Search Results

1. Documents you need to file

   You can submit this file type electronically and pay any associated fee through  File and Pay. If you are starting a claim, you will generally need more than one copy of each document: one copy is filed with the court one copy is served on each of the defendants or respondent/s. If you are defending a claim you should also keep a copy for yourself. How to set out court documents Documents filed in the High Court have to be set out in the way described in rules 5.2-5.16 of the High Court R...

   Located in:

   1. Courts >
   2. Going to court >
   3. Going to court without a lawyer >
   4. Representing yourself in a civil case in the High Court

2. File a financial statement

   ...employer, if known. Details about the debtor's income, spending and property that may help the court figure out how they can pay. If the creditor is filing the financial statement, they must include the date and source of the financial information. When you file the financial statement, you must: include a copy of the judgment or order pay the filing fee Post it to: Postal address: Ministry of JusticeCentral RegistrySX10042Wellington Write the address as written above and send it the same wa...

   Located in:

   1. Fines & payments >
   2. About civil debt >
   3. Collect civil debt

3. [2007] NZEmpC AC 62/07 Taylor & Anor v von Tunzelman [pdf, 31 KB]

   ...concluded that the respondents had failed to comply with its earlier order. [8] There is an added potential difficulty in this case. Mr Bogiatto tells me that WPL went into liquidation on about 13 August which was about a week after Mr Taylor filed this challenge including on behalf of the company. So it would seem to follow that at the time of the Authority’s first determination and the filing of the challenge to that, WPL, that I understand was in effect Mr Taylor’s own comp...

4. Phon v Waitakere City Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 24 [pdf, 78 KB]

   ...report. He advised he would provide this when completed and further advised that if the claim against the Council and Mr Kaill was not supported by the claimants’ expert, the claim against them would most likely to withdrawn. The claimants filed a copy of their expert’s report without indicating they had any further advice or report from their expert. A further case conference was convened and the Council noted that the claimants’ expert report neither clarified the...

5. High quality legal aid services [pdf, 466 KB]

   ...members of the approval selection committee, the auditors bring a high level of practical knowledge and experience to our quality assurance framework. Our audit methodology is paper-based. Auditors review selected cases based on the lawyer’s files and records. For each lawyer, we select seven completed legal aid cases that cost at least $1,000, of a variety of case-types. The case files are handled on a strictly confidential basis and Ministry staff do not open the files before transf...

6. [2020] NZEmpC 218 EPB Ltd v OST [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...information. It opposes the application for leave to challenge the Authority’s substantive determination. If leave is granted it will presumably defend the challenge for the same reasons. [3] The second issue relates to costs following the filing of EPB’s discontinuance. Here, the issue is one of quantum. 1 OST v EPB Ltd [2019] NZERA 133 (Member Loftus) (substantive); OST v EPB Ltd [2019] NZERA 181 (costs). Procedural background [4] From April 2014 until...

7. [2020] NZEmpC 234 McBride v ANZCO Foods Ltd [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...NZEmpC 234 [18 December 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2020] NZEmpC 234 EMPC 178/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to extend time to file a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN KELLY MCBRIDE Applicant AND ANZCO FOODS LIMITED Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: G Bennett, advoca...

8. [2020] NZEmpC 71 Grigorovich v Precise Ltd [pdf, 344 KB]

   ...[2020] NZEmpC 71 [27 May 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2020] NZEmpC 71 EMPC 49/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to extend time to file a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to adduce further evidence BETWEEN IGOR GRIGOROVICH Applicant AND PRECISE LIMIT...

9. Carley (INZ) v Kim [2015] NZIACDT 47 (7 May 2015) [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...client communication. [3] Ms Kim did not challenge those allegations. The Tribunal has found the facts on which the allegations rely are established by the material before it, and upheld those grounds of complaint. The complaint [4] The Registrar filed a statement of complaint. Immigration New Zealand is the complainant; and the complaint relates to two clients. Three grounds of complaint arise in respect of one client, and the remaining two relate to the other client. Ms Kim was the...

10. Sufi v Department of Labour [2012] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 65 KB]

    ...twice in New Zealand 2 sought recognition as a refugee. It is said that the alleged disclosure was in breach of Principle 11 of the information privacy principles set out in the Privacy Act 1993. Hearing procedure [2] These proceedings were filed on 28 April 2011. Some 20 days later the plaintiff was deported from New Zealand on 18 May 2011. He is now an excluded person under s 15(1) of the Immigration Act 2009 meaning that no visa or entry permission may be granted to him.