Search Results

1. R. Singh v Kumar [2016] NZIACDT 14 (23 March 2016) [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...but he provided no reason why that should occur.  The three documents were not due to be posted at the same time, and apparently, Mr Kumar must have posted each on a separate occasion. The first statement of reply was due before the Registrar filed the third statement of complaint.  When he received the three decisions disclosing the Tribunal did not receive statements of reply from him, Mr Kumar did not immediately deliver the documents he said he had earlier prepared and poste...

2. Wairua - Maungaroa No.1 Section 2B Block (2014) 103 Waiariki MB 133 (103 WAR 133) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...Section 2B situated in the Eastern Bay of Plenty. The block is administered as an ahu whenua trust. The current trustees are: Daniel Wairua Dawson Peta Jeff Harper Katerina Keepa Peter Wairua Walter Swanson [2] This application was filed following a decision that I issued on 7 November 2012 concerning the administration of this trust. 1 In that oral decision I completed a review of trust and issued certain directions to the trustees. 2 I also noted that Mr Peter...

3. Larsen - Estate of Tanumi Reti (2014) 88 Taitokerau MB 273 (88 TTK 273) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...the forming of the trust and believed her children also had questions about the formation of the trust. [14] The application for rehearing first came before me on 27 June 2014. 6 As a preliminary step, I clarified with Ms Larsen why she had not filed the application within the 28 days stipulated in s 43 of the Act. She said that she had not known about the formation of the trust until well after the hearing on 23 October 2013 and then raised those concerns in a letter to the Cour...

4. [2016] NZEmpC 17 NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...NZEmpC 204. [4] AFFCO’s proposed timetable which I adopt as the Court’s, based on its assessment that there are no known outstanding interlocutory issues between the parties, is as follows, with some amendments: (a) AFFCO is to file and serve any further evidence (that is in addition to the briefs it has filed already in the proceeding) and any additions to the already settled common bundle of documents, by 5 pm on 29 March 2016. (b) The Union is to file and serve...

5. Pure - Ahipara 1B2B - (2013) 69 Taitokerau MB 109 (69 TTK 109) [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...and the application must therefore be dismissed. [33] However, as noted, the solution for the dispute would appear to be clarification of the area of Jonnie’s occupation order. Jonnie indicated her surveyor could attend to this. If Jonnie files an application under s 330 of the Act to amend the occupation order within six months the filing fee is to be waived. If an application is not filed by 31 May 2014 then in my view the Registrar should of his own volition bring a s 330 ap...

6. Gardiner v Gorringe (2011) 28 Waikato Maniapoto MB 237 (28 WMN 237) [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...Maniapoto MB 238 Introduction [1] In a reserved judgment dated 22 July 2011 I dismissed the claims of the applicants against the defendants. The second third party was partially successful against the applicants. 1 [2] The defendants have filed a memorandum dated 5 August 2011 seeking costs. Their costs including GST and disbursements were $57,977.01 comprising the following amounts: a) Legal fees $44,427.00; b) GST $5,533.38; c) Legal disbursements $909.40; d) Exper...

7. Morton v Marshall [pdf, 46 KB]

   ...16 January 2002) and related documents. The “Owner” is named as “J & J Morton”, while the “Builder” is “Demic Construction” (sic). The “Application Checklist” for the Building Consent has on it a machine receipt for the filing fees which is in the name of “Demic Const”. Claim No. 3483 – Determination 5 [12] Work started towards the end of January 2002 with Mr Marshall normally present onsite; he had an apprentice and sometimes there were other wor...

8. Rudd Senior v Procter - Horowhenua 11 Lake Trust [2012] Māori Appellate Court MB 107 (2012 APPEAL 107) [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...linda@klelaw.com Mr P Taueki, P O Box 664, Levin, philiptaueki@gmail.com Dr J Procter, 654 Featherston Street, Palmerston North 4414, J.N.Procter@massey.ac.nz 2012 Maori Appellate Court MB 108 Introduction [1] This decision deals with two appeals filed against a decision of Chief Judge Isaac dated 25 August 2011. 1 The appellants are: a) Charles Rudd (Senior) and Vivienne Taueki; and b) Philip Taueki. [2] In his decision Chief Judge Isaac dismissed an application pursuant...

9. VG v AB LCRO 263 / 2011 (10 May 2013) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...done by him was done after the intervention of the NZLS, and was appropriate and necessary. Mr VG stated that he had reduced the bill by 20 % in light of Ms AB voicing concerns about delay in her obtaining her funds. [5] Mr VG said that the file showed attendances necessary to preserve the funds for distribution and also to ensure their safe distribution to Ms AB, and in particular that as Ms AB was confused by her communication with the NZLS it was his attendances with the NZL...

10. XL v BF LCRO 04 / 2012 (19 July 2013) [pdf, 103 KB]

    ...these issues led to a delay in settlement and a significant increase in the amount of time that Mr BF spent on the matter. c. Two weeks after instructing Mr BF, Ms XL said that she was considering asking her previous solicitors to take over the file. She says that Mr BF advised that this would be more expensive and slower than allowing him to complete the settlement, and that the cost for him to do so would be approximately $1,000.00. d. Following settlement, Mr BF sent Ms XL...