Search Results

1. LCRO 47/2014 HJ v GK [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...you will be aware, Mr FL is an Authorised Financial advisor, and therefore must operate his advisory service under the strict rules governed by the Financial Markets Authority. These rules provide that he is obligated to report any missing client file(s), as they may contain commercially sensitive information. Our client views the removal of these documents from his office as a very serious matter. Our client requires all the missing documents and books to be returned, to the writer�...

2. Cassidy v ACC [2013] NZACA 14 [pdf, 44 KB]

   ...accident, this was new information still to be considered by ACC and in due course ACC would issue a new decision. If Mr Cassidy supported ongoing loss of earnings, the first OIC increase would apply from 3 June 1992. [10] A notice of appeal was filed against this decision and the relief Mr Crowe sought was a reassessment of Mr Cassidy’s RE under s 61 at the full time prescribed minimum earnings rate of $295.00 per week plus $24.00 per week for his dependant spouse and the backdate...

3. RR v SU & TT LCRO 189/2013 (29 September 2015) [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...7 Costs Assessor's Report, 13 December 2012 8 [39] The costs assessor considered all of the lawyers’ invoices rendered up to the date of Ms RR’s complaint, reviewed all of Mr SU’s files that spanned over eight years of work, and was satisfied that he had done the work narrated in the accounts, and contained in the files. He concluded Mr SU’s fees were fair and reasonable, including the two invoices he had issued befo

4. LP v VS & Ors LCRO 170 / 2011 (17 May 2012) [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...(the Applicant) against VS, VR, VO, VQ and VP (the Respondents). The Standards Committee decided to take no further action on the complaint, and the Applicant seeks a review of that decision. Background [2] It appears from Court decisions on file that in 1989 the Applicant, who had been practising as a solicitor on his own account, was prohibited from doing so by the New Zealand Law Society (NZLS) but permitted to practise as an employed solicitor. Two of the Respondents, Messrs...

5. Khan v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 29 (17 March 2014) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...a written agreement that refers to the adviser. [8.3] The adviser’s name and licence number were recorded on documents submitted to Immigration New Zealand. The adviser’s response [9] The adviser responded to the Statement of Complaint by filing a Statement of Reply. [10] In the Statement of Reply the adviser accepts she: [10.1] Was a “voluntary worker” for Universal Immigration Services Limited. That company apparently provided immigration services. [10.2] Was aware of th...

6. McDonald - Pakiri G (2017) 155 Taitokerau MB 117 (155 TTk 117) [pdf, 163 KB]

   ...ARMSTRONG Copies to: Terena Wara, Tu Pono Legal Limited, P O Box 1693, DX JP30025 Rotorua 3040 terena@tupono.co.nz mailto:terena@tupono.co.nz 155 Taitokerau MB 118 [1] Terrence Hohneck and Vern Rosieur have filed an application seeking an inquiry into the administration of Omaha Marae. 1 Gregory McDonald has filed an application to enforce the trustees’ obligations on the Pakiri G Ahu Whenua Trust. 2 I have part-heard those application...

7. Searancke - Lot 2 and 4 of proposed subdivision of GS5D/318 and Lot 1 of proposed subdivision of GS5D/318 (2008) 179 Gisborne MB 61 (179 GIS 61) [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   ...land block GS5D/318 between Ingrid Searancke and the Gisborne District Council (GDC), a local authority under the Local Government Act 2002, as per the Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Estate dated 27 July 2007. An old 2004 valuation was filed in SUppOit of the application. The Agreement for Sale and Purchase records the sale price for Lots 2 and 4 as $715,000.00. It also records that the GDC will, inter alia meet all costs of the subdivision including survey, and the reasona...

8. Faleauto v GH LCRO 100/2015 (29 November 2016) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...invited both parties to provide written submissions in relation to publication of the facts of the matter and Mr Faleauto’s name, and allowed 14 days in which to do so. [5] The decision records that although Ms GH did not respond, Mr Faleauto filed submissions within the timeframe allowed. The submissions Mr Faleauto made argued that publishing his name would not be beneficial, and should be a last resort because his conduct was unintentional and would not be repeated. [6]...

9. Seymour v Paenoa Te Akau Trust - Paenoa Te Akau (Balance) Block (2016) 139 Waiariki MB 113 (139 WAR 113) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...been granted and generally opposed the application. Judge Coxhead confirmed, that given the adjournment had already be granted, those in attendance should file further submissions ahead of the next hearing. A letter of objection was subsequently filed by Mrs Westbury. [11] The proceedings were then referred to me. On 11 November 2015 I issued directions to the case manager querying whether a meeting of owners had been held to discuss the proposal, what in fact the proposal was se...

10. Cassidy v Patene - Te Rangirunga Wi Patene (2016) 349 Aotea MB 51 (349 AOT 51) [pdf, 270 KB]

    ...the present, belong to them and their siblings. 1 90 Aotea MB 108 (90 AOT 108) 2 340 AOT 271 (340 AOT 271) 349 Aotea MB 52 [3] Mr Patene believes that these proceedings were filed due to underlying tensions caused by his remarriage and he asks the Court to have regard to how he has helped his children, financially and otherwise, over the years. [4] According to correspondence on the file Mr Patene has received a...