Search Results

1. About the Tribunal

   In September 2008, Parliament passed the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 and it came into force in November 2009. It replaced the Real Estate Agents Act 1976. The Real Estate Agents Disciplinary Tribunal was established under the new Act. Purpose of the Act The main purpose of the Act is to: protect consumers involved in real estate transactions and ensure that independent, quality, effective decisions are made in dealing with alleged breaches of conduct promote the interests of consumers in real e

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Real estate agents

2. Tahere v Tau - Rangihamama X3A and Omapere Taraire E (Aggregated) (2017) Māori Appellate Court MB 62 (2017 APPEAL 62) [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...1 [2] The Tahere whānau now appeal against that order. They do so out of time. [3] The trustees of the land oppose both the appeal and the application seeking leave to appeal out of time. They submit that first, the reasons for the delay in filing the notice of appeal are insufficient and second, that the appellants have not set out any reasonable grounds for appeal. [4] On 22 February 2017 Chief Judge Isaac directed the appellants to pay $1,000 as security for costs, which was...

3. [2013] NZEmpC 61 Alatipi v CE of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...“hectic” and then on Sunday, 24 February 2013 he had to travel to Gisborne for a two-day fixture. Mr Bennett believed that he posted the statement of claim to the Registry office on Saturday, 23 February 2013. He frankly acknowledged that the late filing was entirely his fault and he submitted that, “The plaintiff should not lose his opportunity to seek to have his matter heard because of counsel’s inadvertence.” [4] In a minute dated 5 March 2013, Chief Judge Colgan sou...

4. [2020] NZEmpC 83 Hurst v Hodgson [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...sole director of Greenfields at the relevant times; Mr Hurst says he was Greenfields’ Network Development Manager. 2 Hodgson v Rural Networks Ltd [2020] NZERA 80 (Member Arthur) at [A]-[G]. [2] Mr Hurst’s challenge ought to have been filed by 20 March 2020.3 He filed an application for leave to extend time to file a challenge on 24 April 2020. This judgement resolves that application. [3] Under s 219 of the Act, the Court may extend the time for doing anything that...

5. [2011] NZEmpC 73 Snowdon v Radio New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...a letter from Quigg Partners to Moodie & Co dated 6 October 2006 and statements made by Mr Quigg before the Employment Court on 23 November 2006. Since the filing of the second amended statement of claim, the parties have been required to file and serve their briefs of evidence or “Will Say” statements from the witnesses intended to be called at the hearing, set down for four weeks commencing on 1 August 2011. [9] Mr Tizard submitted that, in determining whether or not to...

6. Guo v PwC (Non-Party Discovery - Oral Hearing) [2020] NZHRRT 51 [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...Ltd (non-party) DATE OF MINUTE: 22 December 2020 MINUTE OF CHAIRPERSON FOLLOWING TELECONFERENCE ON 18 DECEMBER 2020 AT 10AM1 [1] As required by the Minute dated 30 October 2020 at [20.1] CityMed Medical Centre Ltd (CityMed) has filed a notice of opposition to the application by Ms Guo for non-party discovery against CityMed and to the application for a witness summons addressed to CityMed staff. The notice of opposition is accompanied by an affidavit sworn by Dr SJ Cu...

7. Croft v Hing - Motatau 5E14B3B (2017) 162 Taitokerau MB 155 (162 TTK 155) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...[4] There is an old cowshed on the block that has been converted into a house (“the shed”). Mrs Croft is living in the shed. This shed is the subject of these proceedings. The application before Judge Ambler [5] In 2015, Maureen Hing filed an application seeking ownership of the shed in favour of the whānau trust.3 Mrs Croft opposed the application arguing the shed belonged to her late father. Judge Ambler adjourned the application and directed the parties to raise the...

8. Seary v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing of appeal) [2022] NZACC 187 [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Judgment on the papers. Submissions: The Appellant is self-represented J Castle for the Respondent Date of Judgment: 28 September 2022 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Late filing of an appeal to the District Court – s 151, Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] The appeal in the above matter was lodged by Ms Seary on 25 August 2022. The appeal is from the decision of a Reviewer dated 3 June...

9. [2023] NZEmpC 115 Carrington Resort Jade LP v Maheno [pdf, 226 KB]

   ...TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 115 EMPC 2/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to extend time to file pleadings AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for security for costs and stay of proceedings BETWEEN CARRINGTON RESORT JADE LP Plaintiff AND TONI MAHENO Defendant Hearing: On the papers A...

10. 2023 Decisions of public interest

    ...[2023] NZEmpC 224 Medina Trading Ltd T/A Hotel Debrett v Hunter (Preliminary Judgment of Judge Kathryn Beck, 7 December 2023) SCOPE OF CHALLENGE – a de novo challenge by definition is a challenge to the entire matter before the Authority – challenge filed by plaintiff was only to part of the determination – challenge is accurately described as a non-de novo challenge. [2023] NZEmpC 221 Cronin-Lampe v The Board of Trustees of Melville High School (Judgment (No 2) of Judge B A Corkill, 5 De...

    Located in:

    1. Employment Court >
    2. Judgments >
    3. Decisions of public interest