Search Results

1. Civil Proceedings Steps March 2017 [pdf, 826 KB]

   ...the Accident Compensation Act 2001 Step 1: Pre-review assessment Activity Guideline Hours Tasks normally covered by Guideline Hours Pre-review assessment Where the merits of the case cannot be discerned due to volume and/or complexity of the file. up to 3 hours For  Taking instructions, attending the client  Preparation of application legal aid  Identify reasons why prospects of success are not evident and what has to occur to assess prospects of success.  Ide...

2. Recording Industry Association of New Zealand v Telecom NZ 3728 [2013] NZCOP 8 [pdf, 228 KB]

   ...Act 1994 BETWEEN RECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION NEW ZEALAND Applicant AND TELECOM NZ 3728 Respondent BEFORE THE COPYRIGHT TRIBUNAL Jane Glover DECISION ON THE PAPERS Introduction [1] This case concerns alleged file sharing infringement under s.122A-U of the Copyright Act 1994 (“the Act”). 1 Sections 122A-U of the Act set out a process for copyright owners to use when they consider that an internet user has infringed their copyright via a file sh...

3. Re Tai Rakena No. 2 (Rejection of Statement of Claim) [2018] NZHRRT 5 [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...breach of Health Information Privacy Code, r 5, there had been no interference with the privacy of Mr Tai Rakena as that term is defined in the Privacy Act, s 66. The allegations in the intended proceedings [6] In the present intended proceedings filed on 11 August 2017 (i.e. one month after the Tribunal’s decision) Mr Tai Rakena complains that when he applied to Corrections for a copy of his October 2015 request for his medical notes, that document was not provided to him. For this...

4. [2024] NZEmpC 219 Oliver v Biggs [pdf, 228 KB]

   ...against a director of a former employer. It is the fourth of several proceedings in this Court where compliance difficulties have arisen.1 1 Oliver v Star Moving Ltd [2016] NZERA Christchurch 70. [2] The statement of claim as originally filed sought a term of imprisonment because Stuart Biggs, director of the former employer, Star Moving Ltd, had not made payments, some of which were had been the subject of compliance orders. [3] Soon after substituted service of the s...

5. Legal Profession Factsheet v1.2.pdf [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...to ensure consistent practices of CMM management are delivered across all courts. This will include: • Criteria for identifying when a CMM can be considered incomplete (based on the legislation and results) • How to manage late or note filed CMMs Improvements to the type and way CMM compliance data is captured and reported, have been made to provide better visibility for court managers and will support discussions between sector partners at a local level. The data in the rep...

6. Wellbeing support

   If the information you're looking for isn't on this page, or if you have any other questions, please contact Coronial Services by emailing coronial.response@justice.govt.nz or phoning 0800 88 88 20. If you or someone you know needs emotional support, help is available. This information may be helpful for you even if you feel you were not as directly affected as other people. If you need to talk to someone If you'd like to talk to another person about how you're feeling, you may wa

   Located in:

   1. Coroners Court >
   2. Christchurch Masjidain Attack Inquiry

7. File sharing infringements

   File sharing is when material is uploaded via, or downloaded from, the internet using an application or network that enables the simultaneous sharing of material between multiple users. Uploading and downloading can (but doesn’t have to) happen at the same time. Sections 122A to U of the Copyright Act 1994 provide a process for copyright owners to use when they consider an internet user has infringed their copyright via a file-sharing network. Copyright Act 1994 File-sharing networks are not i...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Copyright

8. [2013] NZEmpC 32 Piefection Foods Ltd v Hume [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...determination that the plaintiff must pay arrears of wages to the plaintiff. In colloquial terms, any hearing will have an “all or nothing” outcome for the parties so far as personal grievance remedies are concerned. [11] The statement of claim filed on behalf of the plaintiff is not in appropriate form, containing as it does large amounts of proposed evidence and critical analysis of the Authority’s reasoning. The plaintiff is directed to file and serve by 4pm on Monday 3...

9. BZ v FI LCRO 245/2013 (5 April 2016) [pdf, 67 KB]

   ...have applied for a review of a decision of the Standards Committee in which the Committee determined to take no further action on a complaint Mr and Mrs BZ had proceeded against Mr FI. Background [2] The BZs were, at the time their complaint was filed, neighbours of clients of Mr FI’s. [3] Mr and Mrs BZ were the holders of an easement which gave them the right to pass over land owned by Mr FI’s clients. The neighbours were in bitter dispute over issues relating to access.

10. JO v QP LCRO 18 / 2011 (27 August 2012) [pdf, 118 KB]

    ...of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] This is an application for review of a determination by Auckland Standards Committee to take no further action with regard to a complaint by JO alleging that QP had forged file notes and provided incompetent advice in a conveyancing transaction, and whose conduct in Court had been misleading. [2] The allegation of forgery is an allegation that QP fabricated file notes to support evidence that he provided to the...