addition, her approach to file management is generally poor. [39] These are not unimportant aspects of a professional service. Communications and record-keeping are not just bureaucratic...

5. Wellington International Airport Limited Legal Submissions - 10 December 2018 [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...to the economic position which has in fact improved since the RC Application was first lodged making the current RC Application economic reports conservative. In any event it is standard practice for economic figures to be updated between the filing of an application and the filing of evidence. 34. In this regard it has been asserted that the RC Application is so out of date that it has become stale. In April Mr Kyle prepared a report on the various technical reports and whether...

6. MacDonald v MacDonald - Wairau Block XII Section 6C 2C (2021) 69 Te Waipounamu MB 251 (69 TWP 251) [pdf, 256 KB]

   ...Whakataunga: Judgment date 17 March 2021 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ Judgment of Judge S F Reeves 69 Te Waipounamu MB 252 Hei tīmatanga kōrero - Introduction [1] On 25 May 2019, Phillip MacDonald filed an application seeking an interim injunction to stop his brother, Brigham MacDonald, from occupying the northern back third of Wairau Block XII Section 6C 2C, and a substantive order that Phillip may occupy the area. Brigham, who current...

7. [2021] NZIACDT 3 - DY v Parker (25 February 2021) [pdf, 219 KB]

   ...check on 16 August 2017. [9] At about the same time, the complainant instructed a new licensed immigration adviser, Mr Harris Gu. On 22 August 2017, Mr Gu terminated the complainant’s contract with Swiftvisa, before the application could be filed with Immigration New Zealand. 1 DY v Parker [2020] NZIACDT 54. 3 [10] On 16 September 2019, Mr Gu, on behalf of the complainant, made a complaint to the Authority against Mr Parker. Decision of the Tribunal [11] Giving...

8. Black v Nohotima - Ruatoki A Section 22B No 2C No 3 (2019) 228 Waiariki MB 3 (228 WAR 3) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...s 18(1)(a) of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (“the Act”) determining ownership of the dwelling in favour of the respondents.3 Ko te hātepe ture o te tono nei - Procedural history [7] The application for rehearing and a stay of orders was filed on behalf of Anituatua on 15 May 2019. A notice of intention to appear in opposition to the application, together with supporting documents, were filed by Peti and Tokai on 30 June 2019. [8] An initial hearing was then held on 12 August...

9. [2020] NZEmpC 236 Maheta v Skybus New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 259 KB]

   ...[19] Against that background there are two applications to deal with. The first is Mr Maheta’s application for a stay. The second is Skybus’ application for security for costs. The stay application [20] Mr Maheta’s challenge was filed in December 2019. At the end of January 2020 he applied for a stay but the extent of the orders sought was unclear. The application was headed as being for a stay of execution of “Employment Relations Authority proceedings”. In th

10. [2020] NZIACDT 50 - KX v Ji (2 December 2020) [pdf, 225 KB]

    ...Yan Ryan Ji, the adviser, was instructed by KX, the complainant, to obtain a work visa. The application was unsuccessful, but he did not tell her that. Nor did he obtain instructions or advise her of the outcome of two requests he subsequently filed for discretionary visas. When she enquired from time to time about progress of the initial work visa application, he lied to her. [2] A complaint to the Immigration Advisers Authority (the Authority) was referred by the Registrar of...