Search Results

1. Kartikeya v Fernyhough [2014] NZIACDT 44 (03 April 2014) [pdf, 239 KB]

   ...husband by creating the impression they were dealing with his practice, when he knew his former wife was dealing with them; he then failed to ensure they received services in accordance with the Code of Conduct. Procedural history [8] The Registrar filed a Statement of Complaint, which did not adequately set out the alleged facts as they related to the adviser or identify potential grounds with particulars relating them to the facts. [9] In the original Statement of Complaint, the Reg...

2. Williams v Accident Compensation Corporation [2017] NZHRRT 26 [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...Williams under the Privacy Act. In these circumstances Mr Williams seeks orders preventing ACC (including its employees, agents and counsel in these proceedings) from disclosing the content of the two reports to any third party. Counsel for ACC has filed a memorandum consenting to an order being made in the terms sought by Mr Williams. [7] Accordingly, at the commencement of the hearing on 26 June 2017 the following final non-publication orders were made. [7.1] The medical reports...

3. Witehira - Awarua A25 (2008) 128 Whangarei MB 282 (128 WH 282) [pdf, 3.5 MB]

   ...meeting). how the amollnt was calwlated and how payment was made, (d) Celia Wihongi is to file with the COllrt by 30 November 2007 the finallcial Statements and Audit rep0l1s for the years ending 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2007. Once Ihalfurther material isfiled the COllrt will consider appointing a forensic accountant to report to the CalirI 011 expenses alld fees paid to the tmslees and will issue further directions regarding the review of the Tmst Orde/: 128 Whangarei MB 284 (3) Pursu...

4. LCRO 49/2016 QG v WW (8 May 2018) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...supportive of them starting at the school the Court had approved. [23] It is submitted on Mr QG’s behalf that Ms WW was professionally obliged to advise the Court that: (a) she and Mr JR had had significant telephone contact the day before she filed the Application; and (b) while Mr JR’s role may at that stage have been limited to the Protection Order proceeding, his instructions clearly included the care arrangements for the children. [24] It is submitted that Ms WW c...

5. Dotcom v Crown Law Office (Inherent Powers) [2018] NZHRRT 36 [pdf, 401 KB]

   1 (1) ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF ALL INFORMATION RELATING TO PLAINTIFF’S MEDICAL CIRCUMSTANCES (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2018] NZHRRT 36 Reference No. HRRT 047/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN KIM DOTCOM Plaintiff AND CROWN LAW OFFICE First Defendant CONT. AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RP...

6. Mau Whenua Incorporated - Port Nicholson Block Settlement Trust (2020) 419 Aotea MB 112 (419 AOT 112) [pdf, 271 KB]

   ...parlance, it is a post-settlement governance entity. It operates pursuant to a trust deed dated 11 August 2008 (“the Trust Deed”). [2] On 14 August 2019, Mau Whenua Incorporated and various named individuals (together, “the applicants”) filed an application per ss 237, 238 and 19(1)(b) of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (“the Act”) to enforce the obligations of the Trust and injunct one of its subsidiaries from entering into further transactions. The original applicatio...

7. LCRO 234/2017 and 172/2018 YA and XB v WD and VS (9 April 2019) [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...number of issues including delay in finalising the Estate administration, and overcharging. Mr VS replied denying any wrongdoing on his or Ms WD’s part, set out their position in acting for the Estate, and explained that having gone through the file and spoken to colleagues, he had formed the view that he could have charged more, and may yet increase the fees he charged to the estate. Further correspondence was exchanged between the parties and NZLS. The First Decision [8] The...

8. [2018] NZEnvC 220 Middleton Family Trust v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 4.1 MB]

   ...Rather, it claims to be eligible to be a party under s274(1)(d). To be eligible to be a party under that provision, it must have 'an interest in the proceedings that is greater than the interest that the general public has'. The Society filed its s274 notice out of time. Therefore, it applies for waiver under 5281 RMA. [3] The Trust opposes the waiver and the Society's claimed eligibility as a party. The Council does not oppose the Society's waiver application an...

9. JK v SY LCRO 271/2013 (9 September 2016) [pdf, 76 KB]

   ...by signing the account authorities in February 2008 they each falsely represented that they were authorised to open and operate accounts on behalf of [CO 1] and [CO 2] when in fact they had no such authority. [23] In May 2009 Mr [MN] and Mr [JK] filed a joint defence denying all of the claims. Subsequently Mr [JK] instructed Mr [L1] a solicitor, and Mr [L2] QC, who appeared on his behalf at a judicial settlement conference on 22 September 2009. The correspondence suggests that due to...

10. Clough v CAC520, Bunn & Christiansen [2019] NZREADT 46 (5 November 2019) [pdf, 389 KB]

    ...Christiansen have engaged in unsatisfactory conduct, under s 72 of the Act. [64] The Tribunal will receive submissions from the parties as to what orders, if any, should be made pursuant to s 93 of the Act, as follows: [a] Submissions by Mr Clough: to be filed and served no later than 15 working days after the date of this decision; [b] Submissions for the Authority: to be filed and served no later than 15 working days after the date of Mr Clough’s submissions; [c] Submissions f...