Search Results

1. [2020] NZREADT 54 - Beath v The Real Estate Agents Authority (29 October 2020) [pdf, 273 KB]

   ...ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 409) First Respondent AND MIKE PERO REAL ESTATE LIMITED Second Respondent On the papers Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews (Chairperson) Ms C Sandelin (Member) Mr N O’Connor (Member) Submissions filed by: Ms E Mok, on behalf of Complaints Assessment Committee 409 Ms L Lim, on behalf of the Authority Ms B Sinclair, on behalf of Mr Kemp, Ms Scoble, and Mike Pero Real Estate Limited Mr Beath Date of Ruling: 29 Octo...

2. Nyman v Appleton - Succession to Felix Appleton [2018] Chief Judge's MB 31 (2018 CJ 31) [pdf, 341 KB]

   ...02 May 2018 RESERVED DECISION OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC Copies to: John Chadwick, PO Box 456, Rotorua 3040 2018 Chief Judge’s MB 32 Introduction [1] This application, filed by Kelley Louise Te Rau Aroha Nyman (the applicant) pursuant to section 45 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993, seeks to amend a succession order issued on 7 February 2006 at 91 Ōpōtiki MB 8-11 relating to the estate of Felix Appleton al...

3. [2021] NZEnvC 063 SKP Incorporated v Auckland Council [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...(ENV-2017-AKL-077) RA WALDEN (ENV-2017-AKL-076) Appellants AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent KENNEDY POINT BOATHARBOURLTD Applicant Alternate Judge L J Newhook sitting alone under s 279 of the Act 26 February- 2 March 2018 Many memoranda filed concerning costs up until 18 March 2021 Mr KRL\1 Littlejohn for Kennedy Point Boatharbour Limited Mr D Sadlier for SKP Incorporated Mr MC Allan and Ms RS Ward from Auckland Council Mr RA Walden for himself Date of Decision: 14 May 202...

4. Proactive release – Amendments to the District Court Rules 2014, High Court Rules 2016, Court of Appeal (Civil) Rules 2005, Court of Appeal (Criminal) Rules 2001, Supreme Court Rules 2004, and Criminal Procedure Rules 2012 [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   ...will only be able to take enforcement action against the debtor. Court of Appeal (Civil) Amendment Rules 2021 12. The Court of Appeal (Civil) Amendment Rules 2021 make minor changes to the Court of Appeal (Civil) Rules to ensure that the electronic filing of documents can continue past the expiry of the Epidemic Notice (issued by the Prime Minister under Proa cti ve ly Rele as ed 4 section 5 of the Epidemic Preparedness Act 2006), which currently allows the practice, includi...

5. LCRO 253/2015 SL v NA (28 June 2019) [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...Mr Vaughan to report to me and 2 At [12]. 3 At [16]. The Committee subsequently determined to take no further action with regard to Ms EO’s complaint as to the quantum of Mr NA’s fees. 4 The file was assigned to Mr Vaughan during his term as Deputy Legal Complaints Review Officer, which expired in September 2016. Since that time Mr Vaughan has been acting as a delegate appointed pursuant to cl 6 sch 5 of the Act. 4 the final...

6. VT Ltd v BN [2020] NZDT 1535 (30 April 2020) [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...High Court in an attempt to settle his claim for the damage. As part of those proceedings, the High Court instructed that a ‘joint site visit’ be convened at BN’s property with the parties’ experts in attendance and a joint export report be filed setting out the areas of agreement and disagreement in relation to the damage and the appropriate reinstatement method (the Joint Expert Report). 2. VT 2 Limited and VT Limited provide services in relation to assessing of and reporting...

7. KC v Accident Compensation Corporation (Treatment Injury) [2022] NZACC 224 [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...injury because she suffered an injury because of treatment. [3] The Corporation’s position is that the claim does not meet the statutory criteria for cover of a treatment injury. Background [4] On 8 March 2019, an ACC injury claim form was filed for a sensitive claim said to relate to an event on 8 March 2014. The claim form indicated that the appellant preferred to have no contact with the Corporation and was not happy to discuss the matter on the phone. [5] On 9 May 2019,...

8. JM v Minister for NZSIS (Application for Non-Publication Orders) [2022] NZHRRT 32 [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...and other information did not exist. [7] Being dissatisfied with the Minster’s responses, JM brought his case to the Tribunal. Application for non-publication orders [8] The substantive case has not progressed. This is because prior to the filing of any evidence JM sought permanent non-publication orders. He sought suppression of his name, the names of his (as yet unspecified) witnesses and any details identifying them. [9] JM also said that, in the event the Tribunal refused hi...

9. NP v KT [2021] NZDT 1706 (12 October 2021) [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...do; that other trees have been poorly trimmed; that her hedge was cut lower than requested; and that the chip/mulch pile was not left where she had instructed but was left on her lawn instead. She claims $4,999.00 in compensation. 3. KT has also filed a claim for $3,207.85 as NP has not paid his invoice ($2,530.00) and he is seeking legal costs ($677.85). 4. The issues to be decided are: Under NP’s claim: a) Did KT carry out work that he was not instructed to do? b) Did KT ca...

10. [2024] NZEnvC 087 Waterfall Park Developments Ltd v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 812 KB]

    ...directions, according to which:5 3 4 5 6 (a) WPDL submitted a memorandum dated 17 November 2023 including its preferred provisions ('17 November version') and explaining that there is agreement on most aspects;6 (b) QLDC and the Hadleys filed submissions in response to confined aspects of those provisions; and (c) WPDL replied to those submissions by memorandum dated Interim decision at [140(a)]. \WDL memorandum dated 10 October 2023. Email direction dated 12 Octobe...